From National Association of Scholars <[email protected]>
Subject Irrational Exuberance
Date December 3, 2024 7:15 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Higher ed is changing quickly. Let’s take advantage of the opportunity

View email in browser. ([link removed])
[link removed]

CounterCurrent:
Irrational Exuberance
Higher ed is changing quickly. Let’s take advantage of the opportunity

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Future of Higher Ed, Current Events, Higher Ed;
Reading Time: ~5 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------


**
------------------------------------------------------------

“Free college for all” used to be all the rage. Where did it go?

The idea that every American should attend college has been drilled into our collective consciousness, thanks mostly to talking points from Democrats. But Republicans too have engaged with this idea by expanding student aid and eligibility.

In 2016 and 2020, the mantra “college for all” was featured heavily in the Democratic Party’s platform. Many candidates catered to college age voters by further encouraging student loan forgiveness. These policy initiatives, if enacted, would have been a boon to colleges and universities navigating strict budgets.

And yet, Americans have continued to shy away from college. Enrollment is down nearly one million since 2019. More Americans say they have little or no confidence in higher education. And with federal COVID-19 funds drying up, many small institutions are closing at a rapid clip—72 in the past four years. This demographic trouble has left colleges and universities vulnerable.

In the 2024 election, both Harris and Biden avoided “free college for all” rhetoric. Perhaps the Democratic Party received the hint this cycle: Americans no longer believe in higher education. The public has been priced out ([link removed]) and ideologically sidelined ([link removed]) .

All of this leaves me wondering, has the college bubble finally burst?

After the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis many, many, authors set out to nail down a single cause. Irrational exuberance featured heavily as a potential hypothesis. In a book of the same name, Robert J. Shiller argues that this psychological contagion—this exuberance—placed blinders on investors who likely otherwise would have seen signs of the impending crash. Of course, this theory doesn’t explain it all: corrupt rating agencies, failed regulation, and complex financial tools contributed to the crisis. But irrational exuberance, especially in the form of housing for everyone sponsored by government subsidized mortgages played an outsized role.

Are American colleges facing a similar fate? Four decades of pushing students onward to college. The gutting of apprenticeship programs. Accrediting agencies ([link removed]) that shelter mediocrity and impose ideological standards. Subsidized student loans and grants that pay for the lion’s share of university budgets, and, in turn, artificially inflate tuition and student aid ceilings.

American policymakers and higher education leaders have been too cavalier, perhaps in their own exuberance they’ve spread the social contagion to the rest of us. Everyone must go to college. The party must go on.

But the times they are a-changin’.

According to Pew ([link removed]) , roughly half of Americans say it’s less important to have a four-year college degree today in order to get a well-paying job than it was 20 years ago. As fewer young men go to college, their potential quality of life has improved: in 2011, 17 percent of young men without a degree were living in poverty—by 2023 it dropped to 12 percent. This is partly thanks to state-based solutions providing better K-12 options for technical education pipelines. These policies have led to better employment rates for those seeking trade credentials.

The incoming Trump administration has shown all but contempt for higher education and the Education Department (ED). President Trump has advocated for a greater reliance on apprenticeship programs (the first administration attempted to expand programs through the “Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Program” which was dismantled by President Biden). The Administration has also encouraged federal agencies to do away with degree requirements for positions in favor of job experience. These policies further sideline higher education in the scuffle for federal funds.

Linda McMahon, Trump’s pick for Secretary of Education, is known for her practical ideas for reform ([link removed]) —primarily viewing education as a pipeline for workforce development. Of course, it’s worth mentioning that Trump has promised to close or dismantle the ED and drastically reform accreditation.

Some colleges and universities have smelled the winds of change too. Boston University has “paused” admissions for 12 humanities departments. As Peter Wood notes ([link removed]) for Minding the Campus, “I expect the [BU] administration there is looking at all sorts of ways to cut costs, and freezing graduate admissions in programs that can’t pay for themselves was an attractive option.” But Boston College is not the only institution. Other colleges and universities are slashing majors to cut costs ([link removed]) .

Others have pivoted to dual enrollment as a means to getting students on the college-bound bandwagon. While such programs have existed for decades, most were overseen by community colleges. Four year institutions are now sticking their necks out for a slice of the pie ([link removed]) .

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) scholarship is on the decline ([link removed]) , as we reported earlier this year. The Economist reports ([link removed]) that America is finally past “Peak Woke.” Let’s hope so.

Of course, irrational exuberance continues to blind many higher education leaders. Five selective colleges announced last week ([link removed]) an expansion in financial aid programs, some with plans raising family income thresholds to $200,000. Others have doubled-down ([link removed]) on their much derided—and costly—DEI programs or rebranding to hide ([link removed]) such programs’ ideological tilt.

Perhaps it's too early to announce the popping of the college bubble. But the rhetoric of free college for all is gone—for now. This changing atmosphere presents a grand opportunity to reform higher education. The National Association of Scholars has ready to go policies ([link removed]) to extract the illiberal craze that has dominated higher ed for the better part of a decade, and others to bring tuition down from its lofty heights. Institutions will likely close as a result, but a little pain is necessary to readjust higher education to provide the best possible education for qualified students.

Until next week.

Chance Layton
Director of Communications
National Association of Scholars

P.S.: I would find myself chastised by our development team if I didn’t mention that today is Giving Tuesday ([link removed]) ! If you’d like to donate to the National Association of Scholars you can do so by clicking here ([link removed]) . Your support helps us expand our programs, such as Minding the Campus and the Civics Alliance, and continue our work to reform higher education.
Read the Article ([link removed])
For more on the future of higher ed, current events, and higher ed:
[link removed]

December 02, 2024


** Activism Does Not Belong in the Academy ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Rebekah Wanic

In recent years, activism has become increasingly visible in academia, often permeating classrooms, faculty hiring practices, and research agendas.

[link removed]

November 29, 2024


** Two Essays on Boston University’s Decision to “Pause” Admissions to Doctoral Programs ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Cassandra Nelson and Peter Wood

Observers beyond higher education would do well to take note of Boston University’s quiet decision last week to “pause” admissions to doctoral programs in the humanities for the coming academy year—not least because the story is unlikely to end there, given current trends in undergraduate enrollments.

[link removed]

February 24, 2021


** Report: Priced Out ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Neetu Arnold

As more Americans attend college, costs rise, and more students fail to graduate, we ask, "why?" Priced Out details the spending habits of 50 universities across America and provides perspective from students, parents, and college administrators.


** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.

============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.

Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
13 West 36th Street
4th Floor
New York, NY 10018-7138
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis