Ottawa media reported recently that Prime Minister Trudeau boarded the Government of Canada's private Challenger jet to fly to Bermuda to attend the funeral of a family friend.

Reports indicate that this Challenger business jet costs approximately $12,000 per hour to operate. The round trip from Ottawa to Bermuda will emit an estimated 62,000 pounds of CO2.

I'm not mentioning these details to criticize the Prime Minister for attending a personal family friend's funeral.

Similarly, I acknowledge that this costly method of air travel is as necessary for our current Prime Minister, as it was for previous Prime Ministers, due to important security requirements.

That said,  many Canadians are similarly compelled to use their furnaces during extremely cold winter months when heating with natural gas or propane to stay warm.

Despite this, unless you heat with home heating oil (which the Prime Minister exempted from the federal carbon tax), you'll face additional carbon tax costs for heating your home with natural gas or propane. What's more, on April 1st next spring, that carbon tax rate will increase yet again.

So while Canadians are asked to understand the Prime Minister's need for a private jet, our requests as the official opposition—that Canadians shouldn't be penalized for heating with natural gas or propane—fall on deaf ears.

The Prime Minister and his Environment Minister continue to demand that Canadians "do a little more," while seemingly placing no expectations on themselves to change their own behavior.

This situation mirrors the issues with the former Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) program. In our local community, some citizens were later deemed ineligible for CERB through no fault of their own. Initially told they qualified, these individuals applied, only to be later informed that a mistake had occurred—they were found ineligible due to a technicality. In these cases, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) demanded repayment of every dollar disbursed.

Some may remember that a recent audit of Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC), by the Auditor General, found that 10 out of 58 examined projects were ineligible. These 10 projects received $59 million despite failing to meet key requirements outlined in the contribution agreements between the government and the foundation.

This raises an obvious question: Will these companies be required to repay the funds they were not eligible for? The Trudeau Liberal government refuses to provide an answer, and so far, there have been no reports of any claw backs.

This is part of an ongoing trend I've observed. The Trudeau government asks Canadians to do or pay "a little more," while the Prime Minister and cabinet show no leadership by example.

My question this week:

Is it acceptable for the Liberal government to maintain a double standard—demanding actions from Canadians that its own leadership fails to demonstrate? Why or why not?

I can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free 1-800-665-8711.