From Shira Feldman, Brady <[email protected]>
Subject We're in courts all over the country
Date November 15, 2024 5:12 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Hi friend, my name is Shira Feldman, and I'm the director of constitutional litigation at Brady. That means I lead Brady’s Second Amendment litigation and its amicus work. I represent state and local governments whose gun violence prevention laws are being challenged in court and advise them on strategies for responding to such legal challenges.

If you believe that the courts should uphold gun safety, I want to hear from you. I asked the team to launch a quick survey so we could see where our supporters stand, and I'm counting on 500 supporters to submit their responses before midnight. Will you be one of them?

Should the courts take action to uphold gun safety?

[link removed]

One of the cases my team and I have been working on is Garland v. VanDerStok in the Supreme Court — the so-called "ghost gun" case.

Right now, very few states regulate ghost guns — dangerous, untraceable firearms without serial numbers that almost anyone can assemble from parts bought online or made with 3D printers. Garland v. VanDerStok is a challenge to a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives rule regulating these guns at the federal level.

The Supreme Court’s decision will determine whether our country is able to save countless lives — or whether more firearms used primarily in crimes are put on our streets.

And that's just ONE case — Brady is involved in legal battles all over the country, from appeals courts to district courts, fighting to end gun violence.

The battles are never easy, but many times we can achieve live-saving wins in the courts: in August, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision blocking a Missouri law that had declared federal gun laws invalid, blocked state and local officials from helping enforce federal gun laws, and subjected them to penalties for doing so. That was a HUGE victory for our movement, and hard-won.

We don't always lose, either — also in August, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision blocking a Missouri law that had declared federal gun laws invalid, blocked state and local officials from helping enforce federal gun laws, and subjected them to penalties for doing so. That was a HUGE victory for our movement, and hard-won.

And, friend, win or lose, Brady will never stop fighting, because we believe that the fight for gun safety extends from the courthouses to the legislature to our communities.

Should the courts take action to uphold gun safety?

[link removed]

Deadline to submit responses: 11:59 p.m.

Thank you in advance for your response, friend. 

Shira Feldman
Director of Constitutional Litigation



--------

This email was sent to [email protected].

To unsubscribe from this email list, please click here: unsubscribe: [link removed]

Friends, thank you for supporting Brady.

If you're in this fight to create a better, safer country for future generations, join Brady today by making a gift. [[link removed]]


Brady
840 First Street, NE
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20002
United States

The Brady Campaign is a 501c(4) and donations to the Brady Campaign are not eligible for a tax deduction. If you would like to make a tax deductible donation today, please consider making a gift to the Brady Center. Click here to donate. [[link removed]]

Emails are crucial for communicating with top members of the Brady Campaign team. To put an end to the gun violence epidemic, we need you on board every step of the way. However, if you would prefer to receive fewer emails, click here to update your contact preferences. [[link removed]]

Paid for by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, (www.bradyunited.org), not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis