What kind of an American Presidential transition process is the world seeing? What are we all actually witnessing? And are Americans willing, as Scottish poet Robert Burns said, “to see ourselves, as others see us?”

The world hears “Dr. Strangelove” lunatics, like Rear Admiral Thomas Buchanan, Director of the Plans and Policy Directorate of the U.S. Strategic Command, speak of making sure that the United States has enough spare thermonuclear weapons left over after World War Three, so that it can lead what’s left of the world afterwards! President-elect Trump, though, has said: “I disagree very vehemently with sending missiles hundreds of miles into Russia. Why are we doing that? We're just escalating this war and making it worse. That should not have been allowed to be done,” directly contradicting the action of the exiting “Collective Biden” Administration.

Perhaps the right question for the American people, is: What kind of Presidential transition will we, the people, make possible? Will we transition away from the “secret government” quasi-dictatorship that we have lived under since the “Reichstag fire” called “9/11,” or, instead, plunge further into the abyss of “inevitable thermonuclear war?” Eight-time Presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche, even in the dark hours of 9/11, gave leadership, insisted upon calm, and proposed strategic alternatives based on physical economic development.

Today’s discussion features the work of LaRouche and his associates to propose that a new security and development architecture that can transition the world, including the American Presidency, from impending thermonuclear Hell to a world community of principle.