[link removed]
FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Murdoch Outlets and Bezos' WaPo Demand More Sympathy for Health Insurance Execs Ari Paul ([link removed])
NYT: The Rage and Glee That Followed a C.E.O.’s Killing Should Ring All Alarms
Zeynep Tufekci (New York Times, 12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) "can’t think of any other incident when a murder in this country has been so openly celebrated."
The early morning murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was met on social media with a “torrent of hate” for health insurance executives (New York Times, 12/5/24 ([link removed]) ). Memes mocking the insurance companies and their callous disregard for human life abound on various platforms (AFP, 12/6/24 ([link removed]) ).
Internet users are declaring that the man police believe to be the shooter, 26-year-old Luigi Mangione, is certifiably hot (Rolling Stone, 12/9/24 ([link removed]) ; KFOX, 12/10/24 ([link removed]) ). A lookalike contest for the shooter was held in lower Manhattan (New York Times, 12/7/24 ([link removed]) ).
If so many people are unsympathetic at best in response to such a killing, that might be a reason to revisit why health insurance companies are so loathed. The rage “was shocking to many, but it crossed communities all along the political spectrum, and took hold in countless divergent cultural clusters,” the New York Times (12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) noted. Mangione was reportedly found with an anti-insurance manifesto that stated “these parasites had it coming” (Newsweek, 12/9/24 ([link removed]) ), echoing a resentment largely felt by a lot of Americans, and targeted fury at UnitedHealthcare specifically.
UnitedHealthcare has always stood out for exceptionally high rate of claims denial generally in the industry (Boston Globe, 12/5/24 ([link removed]) ; Forbes, 12/5/24 ([link removed]) ). For example, a Senate committee found that “UnitedHealthcare’s prior authorization denial rate for post-acute care jumped from 10.9% in 2020 to 22.7% in 2022” (WNYW, 12/7/24 ([link removed]) ).
The Times (12/5/24 ([link removed]) ) reported that the Senate committee found that “three major companies—UnitedHealthcare, Humana and CVS, which owns Aetna—were intentionally denying claims” related to falls and strokes in order to boost profits. UnitedHealthcare “denied requests for such nursing stays three times more often than it did for other services.”
** Increasing dissatisfaction
------------------------------------------------------------
Gallup: Americans' Views of U.S. Healthcare Quality and Coverage, 2001-2024
The perception of the quality of US healthcare has been on the decline since 2012 (Gallup, 12/6/24 ([link removed]) ).
On top of that, Americans generally believe their insurance-centered system is a mess. Gallup (12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) reported that “Americans’ positive rating of the quality of healthcare in the US is now at its lowest point in Gallup’s trend dating back to 2001.”
It continued:
The current 44% of US adults who say the quality of healthcare is excellent (11%) or good (33%) is down by a total of 10 percentage points since 2020 after steadily eroding each year. Between 2001 and 2020, majorities ranging from 52% to 62% rated US healthcare quality positively; now, 54% say it is only fair (38%) or poor (16%).
As has been the case throughout the 24-year trend, Americans rate healthcare coverage in the US even more negatively than they rate quality. Just 28% say coverage is excellent or good, four points lower than the average since 2001 and well below the 41% high point in 2012 ([link removed]) .
Ipsos (2/27/24 ([link removed]) ) likewise found:
Most Americans are unsatisfied with the healthcare system, say the health insurance system is confusing and opaque, and many have skipped or delayed care because of a bad experience or the lack of timely appointments. A small, but not insignificant number, of Americans believe they have had a negative health outcome as result of their experiences within the healthcare system.
When this inefficient system doesn’t literally kill Americans, it can still kill them financially. “Almost a third of all working adults in the United States are carrying some kind of medical debt—that’s about 15% of all US households,” Marketplace (3/27/24 ([link removed]) ) reported. It added: “This debt is also the leading cause of bankruptcies in the country.”
Many news outlets’ pontificators, however, were incensed that anyone would voice frustration with health insurance when an industry CEO has fallen.
** 'Not the time to offer criticism'
------------------------------------------------------------
NY Post: UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s murder brings cruelest internet trolls to the surface
After Brian Thompson's killing, the New York Post (12/5/24 ([link removed]) ) condemned those on social media who "swooned over his killer, speculated on his motives, and wondered if Timothée Chalamet would play him in the movie."
Responding to the memes and the jokes, many of which were more about the unjust health insurance system than support for vigilante murder, the New York Post editorial board (12/5/24 ([link removed]) ) asked:
Do the jokes point to a society that has become so desensitized by the coarseness of online discussion, so disassociated from kindness, that a baying mob cheers a man’s murder and cries out for more?
And upon Mangione’s arrest, the Post (12/9/24 ([link removed]) ) complained that on social media, “tasteless trolls showered praise on the Ivy League grad.” The Post (12/11/24 ([link removed]) ) also fretted about fake “Wanted” posters for insurance company executives that the paper considered a “a fear-mongering social media stunt to incite hysteria,” adding that the “murder has also spawned a stream of merchandise sympathetic towards the 26-year-old being sold by online retailers, forcing Amazon to pull them from its website.”
Fox News (12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) quoted one of its own contributors, Joe Concha, saying, “I think this encapsulates the far left's worldview: If you run a company that isn't to their liking, you deserve to die.” The network (12/7/24 ([link removed]) ) praised Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania for “tearing into” a New York article (12/7/24 ([link removed]) ) that the outlet characterized as saying “resentment over denied insurance claims made...Thompson's murder inevitable."
The dismay was felt in other corners of right-wing media. At the Free Press (12/5/24 ([link removed]) ), the brainchild of anti-woke crusader Bari Weiss ([link removed]) , Kat Rosenfield wrote:
The people celebrating Brian Thompson’s murder by turning him into an avatar for everything wrong with the American healthcare system remind me of nothing so much as Hollywood screenwriters, cunningly manipulating an audience into cheering on unforgivable acts of fictional violence.
The National Review (12/4/24 ([link removed]) ) huffed:
This is not the time to offer your criticisms of the health-insurance industry. And there is never a time to believe that corporate executives are, by their very nature, evil people who deserve to be killed. Yet that is what you’ll see if you go on social media right now and look at comments on news stories about this assassination.
Yet all of these outlets at the same time have run support for Daniel Penny, the man recently acquitted for killing a Black homeless man on the New York City subway (National Review, 6/17/23 ([link removed]) ; Free Press, 10/20/24 ([link removed]) ; New York Post, 12/4/24 ([link removed]) ; Fox News, 12/6/24 ([link removed]) ). These outlets likewise expressed support for Kyle Rittenhouse after he gunned down Black Lives Matter protesters (National Review, 11/19/21 ([link removed]) ; Free Press, 11/17/21 ([link removed]) ; New York Post, 11/19/21
([link removed]) ; Fox News cited by Media Matters, 11/11/21 ([link removed]) ), and for George Zimmerman when he shot Trayvon Martin (National Review, 6/22/20 ([link removed]) ; New York Post, 7/15/13 ([link removed]) ; Fox News, 7/18/12 ([link removed]) ). In other words, it's fine to defend vigilantes when they kill unarmed Black people or anti-racist activists, but when a CEO’s life is taken, we must solemnly stay silent on the reasons why such a person might be targeted or why bystanders might not be crying.
Piers Morgan (New York Post, 12/10/24 ([link removed]) ) made this clear when he said “I cheered when I heard” Penny’s acquittal, and felt “shocked and saddened when I saw the footage” of the Thompson shooting. “Those two reactions would surely be the correct and appropriate ones for anyone with an ounce of fairness and humanity in their heart,” he said—because Thompson was "a non-violent, non-threatening, non-criminal man in the street," whereas Penny's victim was “a dangerous, mentally ill, homeless man.”
** Blame it on Medicare
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: Is Murdering Healthcare CEOs Justified?
The Wall Street Journal (12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) made the absurd claim that a medical system based on private insurance is better than any other kind of healthcare system.
It was the Wall Street Journal, the more erudite of Murdoch’s media properties, that really addressed the question of why people might hate health insurance companies. The anger was misdirected, the editorial board (12/6/24 ([link removed]) ) said. Rather, we should look to federally funded healthcare if we want to get mad: “Medicare and Medicaid, two government programs, cover about 36% of Americans,” the paper observed; because they “pay doctors and hospitals below the cost of providing care…many providers won’t see Medicaid patients, resulting in delayed care.”
It's an odd argument, given that people who receive Medicaid report being happier with their health insurance than people who get it through their employers or pay for it themselves—and people with Medicare are the happiest of all (KFF, 6/15/23 ([link removed]) ). If the federal programs are underpaying healthcare providers, the obvious solution would be to increase funding for them—an initiative the Journal would be unlikely to support.
The board (Journal, 10/10/24 ([link removed]) ) later dismissed critiques of the health insurance industry and passed off Mangione as a “disturbed individual” radicalized by the Internet and said it is “a dreadful sign of the times that Mr. Mangione is being celebrated.”
Journal editorial board member Allysia Finley (12/8/24 ([link removed]) ) followed up by placing the blame on the Affordable Care Act (aka “Obamacare”). “Having insurance doesn’t change people’s behavior,” she wrote, but does “cause them to use more care.” The situation, she said, "has gotten worse since Obamacare expanded eligibility” for Medicaid. This portrait of US patients overusing healthcare like sweet-toothed children let loose in a candy store is belied by (among other things) the fact that Americans live 4.7 fewer years than the average of comparable countries (KFF, 1/30/24 ([link removed]) ).
The Journal editorial went on to complain that “some providers prescribe treatments and tests that may be medically unnecessary,” and so “insurers have tried to clamp down on such abuse by requiring prior authorization.” While this “can result in delayed care that is medically necessary…it’s also how insurers control costs.”
In reality, doctors are complaining that insurance bureaucrats are impeding their ability to deliver needed healthcare because of this cost-slashing system (Forbes, 3/13/23 ([link removed]) ). The American Medical Association found “94% of doctors say prior authorization leads to delays in patient care” (Chief Medical Executive, 3/14/23 ([link removed]) ); “one in three doctors (33%) say prior authorization has led to serious adverse events with their patients.”
Journal editorialists appear to believe that doctors are jauntily giving away expensive blood pressure medicine and signing up patients for brain surgery for no particular reason, and the only thing that can stop this carnival of care is some bureaucrat who is trained to say “no.” The reality is that the private insurance system "saves insurance companies money by reflexively denying medical care that has been determined necessary by a physician," as pediatrician William E. Bennett Jr. (Washington Post, 10/22/19 ([link removed]) ) wrote. This is why people are so unsympathetic to Thompson, who was paid an estimated $10 million annually for imposing medical austerity on patients and providers (PBS, 12/7/24 ([link removed] then you know the,base pay
and stock options.) ).
** Pity the insurance giants
------------------------------------------------------------
WaPo: A sickness in the wake of a health insurance CEO’s slaying
The Washington Post (12/7/24 ([link removed]) ) criticized those who tried to use Thompson's killing "as an occasion for policy debate about claim denial rates by health insurance companies." (Note that both the Post and the Wall Street Journal used the same photo of flags at half-mast.)
Right-wing media weren’t the only engaging in scolding. At the Jeff Bezos–owned Washington Post, the editorial board (12/7/24 ([link removed]) ) criticized those “who excuse or celebrate the killing,” as well as those “who do not countenance the killing itself” but “have nevertheless tried to treat it as an occasion for policy debate ([link removed]) about claim denial rates by health insurance companies, an admittedly legitimate issue.” The Post added that debate was “fine in principle, but we’re skeptical that this particular moment lends itself to nuanced discussion of a complicated, and heavily regulated, industry.”
The editors nevertheless spent a lengthy paragraph explaining to readers that “controlling healthcare costs requires difficult trade-offs,” and that "even the most generous state-run health systems in other countries also have to face” these trade-offs. The editorial attempted to summon sympathy for
insurers, whose profits are capped by federal law, [and] must contend with consumer demand for ready access to high-priced specialists and prescription drugs—and, at the same time, premiums low enough that people can afford coverage.
Note that insurance company profits are “capped” by requiring them to spend at least 80% of premiums on claims, a percentage known as their loss ratio—but those claims can be paid to providers that are owned by the insurers themselves, “a loophole that makes loss ratio requirements meaningless” (Physicians for a National Healthcare Program, 7/16/21 ([link removed]) ). United Healthcare has been particularly aggressive at this, which is part of the reason its “capped” profits soared to $22.4 billion ([link removed]) in 2023.
As for the Post’s assertion that insurance providers should keep “premiums low enough that people can afford coverage,” KFF (10/9/24 ([link removed] premiums for employer%2Dsponsored,the cost of family coverage.) ) found that “Family premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance rose 7% this year to reach an average of $25,572 annually, marking the “second year in a row that premiums are up 7%.” The Center for American Progress (11/29/22 ([link removed]) ) found that employer sponsored insurance “premiums have risen above the rate of inflation and have outpaced wage growth” over the course of a decade. “Escalating grocery bills and car prices have cooled, but price relief for Americans does not extend to health care,” USA Toda
y (10/9/24 ([link removed]) ) reported.
The Post added that all this talk about how Americans are being tortured by the insurance system should wait until next year, “when Congress is to consider whether to keep temporary Obamacare enhancements that have boosted enrollment.”
It is easy to see the material interests of the Washington Post's owner at work. Jeff Bezos’ Amazon does not run a health insurance company, but it is fully entrenched in the for-profit medical system. It offers a health insurance marketplace ([link removed] health insurance&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAAD07U08P0UC2LPe7hbp23G5vgwAf5&gclid=Cj0KCQiApNW6BhD5ARIsACmEbkUMcomdMNw8XWMbpNjzuaUsjVrzpU9MeqKpYyHNLSFlmAnTMVKkTJIaAhI0EALw_wcB) through AmazonFlex, acquired the healthcare provider One Medical last year (NPR, 11/12/23 ([link removed]) ; Forbes, 4/5/24 ([link removed]) ), and offers
([link removed]) a pharmacy and other health services.
As one of the world’s richest people, Bezos might have another reason to be worried about people cheering on the murder of CEOs: Amazon is often hated for its monopoly-like grip on online retail (FTC, 9/26/23 ([link removed]) ), as well as charges of price-gouging (Seattle Times, 8/14/24 ([link removed]) ) and union-busting (Guardian, 4/3/24 ([link removed]) ).
** 'Last or near last'
------------------------------------------------------------
Life Expectancy vs. Healthcare Spending, 1970-2015
The failure of the US healthcare system in one chart ([link removed]) : life expectancy plotted against healthcare spending.
The Washington Post's line about the comparable ills of "generous state-run health systems" echoed a similar argument from the Wall Street Journal's editorial, which concluded:
Government healthcare is a recipe for more care delays and denials. Witness the fiasco in the United Kingdom, where the Labour government reports that more than 120,000 people died in 2022 while on the National Health Service’s waitlist for treatment. To adapt a famous Winston Churchill phrase, private insurance is the worst form of healthcare, except for all others.
The statement that the British or European health systems are worse for people than the US private insurer–dominated system is simply false. Just months ago, the Commonwealth Fund (NBC, 9/19/24 ([link removed]) ) found that the United States
ranks as the worst performer among 10 developed nations in critical areas of healthcare, including preventing deaths, access (mainly because of high cost) and guaranteeing quality treatment for everyone.
The US “ranked last or near last in every category except one,” precisely because
the complex labyrinth of hospital bills, insurance disputes and out-of-pocket requirements that patients and doctors are forced to navigate put the US second to last in administrative efficiency.
The Commonwealth Fund (CNN, 1/31/23 ([link removed]) ) also found that
the United States spends more on healthcare than any other high-income country, but still has the lowest life expectancy at birth and the highest rate of people with multiple chronic diseases.
Healthcare providers in Mexico and Costa Rica are huge draws for Americans in need of care who can’t make it through America’s Kafkaesque system (NPR, 3/8/23 ([link removed]) ). Spain and Portugal are attracting American retirees, and good low-cost health care is one incentive (Travel + Leisure, 6/20/24 ([link removed]) ).
** Retreat to the castle
------------------------------------------------------------
Fox News: Democratic strategist sounds alarm on party’s ‘imploding’ coalition: 'Have not listened to the voters’
Apparently the CEOs that Fox News (11/13/24 ([link removed]) ) is so concerned about don't qualify as "professional elites."
While the Washington Post’s position clearly falls in line with its material allegiance to a system where its owner sits at the apex, the positions from Murdoch are more interesting. As the Democratic Party has lost support among the working class (NPR, 11/14/24 ([link removed]) ; USA Today, 11/30/24 ([link removed]) ), Murdoch's outlets have touted Donald Trump and the Republican Party as alternatives for working-class voters.
Murdoch and other purveyors of Republican propaganda have promoted the idea that Democrats serve only financial elites and Hollywood producers, and that protectionist policies under Trump will help US workers (New York Post, 7/16/24 ([link removed]) ; Fox News, 11/13/24 ([link removed]) ). Republicans were able to woo voters by complaining about the high price of gasoline and groceries under the Biden administration (CNBC, 8/7/24 ([link removed]) ).
Now Murdoch outlets are fully retreating into their elite castle and telling the rabble to stop complaining about the lack of access to healthcare. The Republicans and their news outlets have worked hard to recharacterize themselves as something more populist, but the Thompson killing has brought back the old narrative that they are, proudly, the champions of the 1 Percent.
Read more ([link removed])
Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
FAIR's Website ([link removed])
FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .
Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])
change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .