Breaking down the news with data, charts, and maps.
Happy Thursday! In today’s newsletter, we explore the ideological imbalance in public policy schools, the impact of tariffs on households, and the rightward shift of working-class voters.

Edited by Sutton Houser and James Desio

Did a friend send you this email? Subscribe <[link removed]> today! For inquiries, email [email protected] <[link removed]>.
1. Outnumbered 9 to 1 in Policy Schools
Topline: Within the debate about higher education’s leftward tilt, AEI’s Rick Hess finds <[link removed]> that public policy schools reflect an even greater left-leaning bias. In America’s top 10 public policy schools, tenure-track facility with left-leaning affiliations outnumber their conservative colleagues by about 9 to 1.

Ideological Imbalance: While some argue the ideological imbalance is due to insufficient conservative applicants, Hess notes that since these schools often hire former government officials, it reasons that Republicans should make
up about half the applicants.

Why Does It Matter? Public policy schools exist to educate the next generation of public servants, who often go on to occupy positions of influence in public life. Hess writes that balancing the ideology of these schools’ faculty would better prepare students to understand people and ideas across the political spectrum.
2. Impact of Tariffs on Households
Topline: Examining President-elect Donald Trump’s tariff proposals, AEI’s Phil Gramm argues <[link removed]> these policies could undercut the rest of Trump’s economic agenda. Gramm points out that an across-the-board tariff of at least 10% would likely hurt lower-income households and reduce wages.

Who Pays? He notes that the burden of the tariffs would be regressive, hurting lower and middle-income households more than higher-income households. A report <[link removed]> from the Peterson Institute finds households in the bottom quintile would get hit the hardest by tariffs, with their purchasing power reduced by 4.2%, compared to less than 1% for the highest-quintile households.

Wage Woes: Gramm explains that imposing across-the-board tariffs would diminish wages as companies reshore the production of goods in the US. Competition of US companies would also suffer as the costs of production and component parts increase.




“The decline in economic growth caused by tariffs—along with reduced wages and income-tax collections—would at least
partially offset any additional customs revenues.” 
—Phil Gramm
3. Dems Lose Working-Class Voters
Topline: What happened to the Democrats’ identity as the party of the working class? AEI’s Ruy Teixeira explains <[link removed]> why working-class voters feel, for the first time in 80
years, that Democrats are focused more on cultural issues than on economic security.

2012 vs. 2024: The recent election reveals nonwhite working-class voters are increasingly shifting away from the Democratic Party. With Kamala Harris at the top of the ticket, nonwhite working-class voters’ support for Democrats decreased 16 points from Joe Biden’s victory in 2020 and 35 points from Barack
Obama’s victory in 2012.

The Trade-Off: Working-class voters view Democrats’ emphasis on a cultural agenda as a direct disregard for economic issues like inflation. These cultural issues cater to more liberal college-educated voters. Among swing voters, excessive focus on cultural issues was the most important reason voters chose Trump over Harris.




“The time, energy and resources spent on the Democrats’ cultural left agenda is time, energy, and resources taken away from
promoting the economic welfare of the working class.” 
—Ruy Teixeira
Last but Not Least . . .
Climate Pragmatism at the Department of Energy <[link removed]>
Underperforming Students, Overachieving Economy <[link removed]>
Special thanks to Carter Hutchinson and Drew Kirkpatrick!
Thanks for reading. We will be back with more data next Thursday!

For more data insights, subscribe today <[link removed]>.

Email us <[link removed]> with data questions or ideas.
View online <[[[link removed]]]>  |   Ensure delivery <[link removed]>  |   Subscribe <[link removed]>


American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
1789 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036
202.862.5800  |  www.aei.org <[link removed]>


<[link removed]>   <[link removed]>   <[link removed]>   <[link removed]>    <[link removed]>  
<[link removed]> Donate to AEI <[link removed]> in support of defending and promoting freedom, opportunity, and enterprise.
This message is for: [email protected] <[email protected]> | Manage preferences <[link removed]> or Unsubscribe <[link removed]>

<!-- This is a comment -->