|
Hello Friend,
Join the EcoAction Committee of the Green Party of the US, Monday,
November 11th, for a webinar on the recent Conference of the
Parties (COP) on biodiversity and the upcoming COP on climate change. We will also outline how
climate work will be impacted by Trump's election
Speakers:
-
Alison Lam, Critic of Intergovernmental Affairs with
the Shadow Cabinet of the Canadian Greens.
-
Susan Phillips, Executive Director of Climate Generation.
-
Biodiversity COP
The global summit on biodiversity and
halting the destruction of nature ended in disarray on Saturday, Nov.
2, with some breakthroughs but key issues left unresolved. They agreed
on a global levy on products made using genetic data from nature,
potentially creating one of the world’s largest biodiversity
conservation funds. They also formally incorporated Indigenous
communities in the official decision-making of the UN biodiversity
process, in what negotiators described as a “watershed moment” for
Indigenous representation.
But while the digital sequence
information (DSI) fund plan passed at the meeting, it was unclear
whether there were enough countries still present to formalise the
vote. If not, countries could question the legitimacy of the decision
at a later date.
Observers said that despite the
agreements, Cop16 fell short of what was needed to halt the crisis in
the natural world, warning that many governments and UN officials were
not acting with the required urgency. They pointed to a lack of
leadership from the EU, China, Canada and others who had played a
leading role in helping to reach agreements on this decade’s targets
just two years ago.
Climate COP
A trio of reports released ahead of
next month’s COP29 climate conference in Azerbaijan all show that the
existing national policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions under the
landmark 2015 Paris Agreement will heat the planet by close to 3
degrees Celsius by 2100, as warming has accelerated in the past few
years. The plans “fall miles short of what’s needed to stop global
heating from crippling every economy, and wrecking billions of lives
and livelihoods across every country.”
To reach the goal of cutting global
emissions 40 percent by 2030, every national plan due early next year
has to include short-term targets for specific sectors like energy,
buildings, agriculture and transportation, backed by substantive
regulations. Right now, all the submitted national plans add up to
about 51.5 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions in 2030, which is just
2.6 percent less than in 2019, instead of the necessary 40 percent
reduction.
Many are calling COP29 the “finance
COP”, seeing it as an opportunity to align climate finance
contributions with estimated global needs. Yet despite this focus on
unleashing funds, nearly every basic element of the New Collective
Quantified Goal (NCQG) is still being contested, from the new target
and the contributor base to the scope of the finance involved and the
Paris Agreement articles in question.
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
created principles for carbon markets and ways countries could
cooperate to reach climate targets. While rules were agreed to at
COP26, negotiation has been needed to establish the necessary guidance
to operationalise it. Two successive COPs have failed to get Article 6
up and running.
Growing the Loss and Damage Fund. The
amount currently pledged to the still-forming Loss and Damage Fund,
whose board will be hosted by the Philippines, is tiny compared to
estimated loss and damage needs worldwide.
Getting adaptation on track. Adaptation
has often been overshadowed by mitigation, yet it is crucial as
climate impacts worsen. COP29 is a pivotal opportunity to prioritize
adaptation and secure the necessary resources. With some climate
change effects now inevitable, robust adaptation strategies are
essential.
|