** CenterPoint lobbyist ghostwrote comments to support gas appliance rebates ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Karlee Weinmann on Nov 19, 2024 01:42 pm
Comments submitted to Minnesota regulators that support CenterPoint Energy’s controversial push to skew customer rebates toward gas furnaces rather than electric air source heat pumps appear to have been created and ghostwritten by a CenterPoint lobbyist – not the people who signed them, data attached to the documents show.

The comments come as the Minnesota Department of Commerce, a state agency that oversees the customer-funded rebate program, considers modifications to CenterPoint’s incentives. The Department will decide in early December whether to allow the utility to offer hefty rebates for furnaces, which critics say is out of step with state law and an improper use of customer money.

The rebates stem from the Energy Conservation and Optimization (ECO) Act ([link removed]) , which is designed to broaden energy conservation programs and support a shift away from fossil fuels through electrification. CenterPoint, which only provides methane gas service in Minnesota, is financially motivated to keep households tethered to gas appliances. Customers switching to electric appliances may cut into utility profits, which is less of a risk for dual-fuel utilities that provide both gas and electric service.

Comments supporting CenterPoint’s request for higher gas furnace rebates were filed last month by Golden Valley Heating & Air ([link removed]) , a heating and cooling company, and the Minnesota Blue Flame Gas Association ([link removed]) , a pro-gas trade group. Metadata attached to the documents indicate they were created by “Sorum, Peggy J.” Peggy Sorum is the name of a CenterPoint employee who was formerly registered as a lobbyist for the utility ([link removed]) . Utility employees may conduct certain kinds of political advocacy without meeting state requirements for registering as a lobbyist. She lists her current title as “Director – Regulatory Portfolio Management Organization ([link removed]) .”

When asked directly by the Energy and Policy Institute about the comments apparently ghostwritten by its lobbyist, a CenterPoint spokesperson admitted that the utility helps steer third-party filings.

“At times, we provide guidance and previously developed sample letters that explain how to best participate in the regulatory proceedings and to simplify what can be complex regulatory processes for those who do not regularly participate in them,” the spokesperson, Joshua Solis, said.

Solis continued: “Our education efforts with external stakeholders on CIP-23-95 [the rebates proceeding] include information on how to comment in this proceeding, but without directing the content of comments to be submitted.” Solis did not offer an explanation for why a CenterPoint lobbyist was listed as the author of multiple comments in the docket.


** CenterPoint ordered to rework rebates after favoring furnaces
------------------------------------------------------------

The apparently ghostwritten comments mark the latest twist in a regulatory process marred by CenterPoint’s misleading efforts to favor gas appliances. The utility had previously ignored state guidance to boost rebates for electric air source heat pumps – a critical, and increasingly popular, tool to decarbonize buildings.

Heat pumps are highly efficient ([link removed]) , keeping homes comfortable by pulling heat in during the cool seasons and forcing heat out during the warm months. Proven in cold climates ([link removed]) , they have proliferated in states like Maine ([link removed]) and are a centerpiece of incentives allocated through the Inflation Reduction Act ([link removed]) , the landmark federal climate bill.

The Minnesota Department of Commerce, which oversees the ECO Act rebates, had urged CenterPoint to include heat pump rebates ([link removed]) aligned with those offered by Xcel Energy, a dual fuel utility whose service territory borders CenterPoint’s. But months after initially signing off on CenterPoint’s rebate plan, the Department found the utility had not actually done so.

Instead, CenterPoint bundled rebates for heat pumps and furnaces in a way that obscured the imbalance between the two. Rather than matching Xcel’s standalone incentives for electric heat pumps – at $1,600, or $2,000 for cold climate models – CenterPoint set its heat pump rebate at $500, while offering larger gas furnace rebates. The Department noted the discrepancy, and ordered CenterPoint to revise its rebate program.


** CenterPoint proposal ‘not a responsible or prudent use of ratepayer dollars’
------------------------------------------------------------

In response to a March 2024 directive ([link removed]) by the Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Commerce, CenterPoint has proposed two approaches to modify its rebates: both would include heat pump rebates worth $1,100, approximating Xcel’s offerings per the directive. But CenterPoint is still seeking to bake in significant furnace incentives.

Under its preferred framework ([link removed]) , CenterPoint would escalate furnace rebates according to furnace efficiency levels: starting at $200 for 92% efficient models, rising to $400 for 96% efficient models, and soaring to $1,000 for 97% efficient models. If approved by the Department, CenterPoint’s preferred furnace rebates would mark an increase over the utility’s previous ECO Act rebate plan ([link removed]) .

The $1,000 rebate for 97% efficient furnaces is the focal point of supportive comments evidently ghostwritten by the CenterPoint lobbyist. But it’s a bad deal for customers, critics say.

“It is not a responsible or prudent use of ratepayer dollars to provide an incremental rebate increase of $600 corresponding to a 1% increase in furnace efficiency,” Caitlin Eichten of Fresh Energy ([link removed]) , a leading voice in Minnesota decarbonization policy, wrote in comments filed last month ([link removed]) . She added that CenterPoint’s proposed rebate allocations are “more in line with a rebate aimed at redirecting long-term investment in gas appliances than in effective energy conservation measures.”

Fresh Energy supports a second option proposed by CenterPoint that would cap furnace rebates at $600 ([link removed]) . By comparison, Xcel’s rebate program ([link removed]) offers rebates only for furnaces that are 95% efficient or higher, at a maximum value of $400.


** CenterPoint points to ghostwritten comments to persuade officials
------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the two comments linked to the CenterPoint lobbyist, four ([link removed]) additional ([link removed]) letters ([link removed]) submitted ([link removed]) by heating and cooling contractors and their trade group advocated for CenterPoint’s preferred option. These letters rely on similar arguments and in some cases similar wording.

Seeking to persuade state officials to approve the heftier furnace rebates, CenterPoint praised the signatories of the apparent ghostwritten letters ([link removed]) in an October filing of its own. In what appears to be an attempt to create an impression of organic support for the utility’s position, CenterPoint wrote that the letters provide a “unique perspective” and also thanked signatories for taking “time away from operating their businesses to participate in the regulatory process.”


** CenterPoint furnace rebates already among state’s highest
------------------------------------------------------------

CenterPoint’s proposal of choice would increase furnace rebates over its existing offerings, even though the utility has achieved program participation goals ([link removed]) at lower rebate levels. The increased rebates would exceed furnace incentives provided by other Minnesota gas utilities ([link removed]) , according to the Center for Energy and Environment ([link removed]) (CEE), an energy efficiency advocate.

In comments filed earlier this year, CEE included the following table ([link removed]) to show the asymmetry between CenterPoint’s proposed rebates (see CenterPoint Rebate “updated” amounts) and those offered by other Minnesota gas utilities.


** CenterPoint uses contractors to fight electrification
------------------------------------------------------------

CenterPoint identifies the heating and cooling companies that submitted supportive comments as “trade allies.” This is the term for contractors that participate in a utility-run incentive program ([link removed]) that offers them payment in exchange for each qualifying gas appliance they install.

The trade ally program is ostensibly designed to encourage the installation of high-efficiency appliances. But it appears the utility is using its trade ally program as a xxxxxx against electrification and a vehicle to push a pro-gas agenda, as several CenterPoint-aligned commenters noted that they heard about the rebate issue at “dealer meetings” with the utility in September.

When asked by the Energy and Policy Institute about its engagement with contractors on the rebate proposals, CenterPoint said that it “regularly holds meetings with trade allies to provide information about our energy efficiency programs. … Trade allies expressed interest in learning how to be engaged on docket CIP-23-95 [the rebates proceeding].”

It’s not the first time CenterPoint’s relationship to contractors has come under scrutiny in recent years. CenterPoint is the only Minnesota utility that participates in the “Builders Club” program ([link removed]) that rewards builders ([link removed]) who install gas appliances with points redeemable for luxury vacations, sports tickets, and other perks – even if an electric option can save energy and lower utility bills ([link removed]) . The practice continues a decades-long tradition ([link removed]) of the gas utility industry cultivating builders and contractors as gatekeepers in their fight against electrification.

This post has been updated to reflect that Peggy Sorum is not currently registered as a CenterPoint lobbyist, but that she still works for the utility.

Photo credit: Tilemahos Efthimiadis ([link removed]) via Flicker

The post CenterPoint lobbyist ghostwrote comments to support gas appliance rebates ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]




** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** TVA Documents Reveal New Details About How America’s Major Utilities Fight Clean Air Regulations ([link removed])
** Utilities fund Republican campaigns in pivotal Arizona legislature races ([link removed])
** Utility Industry PACs Benefit GOP This Election Cycle ([link removed])
** Utility members silent on Ohio Chamber’s opposition to Issue 1, but their money speaks volumes ([link removed])
** Issue 1 opponent Ohio Works’ funders include utility and gas industry-backed groups ([link removed]

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.

Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]