This Fair Courts E-Lert highlights the Senate’s Confirmation Hearing for Judge Justin Walker, the Federal Judiciary’s request for additional funding for Covid-19 response, and more.
Donate
[link removed]
([link removed])
[FAIR COURTS]
FEDERAL Courts
Senate Moves Forward with Nomination of Judge Justin Walker to Influential D.C. Circuit
On May 6, the Senate held a confirmation hearing
([link removed])
for the nomination of Judge Justin Walker to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the second most influential court in the country.
Days before Walker’s hearing, D.C. Circuit Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan asked Chief Justice John Roberts to “assign another circuit to look into a complaint filed by the progressive advocacy group Demand Justice, which questioned the timing and circumstances of Judge Thomas B. Griffith’s retirement announcement in early March,” according to the New York Times
([link removed])
. Srinivasan’s request was denied
([link removed])
by Roberts on May 8.
The complaint
([link removed])
by Demand Justice had been prompted by reporting from the New York Times that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had been directly contacting Republican-nominated judges eligible for senior status or retirement and urging them to do so.
Walker’s nomination has been controversial
([link removed])
; as a protegee of McConnell, former Kavanaugh clerk, and one of the youngest federal judges at 37 years-old, he has only served as a federal judge in Kentucky for 6 months.
Federal Judiciary Requests Additional $36.6 Million from Congress for Covid-19 Response
The federal judiciary has requested
([link removed])
additional funding and legislative changes from Congress to help federal courts respond to the Covid-19 pandemic. Previously, the judiciary was awarded $7.5 million
([link removed])
in relief funding via the CARES Act, the $2 trillion relief package signed by the President in late March.
On April 28, the judiciary sent a letter
([link removed])
to the leaders of the Senate and House Committees on Appropriations requesting an additional $36.6 million in funding for “emergent needs such as enhanced cleaning of court facilities, health screening at courthouse entrances, information technology hardware and infrastructure costs associated with expanded telework and videoconferencing,” among other costs for probation and pretrial services and costs related to security.
The judiciary also urged Congress to implement 17 legislative changes, including proposals intended to protect incarcerated people and criminal defendants, address administrative court matters after the pandemic, and alleviate certain statutorily imposed deadlines in bankruptcy cases. “The underlying objective behind each proposal is to ensure that the federal [j]udiciary continues to meet its constitutional mandate while protecting the health and safety of court personnel, litigants, and the public,” the judiciary wrote.
STATE COURTS
Increasing Number of State Supreme Courts Address Unconscious Racial Bias in Jury Selection
An increasing number of state high courts are working to mitigate the impact of implicit racial bias in jury selection, according to The Marshall Project
([link removed])
In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court held that race discrimination in jury selection is unconstitutional in Batson v. Kentucky
([link removed])
, and since then, prosecutors have been required to provide a “race neutral” reason for striking prospective jurors. Despite Batson, the discriminatory use of preemptive strikes has continued
([link removed])
across the country because courts have been willing to accept almost any reason from prosecutors as race neutral, even if the result is an all-white jury.
Over the past two years, however, state supreme courts in Washington
([link removed])
, Connecticut
([link removed])
, and California
([link removed])
have taken steps beyond Batson to protect against race-based jury selection. Earlier this month, North Carolina became the latest state to strengthen protections against jury selection bias, with the state’s high court issuing a decision
([link removed])
that trial judges are required to provide more scrutiny for allegations of racial discrimination in jury selection.
Ohio Judge Postpones In-Person Jury Trial after Controversial Decision to Proceed Amid Pandemic
While most state and federal courts have opted
([link removed])
to suspend in-person jury trials to prevent the spread of Covid-19, a judge in Ashland County, Ohio insisted on proceeding
([link removed])
with what is thought to be the nation’s first in-person jury trial since the outbreak of the pandemic.
The defense attorney in the case, Adam Stone, repeatedly asked Common Pleas Court Judge Ronald Forsthoefel to postpone the trial, citing concerns about the spread of Covid-19 and reluctance from jurors about going to court. But Forsthoefel insisted on moving forward, even though the prosecutor’s office had no objection to the delay.
On May 6, Forsthoefel ultimately agreed to postpone
([link removed])
the trial after the Ohio Association of Criminal Attorneys filed a writ of prohibition asking the Ohio Supreme Court to intervene. (The justices previously
([link removed])
voted to allow the trial to proceed so long as Forsthoefel complied with social-distancing measures). In his order, Forsthoefel said that he decided to postpone the trial because he did not want to force the justices to “make snap decisions about a number of important constitutional questions unique to our current health crisis.”
([link removed])
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that works to reform, revitalize – and when necessary defend – our country’s systems of democracy and justice.
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
120 Broadway, Suite 1750
New York, NY 10271
T 646 292 8310
F 212 463 7308
[email protected]
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences
[link removed]
Want to stop receiving these emails?
Click here to unsubscribe
[link removed]
([link removed])
([link removed])
([link removed])
([link removed])
