From FAIR <[email protected]>
Subject Grading the States' Coronavirus Control
Date May 17, 2020 1:12 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Grading the States' Coronavirus Control Jim Naureckas ([link removed])

I recently wrote a Twitter thread (5/12/20 ([link removed]) ) about another ([link removed]) New York Times graphic feature that was a good idea, strangely executed.

The good idea, which appears on the Times' "Coronavirus in the US" page ([link removed]) , is to sort states in terms of how well they're controlling the coronavirus outbreak, using graphs of the daily count of new cases in each state. This seems like a good choice of metric and a useful thing to keep track of, especially given how fragmented the US response has been.

As for the strange execution—well, in the category of "where new cases are increasing," the Times (as of May 16) includes both Virginia...

NYT chart of Virginia cases




...and Louisiana:

NYT chart of Louisiana cases:




Under "where new cases are mostly the same," the Times includes both Arizona...

NYT chart of Arizona cases



**
------------------------------------------------------------



...and Montana:

NYT chart of Montana cases


**
------------------------------------------------------------




And labeled as "where new cases are decreasing" are both New Hampshire...

NY Chart of New Hampshire cases




...and Vermont:

NYT Chart of Vermont cases




So in every category, the Times lumps together states that are doing an outstanding job controlling new Covid-19 cases, and other states that show little or no sign of bringing the outbreak under control. Often it's hard to discern why the Times puts a state in one category rather than another, but the bigger problem is conceptual: If you place a state that is down just slightly from a peak in a more favorable category than one that has brought new cases down to zero, because in the former cases are "decreasing" while in the latter they're "mostly the same," then you aren't helping to hold state governments responsible; you're actually obscuring which officials have implemented an effective anti-coronavirus strategy.

To demonstrate what seems to me a more useful approach to sorting states' coronavirus records, I've made charts of each state (and selected territories) and graded them according to where they are between a peak of infection and bringing new cases down to zero, and whether the direction of the number of daily new cases is up, down or more or less plateaued.

I've used the site 91-DIVOC ([link removed]) to make the charts; I used daily new cases averaged over seven days to reduce noise. The charts are laid out in a linear rather than a logarithmic scale, to make changes more apparent; they are scaled to the state's own peak.

A couple of caveats: These grades do not take into account how high each state's peak was, either in absolute or per capita terms; factoring that in would certainly change the rankings of some states. And there is some subjectivity involved in sorting this way; any two people might come up with slightly different classifications. I'm confident, though, that this ordering gives a more coherent picture than the New York Times does of which states are having more or less success at stopping the spread of the novel coronavirus.


** A
------------------------------------------------------------

These states and territories have been largely successful at controlling the coronavirus—bringing new cases from their peak down to zero, or close to it. They each have natural advantages: Either relatively low population density or some degree of geographic isolation. But other places with similar advantages did not do nearly so well.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Alaska







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Hawaii







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Guam







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Montana







Average Daily New Cases

Vermont







Average Daily New Cases

Virgin Islands








** B
------------------------------------------------------------

The states in this group have brought new cases most of the way down from their peak, but have not yet brought them to zero. Both these states had particularly bad outbreaks.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

New Jersey







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

New York








** B-
------------------------------------------------------------

These states have similarly brought new cases well down from their peak, but seem to have plateaued short of bringing them down to zero.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Idaho







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Louisiana






**
------------------------------------------------------------


Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Michigan









** C
------------------------------------------------------------

These states are about halfway between their peaks and zero, and their numbers are headed downwards.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Colorado







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Kansas







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Massachusetts







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Missouri







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Nebraska







Average Daily New Cases

Pennsylvania







Average Daily New Cases

Rhode Island








** C-
------------------------------------------------------------

These states are also about midway between peak and elimination, but have stopped making downward progress.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Connecticut







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Florida







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Nevada







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Ohio







Average Daily New Cases

West Virginia







Average Daily New Cases

Washington State







Average Daily New Cases

Wyoming








** D
------------------------------------------------------------

Close to their peak, cases in these states (and one territory) are just beginning to head down.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

District of Columbia







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Iowa







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Indiana







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Maryland







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Maine






Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Minnesota







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Mississippi







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

New Mexico







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

New Hampshire







Average Daily New Cases

Oregon







Average Daily New Cases

Puerto Rico







Average Daily New Cases

Wisconsin







** D
------------------------------------------------------------

This group of states has seen their new cases decline considerably from their peak, but they are now heading back up.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Arkansas







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Kentucky







Average Daily New Cases

Tennessee








** D-
------------------------------------------------------------

The number of new cases in these states has plateaued near their peak.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Alabama







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Delaware







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Georgia







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Illinois







North Dakota







Average Daily New Cases

Oklahoma







Average Daily New Cases

South Carolina







Average Daily New Cases

Utah








** F
------------------------------------------------------------

These states have shown little sign of controlling their coronavirus outbreaks, with new cases continuing to rise. Unfortunately, they include the most populous and second-most populous states in the union.
Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

Arizona







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

California







Average Daily New Cases May 15 2020

North Carolina







Average Daily New Cases

Texas







Average Daily New Cases

Virginia







I want to reiterate that these grades reflect only the trajectory of each state's outbreak, and not the absolute magnitude of their peaks. It does matter that on California's worst day so far, it had 70 new cases per million, and on New York's worst day it had 588 per million. But in terms of guiding the national coronavirus outbreak to a successful conclusion—one that does not involve the virus spreading disastrously ([link removed]) through the entire population—the direction of each state's infection rate is critical. We need to learn from the states that have managed to control the coronavirus, and see what lessons can be applied where it is still out of control.
Read more ([link removed])

© 2020 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis