Our job as citizens is to speak truth to power.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: November 15, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------


** Rutherford Institute Defends Gulf War Veteran, Challenges Efforts to Chill Political Speech Critical of Public Officials
------------------------------------------------------------

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — The Rutherford Institute is challenging attempts by government officials that could chill political speech which is critical of public officials ([link removed]) and informs voters of important issues.

In briefs ([link removed]) to the Florida Supreme Court, Rutherford Institute attorneys have come to the defense of decorated Gulf War veteran Christopher Crowley who was punished for exercising his right to political free speech in his home state of Florida. Crowley, an attorney and former political candidate, was charged by the Florida State Bar for statements criticizing his opponent during an electoral campaign for a state prosecutor position. Institute attorneys argue ([link removed]) that the prohibition of only those statements which attack the qualifications and integrity of a select subcategory of people in the judicial system, such as judges and elected prosecutors, serves only to display government officials’ special hostility toward critical speech which harms their own political prospects, which is precisely what the First Amendment forbids.

“No matter what their political persuasion might be, every American has a First Amendment right to criticize government officials or candidates with whom they might disagree,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Nowhere in the First Amendment does it permit the government to limit speech in order to avoid causing offense or hurting someone’s feelings, protect government officials from criticism, penalize hateful ideas, combat prejudice and intolerance, and the like.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

Attorney Christopher Crowley, a decorated Gulf War veteran who served in Iraq and Kuwait and was a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve for twenty years, was a 2018 candidate for Florida’s 20^th Judicial State Attorney position, which is the head prosecutor over several counties. Crowley ran against the Chief Assistant State Attorney in the Republican primary. During the electoral campaign, Crowley denounced his opponent as “corrupt” and “swampy,” raised concerns about her track record as a prosecutor, her familial connections to a suspected anti-Israel group, and what role she may have played in having Crowley arrested over a small campaign donation from a raffle.

Although there is no indication that Crowley recklessly made these statements in disregard of a high awareness of any probable falsity, the Florida State Bar, which regulates attorney conduct, brought a disciplinary action against him. The Bar’s rules prohibit attorneys from making statements attacking the qualifications or integrity of a judge, public legal officer, or candidate for election to judicial or legal office without having an “objectively reasonable factual basis” for the statements, which is not the standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to punish defamation. The trial judge found Crowley in violation of the professional ethics rules, claiming that he did not have an objectively reasonable basis for making the statements about his political opponent during the campaign.

On joining the case, The Rutherford Institute filed a Motion to Reconsider ([link removed]) based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Counterman v. Colorado ([link removed]) , arguing that the judge’s analysis violated First Amendment protections by applying an unconstitutional standard that would enable claims through the State Bar to be weaponized to chill speech critical of public officials. After the trial judge refused to apply those First Amendment protections to Crowley’s case, Institute attorneys advanced their free speech arguments ([link removed]) before the Florida Supreme Court.

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated, and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ftri-defends-political-speech-right-of-citizens-to-criticize-candidates-10463488 Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ftri-defends-political-speech-right-of-citizens-to-criticize-candidates-10463488)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2024 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])