From James at Full Fact <[email protected]>
Subject Confusion over the new lockdown guidelines
Date May 15, 2020 6:30 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Why were there mixed messages over returning to work in lockdown? 

15 May 2020 | Facts and news from Full Fact
View in your browser ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Confusion over the new lockdown guidelines
------------------------------------------------------------

Following the Prime Minister’s Sunday night announcement that some lockdown restrictions would be lifted, there was uncertainty over when exactly some workers would be expected to return to work, after conflicting information was given by government sources.

During his announcement, Boris Johnson did not name a specific day when these changes would come into force, although later said that other changes to restrictions on outdoor activity would begin on Wednesday 13 May.

A Downing Street press release mentioned Monday as the specific day to begin encouraging workers to return. It was then widely reported in the media that Monday was the day to return to work.

But on Monday morning Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab gave multiple interviews insisting that people return to work from Wednesday if they cannot work from home.

A Downing Street spokesperson told Full Fact the press release on Sunday said “from tomorrow” in order to “allow people to get prepared for the changes that would be brought into law from Wednesday”.

This has not been the only source of confusion over the new rules, with many online posts making claims about what they mean for other UK countries. It is true that Boris Johnson’s statement on easing lockdown only applies to England, as the governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are devolved. Much of what was announced on Sunday, like encouraging some people back to work, is true of England, but not of other parts of the UK.

Members of the government have also misspoken when discussing the new measures. Mr Johnson mistakenly said that Covid-19 could be monitored through the water supply, when he meant to say it could potentially be monitored in the wastewater or sewage.

And Mr Raab incorrectly said you can meet with both of your parents at the same time, as long as social distancing is maintained. This contradicts official government guidance, which says that you can only meet with one person outside of your household at a time.
Why were there mixed messages over returning to work in lockdown? ([link removed])


** Stop the spread of bad information ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fhealth%2Fcoronavirus-lockdown-work%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fhealth%2Fcoronavirus-lockdown-work%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Two police forces did not use the same photo to illustrate two different lockdown crimes ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

A post on Facebook has claimed that two different British police forces used the same photo of a car to illustrate two different crimes. This is incorrect.

The photo was originally posted by Cumbria Roads Police in reference to an incident they dealt with where a family was driving from London and reportedly stopped on their way to Motherwell, Scotland, for a three-day trip, breaking lockdown rules.

We couldn’t find any record of the tweet shown in the post from the Police Scotland Twitter account. Cumbria Roads Police have stated on their Twitter account that the tweet attributed to Scottish police is not real.

Screenshots can be easily edited, and if they claim to show a tweet from an official source, it’s best to search for that source or Twitter account yourself before sharing or engaging.
Read the check in full ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Photo tricks can make it look like people aren’t social distancing ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Images can be misleading. It's worth keeping an open mind when looking at photos that appear to show people ignoring social distancing rules, as fact checker has Rachael explained in this video ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
You could do this at home ([link removed])
Episode 5 of our podcast is here! ([link removed])

This week we clarified the confusion surrounding the latest lockdown measures
Listen and subscribe ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Also this week...
------------------------------------------------------------
* Health Secretary uses Facebook poll to estimate coronavirus tracing app take-up ([link removed])
* What counts as essential travel in lockdown? ([link removed])
* A scientific review did not conclude that there are no cases of children transmitting the new coronavirus ([link removed])
* This little girl called Alice is not missing from your area ([link removed])
* And no, The Control of Diseases Act was not changed in April to say you can be forcibly vaccinated ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])
Good information is critical right now. Can you help? ([link removed])

Since its outbreak, we’ve all been confused by contradictory information about the coronavirus pandemic.

With people’s lives and communities at stake, could you help more people access the facts?

In becoming a Full Fact supporter today, you can help ensure the most harmful false claims are called out and scrutinised before they become widespread.

If you agree that honesty matters, can you help uphold the high levels of scrutiny the public deserves?
Yes, I'll become a Full Fact supporter ([link removed])
I’ll give £25 to support independent fact checking ([link removed])

============================================================
Many thanks from the Full Fact team
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
You can ** find out how we’re funded here ([link removed])
.
Copyright © Full Fact 2020 - All rights reserved

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Full Fact
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United Kingdom
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp