|
Biden Pardon Scandal
|
PARDON SCANDAL: The Biden Family’s Arc of
Corruption
Joe Biden’s execrable pardon of Hunter perfectly fits the Biden
family’s arc of corruption. The pardon seems to be all about protecting
Joe Biden and helping ensure his son will be less likely to testify against
him. Indeed, Joe Biden’s pardon statement is full of false allegations
about how Hunter’s prosecution (hamstrung by his very own Justice
Department) was selective and corrupt. The only “selective prosecution”
involved here is the decision not to select Joe Biden for prosecution.
The Biden gang tried to rig the prosecution of Hunter. It failed largely
because of honest IRS whistleblowers and one tough judge. Joe Biden has
broken his “promise” and pardoned Hunter for his role in the treasonous
Chinese and Ukrainian business relationships involved in the tax case.
President Biden arguably overstepped his constitutional authority on Sunday
by issuing an unusual blanket pardon for Hunter Biden for any and all
offenses (known and unknown) for a ten-year time period (up until this
week!).
As Joe Biden did not pardon himself, he can and should face a serious
criminal investigation for his family corruption ring.
Will Attorney General Garland resign in protest and outrage now that Joe
Biden has stated Garland’s prosecution of Hunter Biden was corrupt and
selective? Are Biden's criticisms of the Justice Department’s employees
as corrupt and “dangerous” or is that only true when Republicans,
Trump, and conservatives criticize the Justice Department?
In the meantime, we have already expanded our Biden family corruption
investigations to include this latest pardon scandal.
We have multiple federal lawsuits focused on Biden family corruption:
In June 2024, we received records
from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) showing Mike Morell, former
acting CIA director under President Obama, requesting CIA permission to
publish a
letter by former intelligence community leaders stating that
they believed the laptop emails exposing Hunter Biden’s connections to
Ukraine were Russian disinformation. Morrell’s request for prepublication
review was approved in just six hours by the CIA.
In May 2023, we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
against the National Archives for Biden family records and communications
regarding travel and finance transactions, as well as communications
between the Bidens and several known business associates.
On October 14, 2022, we sued
the Justice Department for all records in the possession of FBI Supervisory
Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten regarding an August 6, 2020, briefing
provided to members of the U.S. Senate. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Chuck
Grassley (R-IA) raised concerns that the briefing was intended to undermine
the senators’ investigation of Hunter Biden.
In December 2020, State Department records
obtained through a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit showed that former U.S.
Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch had specifically warned
in 2017 about corruption allegations against Burisma Holdings.
In October 2020, we forced the release of State Department records
that included a briefing checklist of a February 22, 2019, meeting in Kyiv
between then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and Sally
Painter, co-founder and chief operating officer of Blue Star Strategies, a
Democratic lobbying firm which was hired by Burisma Holdings to combat
corruption allegations. At the time of the meeting, Hunter Biden was
serving on the board of directors for Burisma Holdings.
Given the record, one can expect more corruption to emerge from the Biden
crime family. And one can expect Judicial Watch to be there to pursue the
truth.
JUDICIAL WATCH VICTORY: Court Finds Fani Willis in Default, Orders Her
to Produce Records
The lawfare against Donald Trump has not only been corrupt but also
sloppy.
The Superior Court in Fulton County entered an
order granting a motion for default judgment against District
Attorney Fani Willis in our lawsuit for communications Willis had with
Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. In doing so,
the court grants our request for attorneys’ fees and orders Willis to
search for and provide releasable records to us within five business
days.
We filed our March 2024 lawsuit
in the Superior Court of Fulton County, GA, after Willis and the county
denied having any records responsive to an August 2023 Georgia Open Records
Act (ORA) request for communications with the Special Counsel’s office
and/or the January 6 Committee (Judicial
Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No.
24-CV-002805)).
In our lawsuit
we stated that Willis’ “representation about not having records
responsive to the request is likely false.” We referred to a December 5,
2023, letter
from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to Willis that cites a
December 2021 letter from Willis to then-House January 6 Committee Chairman
Bennie Thompson (D-MS). In that letter Willis requested assistance from the
committee and offered to travel to DC.
In May 2024, we asked
the court to declare a default judgment, noting that Willis was served with
the lawsuit in March 2024 and had “not filed an answer,” which “was
due 30 days after service.”
The recently issued default
judgment states: “The Court finds Defendant [Willis, in her
official capacity] is in default and has been since 11 April 2024.”
Further, Willis “never moved to open default on any basis (not even
during the period when she could have opened default as a matter of right),
she never paid costs, and she never offered up a meritorious defense.”
Plaintiff is thus entitled to judgment by default as if every item and
paragraph of the complaint were supported by proper and sufficient
evidence. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-55(a). Here, this means Plaintiff has
established that Defendant violated the ORA by failing to either turn over
responsive records or else notify Plaintiff of her decision to withhold
some or all such records.
In its complaint, Plaintiff sought the
following relief:
1) a declaration that Defendant has violated
the ORA;
2) an order for Defendant to search for all
records responsive to Plaintiff’s request without further
delay;
3) an injunction ordering Defendant to cease
withholding non-exempt public records responsive to the request;
4) an award of attorney’s fees and costs
pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-73(b);
5) a writ of mandamus, ordering Defendant to
provide the requested records; and
6) any other relief the Court deems
proper.
By finding Defendant in default, the Court
has in effect declared that she has violated the ORA. The Court also hereby
ORDERS Defendant to conduct a diligent search of her records for responsive
materials within five business days of the entry of this Order. Within that
same five day period, Defendant is ORDERED to provide Plaintiff with copies
of all responsive records that are not legally exempted or excepted from
disclosure. If Defendant is required or decides to withhold all or part of
a requested record, she should follow the procedures set forth in the ORA
(see O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(d)). If the records are stored electronically,
they may be produced electronically in a commonly used format such as PDF.
The Court expects that such production will include the correspondence
identified by Plaintiff in its complaint. If it does not, Defendant is
further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not
exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld). Beyond that,
no other relief, injunctive or otherwise, is necessary at this time (to
include striking Defendant’s answer, which is of no effect based on the
Court’s finding of default).
The court set a hearing on our attorneys’ fees for December 20.
Fani Willis is something else. We’ve been doing this work for 30 years,
and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been
found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records
lawsuit. We look forward to getting any documents from the Fani Willis
operation about collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy
Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised “get-Trump”
prosecution.
We have several Freedom of Information Act lawsuits related to the
prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:
In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked
a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top
staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting
former President Donald Trump and other Americans.
(Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Smith was at
the center of several controversial issues, the IRS
scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation
revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack
Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal
investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)
In January 2024, we filed a lawsuit
against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan
Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was
hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions
against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election
disputes.
In October 2023, we sued
the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special
Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s
office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the
investigation of former President Trump and his 18 co defendants in the
Fulton
County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is
refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do
so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s
litigation challenging this is continuing.
Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023,we received
the engagement
letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg
paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan
(R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s
oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former
President Donald Trump.
Be sure to check back next week to find out what, if any, documents Fani
Willis finally does turn over to Judicial Watch!
Judicial Watch Sues Justice about Milley/Garland Meeting
In what looks like military coup-like behavior, it seems that Joe Biden’s
Joint Chiefs Chairman was busy colluding with other administration
apparatchiks, specifically Merrick Garland, against Donald Trump and
countless other Americans.
We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
against the U.S. Department of Justice for details of a reported meeting
between Attorney General Merrick Garland and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman
General Mark A. Milley in which they discussed President Trump and during
which Milley pressured Garland to target American “far right” militia
movements (Judicial
Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No.
1:24-cv-03380)).
We sued after the Justice Department failed to respond to an October 15,
2024, FOIA request for:
Records and communications including emails, email chains, email
attachments, text message meeting minutes, outlook calendars, voice
recordings, video recordings, correspondence, statements, letters,
memoranda, letters, reports, briefings, cables, presentations, notes, or
other form of record, regarding a meeting between Merrick Garland, Attorney
General, DOJ, and General Mark Alexander Milley, former, Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, concerning:
(1) President or former President Donald J.
Trump
(2) Domestic Violent Extremism
(3) Far-right Militia Movements.
The request asks that records be provided for the period from January 7,
2021, to October 15, 2024.
In his recent book,
journalist Bob Woodward wrote that in early 2021 Garland and Milley met for
lunch at the Department of Justice. They discussed then-former President
Donald J. Trump, and Chairman Milley pressed the attorney general to
investigate domestic threats and “far-right militia groups.” Woodward
described the meeting as “highly unusual, if not unprecedented.”
Milley and Garland’s reported meeting about targeting President Trump and
other American citizens further demonstrates the Biden administration was
and is at odds with the foundational principles of our constitutional
republic. And that the Justice Department would flout FOIA law to hide the
details of this conspiracy meeting speaks volumes about its contempt for
the rule of law.
$67.5 Billion Saved after Federal Agencies are Directed to Improve
Efficiency
President Trump and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
lieutenants can’t come soon enough, as our Corruption Chronicles
blog points
out.
Demonstrating the need for President-elect Donald Trump’s new Department
of Government Efficiency, the investigative arm of Congress had to
direct some government agencies to “improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of federal programs” in order to save a colossal $67.5
billion in fiscal year 2024, which ended in September. Otherwise,
American taxpayers would be forced to pick up the tab for yet more
government waste, which is rampant and has long persisted under both
Democratic and Republican administrations.
To save the tens of billions, seemingly a
drop in the bucket considering the government spent $6.75 trillion in fiscal year
2024, the few federal agencies involved had to receive instructions from
the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The nonpartisan and independent
Congressional watchdog examines how taxpayer dollars are spent and provides
lawmakers with objective and fact-based information to help the government
save money and work more efficiently. Here are some examples that led to
the latest savings. The GAO directed Medicaid to better align states’
estimates for demonstrations with recent costs, saving $13.4 billion. The
Department of Energy (DOE) halted construction on a facility that is no
longer necessary for treating nuclear and hazardous waste, saving $6
billion. The Department of Defense (DOD) was instructed to identify
improper payments, errors, and fraud, resulting in $4.8 billion in savings.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) was forced to crack down on the
rampant fraud of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) that doled out
monstrous sums of money to small businesses recovering from the pandemic,
resulting in the decline of $2.1 billion in ineligible or fraudulent
applicants.
The list of examples continues and can be
viewed in detail in the GAO’s lengthy report, which
was recently released to the public and covers the agency’s overall
performance and accountability for 2024. The watchdog estimates that the
questionable programs it is currently targeting will save American
taxpayers at least $50 billion in fiscal year 2025. The GAO has cracked
down on tens of thousands of reckless government programs since 2002,
saving approximately $1.45 trillion. However, many federal agencies have
blown off thousands of recommendations that could result in $106 billion to
$208 billion in financial benefits, according to GAO estimates. The
congressional watchdog implies that it more than earns its keep with a
budget that is a lot smaller—$811.9 million in fiscal year 2024—than
the money it saves taxpayers by promoting better management throughout
government, which should occur without the GAO’s mandates.
Careless spending has long been an issue for
government agencies, which are typically bloated and mismanaged, and the
problem has worsened significantly under the Biden administration
illustrating a need for the Department of Government Efficiency. The office
will be headed by billionaire Elon Musk, the head of electric car company
Tesla, rocket company SpaceX and social media platform X and Vivek
Ramaswamy, a pharmaceutical entrepreneur and Yale Law School graduate.
Besides cutting wasteful spending the new department will be tasked with
dismantling government bureaucracy, slashing excess regulations, and
restructuring federal agencies. It will send shockwaves through the system,
and anyone involved in government waste, according to Musk.
Judicial Watch has for decades exposed
enormous amounts of government waste and this year alone has reported on
well over a billion dollars in reckless
spending, just a snippet of a widespread
issue. That does not include mandatory spending such as Social Security,
Medicare or military and homeland security, areas that are also plagued by
waste. There is a category listed as “other” in which the government
doled out an astonishing $238 billion in fiscal year 2024 and some of the
allocations are downright outrageous. Examples range from $15 million to
fight climate change in an Islamic nation that hates America and serves as
a recruiting ground for terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda Indian
Subcontinent (AQIS) and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to half
a billion dollars to build electric vehicle charges in mostly underserved
communities to $2 million to combat corruption in Mexican sports
betting.
Until next week,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIGHTS
AND FREEDOMS IN PERIL
"When it comes to fighting
for the American people’s ‘right to know,’ no one holds a candle to
Tom Fitton and his team at Judicial Watch" - Sean
Hannity
Tom Fitton returns with an exhaustive investigation into the progressive
movement’s efforts to dismantle the venerable institutions of American
rights and freedoms.
Order Tom Fitton's
Must-Read Today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|