[link removed]
FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
WaPo: When Israeli Leaders Commit War Crimes, They Can Prosecute Themselves Ari Paul ([link removed])
Predictably, Israel and its allies condemned the International Criminal Court ([link removed]) for issuing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant (Washington Post, 11/21/24 ([link removed]) ). A press release from the court (11/21/24 ([link removed]) ) accused the Israeli leaders of “crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024.” These consisted of “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare,” “the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts” and “the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population.”
In addition to the US, Israel’s primary source of military and diplomatic support, Israel also received backing from Hungary ([link removed]) and Argentina ([link removed]) , two nations run by far-right leaders who seek to undo democratic liberalism (Al Jazeera, 11/21/24 ([link removed]) ).
** 'International Kangaroo Court'
------------------------------------------------------------
NY Post: ICC fake charges against Netanyahu and Gallant prove US must never recognize the court
New York Post (11/21/24 ([link removed]) ): "This latest effort is simply another part of the international push spearheaded by Jew-hating high officials around the world to delegitimize Israel."
There were also the expected cries of foul play in right-wing US media. The Wall Street Journal editorial board (11/21/24 ([link removed]) ) said Israel was merely acting in self-defense ([link removed]) because “Hamas started the war on October 7 by sending death squads into Israel.”
“The charge of deliberate starvation is absurd,” the Journal snarled, noting that "Israel has facilitated the transfer of more than 57,000 aid trucks"—in other words, about one-fourth of what Gaza's 2 million people would have needed to meet their basic needs (NPR, 2/21/24 ([link removed]) ).
Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz wrote in the Journal (11/24/24 ([link removed]) ) that he was “putting together a legal dream team” to defend Israel’s leaders, as if to present Netanyahu as a sort of global stage version of O.J. Simpson. If you want to gauge the seriousness of Dershowitz’s announcement, consider that the "dream team" will reportedly include Andrew Cuomo ([link removed]) , the disgraced ex-governor of New York (New York Post, 11/25/24 ([link removed]) ).
Fellow Murdoch paper the New York Post (11/21/24 ([link removed]) ) called the ICC charges “false.” “International Kangaroo Court is more like it," its editorial board mocked, "and one more reminder why the United States should never recognize the ICC.”
“ICC Unleashes Chaos, Antisemitism” read a headline from an op-ed in the Unification Church–owned Washington Times (11/22/24 ([link removed]) ).
** 'Authoritarians who kill with impunity'
------------------------------------------------------------
WaPo: The International Criminal Court is not the venue to hold Israel to account
What is the right venue, according to the Washington Post (11/24/24 ([link removed]) )? Israel will bring itself to justice if it's committed any war crimes.
While it's not surprising to see right-wing outlets waving away the atrocities in Gaza, it is striking to see the Washington Post—a vehicle for the establishment center whose slogan is "democracy dies in darkness"—not only condemning the warrants, but arguing that the court should stick to prosecuting enemy states of the United States.
In a brutally honest way, the paper's editorial board (11/24/24 ([link removed]) ) declared that Israel must be held apart from other regimes who do terrible things, arguing that rules needn't apply to the West and its allies, since they have the "means [and] mechanisms to investigate themselves."
The board complained that the international justice system singled out Israel for "selective prosecution" while ignoring rogue regimes:
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has used chemical weapons ([link removed]) and waged a bloody campaign of ethnic cleansing ([link removed]) in his brutal suppression of an uprising that has killed half a million people ([link removed]) , many of them civilians. ([link removed]) In Myanmar, military dictator Gen. Min Aung Hlaing ([link removed]) and his army have been responsible for bombing civilian villages ([link removed]) in its war
([link removed]) against the long-persecuted Rohingya minority. And in Sudan ([link removed]) , a new potential genocide ([link removed]) threatens the Darfur region’s Black Masalit people at the hands of Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo ([link removed]) , who is known as Hemedti, and his Rapid Support Forces ([link removed]) .
This is a gross oversimplification to the point of deception. In each of the cases the Post names, neither perpetrator nor victim are from countries that are signatories ([link removed]) to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, which means that it is extremely difficult for the ICC to claim jurisdiction over them. (Palestine, in contrast, is a signatory to the treaty that established the ICC, which is why the court has jurisdiction over that case.)
In the case of Sudan, the court did manage to prosecute pro-Sudanese government militia commander Ali Kushayb (ICC, 4/5/22 ([link removed]) ) and indict former Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir (Guardian, 2/11/20 ([link removed]) ) for atrocities committed in Darfur. This was possible because the ICC may also claim jurisdiction when a case is referred ([link removed]) to it by the UN Security Council. (The court’s prosecutor has spoken to the legal complexities of confronting the current crisis—ICC, 8/6/24 ([link removed]) .)
An innovative legal approach involving cross-border claims from Bangladesh has allowed an ICC investigation of Myanmar's genocide against the Rohingya to proceed, albeit very slowly (CNN, 7/7/23 ([link removed]) ). A similar approach might work with the Syria case (Guardian, 2/16/22 ([link removed]) ), but no member state has referred the case to the court (Atlantic Council, 9/26/24 ([link removed]) ), in contrast to the Israel case.
A more apt comparison would be Russia's war crimes in Ukraine: Russia, like Israel, is not a party to the ICC, while Ukraine, like Palestine, is. And the ICC has indeed, as the Post quietly acknowledges later in the piece, issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin. The legal complexities here are manifold, but the Post doesn’t bother to grapple with them, suggesting that it's the Post more than the ICC that's guilty of selective prosecution.
The Post went on:
The ICC is putting the elected leaders of a democratic country with its own independent judiciary in the same category as dictators and authoritarians who kill with impunity. Israel went to war in response to the Hamas ([link removed]) attack of October 7, 2023, which left 1,200 Israelis dead and another 250 taken hostage, around 100 of whom still remain captive. The ICC’s arrest warrant for one of the authors of that massacre, Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, who was probably killed in an Israeli airstrike months ago, looks more like false equivalence than genuine balance.
In fact, the court had sought a warrant ([link removed]) for Hamas leader and October 7 attack planner Yahya Sinwar (CNN, 5/20/24 ([link removed]) ), but the Israeli military killed him before the justice system could catch up with him (AP, 10/18/24 ([link removed]) ). If the court had not prosecuted Hamas officials, then the Post and others would accuse it of singling out Israel. When the court does go after Hamas officials, the Post claims it's political theater. The court can’t win.
** 'Vibrant, independent media'
------------------------------------------------------------
972: Israeli military censor bans highest number of articles in over a decade
Israel's "vibrant, independent media" reports that it is under heavy censorship, with 2,703 articles redacted by the military in 2023, and 613 banned entirely (972, 5/20/24 ([link removed]) ).
The Post then offered some “to be sures.” Yes, "far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed and maimed"; yes, Israel "has fallen short" on allowing in humanitarian aid. But it is the next part where one wonders if the Post board has left the earthly realm for another reality, in which Israel will be held accountable by—wait for it—itself:
Israel needs to be held accountable for its military conduct in Gaza. After the conflict’s end—which is long overdue—there will no doubt be Israeli judicial, parliamentary and military commissions of inquiry. Israel’s vibrant, independent media will do its own investigations. Some Israeli reserve soldiers have already been arrested over accusations of abuse ([link removed]) against Palestinian detainees. More investigations will follow. The ICC is supposed to become involved when countries have no means or mechanisms to investigate themselves. That is not the case in Israel.
Has the Post been living under a rock? The biggest story in Israel before last year’s Hamas attack that instigated the attack on Gaza was Netanyahu’s attack on the independence of the judiciary (AP, 9/11/23 ([link removed]) ), and Israel’s right-wing government ([link removed]) is continuing this effort (Economist, 9/19/24 ([link removed]) ).
As for the so-called free press, the government has moved to boycott the country’s main liberal newspaper, Haaretz (11/24/24 ([link removed]) ), pulling government advertising and advising ministries to end communication with reporters. Israel has also banned Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera (5/6/24 ([link removed]) ), and at least 130 journalists have been killed during Israel’s military campaigns against Gaza and Lebanon (FAIR.org, 5/1/24 ([link removed]) ; Committee to Protect Journalists, 11/25/24 ([link removed]) ). Military censorship of the media has also increased, the Israeli magazine 972 (5/20/24
([link removed]) ) found.
** 'To ensure impunity'
------------------------------------------------------------
AP: Watchdog: Under 1% of Israel army probes yield prosecution
In the tiny fraction of cases where soldiers were indicted for killing Palestinians, AP (12/22/22 ([link removed]) ) reported, "Israel’s military prosecutors acted with leniency toward convicted soldiers...with those sentenced for killing Palestinians serving only short-term military community service."
Meanwhile, there are isolated examples of the Israeli government prosecuting soldiers, but experts believe that most military crimes have gone and will go unpunished (ProPublica, 5/8/24 ([link removed]) ; Al Jazeera, 7/6/24 ([link removed]) ). "Israeli soldiers accused of harming Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over the last five years have been indicted in less than 1% of the hundreds of complaints against them,” AP (12/22/22 ([link removed]) ) reported.
When an Israeli court acquitted a border police officer who killed an autistic Palestinian man (BBC, 7/6/23 ([link removed]) ), the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem (6/25/20 ([link removed]) ) said that even the original investigation into the killing was “merely a fig leaf to silence criticism until the public outrage and media attention die down.” It added that, on the whole, “the investigation system works behind the scenes to whitewash the violence and ensure impunity for those responsible.”
Moreover, these investigations are largely of the "bad apple" variety, singling out extreme behavior of lower-ranking members of the military. Does the Post seriously expect Israel to hold accountable those at the top who are prosecuting the war?
Right-wing lawmakers are working to further block investigations, Human Rights Watch (7/31/24 ([link removed]) ) said, a situation that builds an increased sense of impunity, as 972 (8/1/24 ([link removed]) ) noted.
This doesn’t sound like a healthy parliamentary system with democratic guardrails, but a warrior state spiraling into authoritarianism. The Washington Post, too, seems to be moving away from liberalism and a rules-based system, and more toward defending Israel at all costs.
------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the Washington Post at
[email protected] (mailto:
[email protected]) .
Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread here.
Read more ([link removed])
Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
FAIR's Website ([link removed])
FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .
Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])
change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .