** Murray Energy paid nearly $1 million to law firm that fought renewable energy ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Dave Anderson on May 19, 2020 10:07 pm
Murray Energy paid nearly $1 million to a law firm that’s fought new wind and solar power development in Ohio. The law firm also played a role in the now-bankrupt coal producer’s efforts to secure a bailout and regulatory rollbacks from the Trump administration.
Murray Energy paid a total of $993,628.88 to the law firm Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff since last August, according to bankruptcy case filings.
Thousands of dollars also flowed to the law firm from Foresight Energy, in which Murray Energy owns a controlling share, as Foresight headed toward bankruptcy.
A “Statement of Financial Affairs ([link removed]) ” filed by Murray Energy Corporation in its bankruptcy case lists ten payments totaling $729,934.88 ([link removed]) made to the law firm between August 8 and October 25 of last year. One $250,000 payment to the firm was made on October 25, just four days before Murray Energy filed for bankruptcy.
Murray Energy then requested ([link removed]) and obtained ([link removed]) court approval to continue to employ Benesch Friedlander and other outside firms during its bankruptcy. A total of $263,694 was paid to Benesch Friedlander for its work on “Environmental Litigation Matters in West Virginia and Ohio” in February and March of this year, according to another bankruptcy case filing ([link removed]) .
** Murray Energy’s pre-bankruptcy payments to Benesch Friedlander overlap with legal filings by an attorney from the firm on behalf of opponents of the Icebreaker offshore wind power project
------------------------------------------------------------
Murray Energy listed “services” as the reason for its pre-bankruptcy payments ([link removed]) to Benesch Friedlander, and the bankruptcy documents don’t provide much more detail about what those services entailed.
The pre-bankruptcy payments disclosed by Murray Energy were made over a 90-day time period when John F. Stock, a Benesch Friedlander attorney, filed expert testimony ([link removed]) and a post-hearing brief ([link removed]) on behalf of two Bratenahl, Ohio, residents who are opposing the Icebreaker offshore wind power project in Lake Erie before the Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB). Six of the payments were made on October 11, the same day Stock filed the post-hearing brief.
Murray Energy’s funding of the Icebreaker opponents’ legal fees has been previously reported, but the bankruptcy documents provide new information about the coal company’s payments to Benesch Friedlander since last summer.
“The only formal opponents are two northern Ohio residents whose legal expenses and expenses for expert witnesses are being funded by coal producer Murray Energy Corp.,” E&E News reported in a September story on the Icebreaker project ([link removed]) .
The Cleveland Plain Dealer first reported in 2018 on Murray Energy’s funding ([link removed]) of the Bratenahl residents’ legal expenses in the Icebreaker case, based on documents ([link removed]) and testimony ([link removed]) obtained during depositions.
After Murray Energy filed for bankruptcy in October, Stock filed another brief in the case ([link removed]) that stated the coal company was no longer paying the Bratenahl residents’ legal fees. On the same day, Murray Energy filed its motion ([link removed]) seeking bankruptcy court approval to employ Benesch Friedlander and other outside firms.
Prior to representing the Bratenahl residents, Stock requested to be added to the service list ([link removed]) for the Icebreaker project’s OPSB case on behalf of the Campaign for American Affordable and Reliable Energy, a front group for the coal industry ([link removed]) .
Stock and Benesch Friedlander have represented anti-wind activists ([link removed]) in other cases in Ohio; last year Stock declined to answer a reporter’s questions ([link removed]) about who paid for his work on one of those cases.
Stock also represented the Ohio Coal Association ([link removed]) , which counts Murray Energy’s founder and chairman Robert E. Murray among its board members, last year in its successful bid ([link removed]) to block American Electric Power’s plan for funding new wind and solar projects in Ohio. In February, the Ohio Coal Association filed a claim for $23,500 in dues ([link removed]) in Murray Energy’s bankruptcy case.
** Other documents provide more details about Benesch Friedlander’s earlier work for Murray Energy
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy records currently document Murray Energy’s payments to Benesch Friedlander between August 2019 and March 2020, but they don’t provide information about how much the law firm was paid for its earlier work on behalf of the coal company.
Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by American Oversight show that Benesch Friedlander submitted comments on behalf of Murray Energy ([link removed]) in support of FirstEnergy Solutions’ 2018 petition to the Department of Energy for a bailout of struggling coal and nuclear power plants in the PJM power grid ([link removed]) .
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP was also cc’ed on a 2017 “Confidential Memorandum ([link removed]) ” from Robert Murray that laid out a “holistic strategy” for the Trump administration “to help to bring American Coal back from the precipice of extinction.” The memo recommended a number of actions that the Trump administration could take to roll back or weaken federal limits on coal-related pollution and enforcement of mine safety rules.
Orla E. Collier, the co-chair of Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff’s Energy Practice Group, submitted comments ([link removed]) to the Environmental Protection Agency on behalf of Murray Energy. In the comments, Murray Energy “enthusiastically applauded” the Trump administration’s rollback of the Obama-era Clean Power Plan, which sought to establish the first-ever limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act. The coal company’s comments also attacked the EPA’s science-based 2009 endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change.
** Foresight Energy’s payments to Benesch Friedlander
------------------------------------------------------------
In March, Foresight Energy followed Murray Energy into bankruptcy. Like Murray Energy, Foresight Energy obtained ([link removed]) court approval to employ Benesch Friedlander during its bankruptcy.
A declaration and disclosure statement ([link removed]) filed by Benesch Friedlander shows that Foresight Energy owes the firm just over $33,000 for services provided before the bankruptcy. Benesch Friedlander disclosed estimated monthly compensation of $5,000 to $10,000 for “general legal services, including litigation and regulatory work.” It also disclosed an hourly rate of $245-$730.
Foresight Energy Services paid Benesch Friedlander $7542.35 on March 6 ([link removed]) , just a few days before filing for bankruptcy. Hillsboro Energy, another subsidiary of Foresight Energy, also paid $6,457.65 ([link removed]) to the law firm that same day.
Last summer in Illinois, Benesch Friedlander submitted comments on behalf of Foresight Energy ([link removed]) in which the coal producer “vehemently opposed” the Integrated Resource Plan of the City of Springfield’s municipal utility. The plan called for the retirement of several old coal generating units, a money-saving move later approved by the city council ([link removed]) . In the comments, Foresight Energy attacked a recommendation for the utility to commit to procuring 53 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2031.
In other bankruptcy case filings, Murray Energy has pointed to the decreasing costs of wind and solar power ([link removed]) as a factor in coal’s decline.
Top image of the Middlegrunden offshore wind farm in Denmark by Kim Hansen and Richard Bartz via Wikipedia Commons ([link removed]) . Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ([link removed]) .
The post Murray Energy paid nearly $1 million to law firm that fought renewable energy ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** North Carolina utilities not reconnecting customers during COVID-19 pandemic ([link removed])
** Duke Energy Climate Report charts fossil fuel-laden path to net-zero, lagging behind peers ([link removed])
** Southern Company’s Lobbying Disclosures Obscure State-Level Information from Investors, Public ([link removed])
** Two Controversial Virginia Gas Plants Face Increasing Uncertainty, Documents Show ([link removed])
** After its $2.65 billion gas asset acquisition, DTE Energy tells Wall Street there is nothing to worry about as Fitch downgrades the company ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
