The buzz in the media world continues to be about MSNBC “Morning Joe” co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski revealing that they visited President-elect Donald Trump late last week at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
The two married-to-each-other co-hosts, who regularly skewered Trump in the past, are getting bashed online and elsewhere for meeting with Trump.
The Wall Street Journal’s Isabella Simonetti wrote, “The change in stance by Scarborough and Brzezinski was met with a backlash from the left and right, ranging from former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann to conservatives like former Fox News host Megyn Kelly and right-wing pundit Scott Jennings.”
In his Status newsletter, veteran media journalist Oliver Darcy noted that on the show, Brzezinski said, “For those asking why we would go speak to the president-elect during such fraught times. I guess I would ask back: Why wouldn’t we?"
“Uh,” Darcy wrote, “have you watched your own show?”
“The Daily Show’s” Jon Stewart also answered Brzenzinski’s question by saying, “Uh, because you said he was Hitler.”
The “Morning Joe” co-hosts explained their reasoning behind meeting with Trump, saying it was to “restart communications.”
And, look, one can make an argument that if co-hosts of a popular morning program on cable news have a chance to sit down with the president-elect, it would be irresponsible not to do so.
But was there more to all of it than restarting communications and doing the right thing journalistically?
CNN’s Brian Stelter wrote in his “Reliable Sources” newsletter, “According to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Scarborough and Brzezinski were credibly concerned that they could face governmental and legal harassment from the incoming Trump administration. Knowing that Trump has threatened retribution against his perceived political opponents, and that Trump has promoted lies about Scarborough and Brzezinski in the past, the MSNBC hosts decided to reach out to the president-elect.”
Scarborough said on the air Tuesday that all the negative reaction on social media is not reflective of “the real world.” Hmm. Well, true, social media sometimes can be a bit of a distortion of the real world, but that also sounds like Scarborough is eager to dismiss some of the very real criticism. It wasn’t just a few people on X.
He added, “We were flooded with phone calls from people all day, literally around the world, very positive, very supportive, going 'I understand what you did,' etcetera. All of us will do the best we can do and we're all working towards a better America.”
In general, much of the criticism against Scarborough and Brzezinski is from those who think they are normalizing Trump.
But in a piece for The Daily Beast, Keli Goff wrote, “To their credit, by reaching out to Trump, Scarborough and Brzezinski are proving that they are finally putting their audience first again. Their job is not to reinforce their friends’ biases, but to report and analyze the truth. You cannot do that if you insult and disengage with anyone who disagrees with you or attempt to bury anything unflattering to your friends. And besides, speaking to real-life people you disagree with is the only way to understand their point of view — so you can change it, if that is your goal.”
But Mediaite’s Colby Hall makes a point that many critics are making in the wake of the Mar-a-Lago meeting. Hall wrote, “There is no question that Scarborough and Brzezinski have been among the most vocal — and influential — voices sounding the alarm about a second Trump administration, sometimes resorting to shouting at the camera or holding back tears. Charlie Spierling recently unearthed a video of Scarborough shouting at an audience that ‘there is no meeting in the middle’ with anti-democratic Trump. The sudden pivot to making nice with the guy they were ill-afraid to compare to Hitler certainly undermines the ferocity of their former criticism. It also raises the question of whether those criticisms were fueled by opportunism rather than a principled position: are these just pundits who lost the fight and are now toadying up to the winner, because that’s where the power lies?”