From ASPIRE <[email protected]>
Subject The fraught future of women’s rights
Date May 14, 2020 3:01 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
POLITICO: “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s hospitalization [last] week and the looming end of the Supreme Court’s term raise the prospect of yet another prized vacancy for President Donald Trump.”

That’s right: Republicans are chomping at the bit to pack the Supreme Court with Trump loyalists -- even though just 4 years ago, Mitch McConnell denied President Obama the chance to place his pick on the Court, saying that the American people deserved to decide in an election year.

But Republicans have proven that, when they have the opportunity, they ignore the wishes of the American people and attack the vulnerable. Separating migrant families and putting kids in cages on the border, destroying the U.S. Postal Service at a time when poor and rural Americans need life-saving medication, and using the public health crisis to restrict a woman’s right to choose.

Trump has vowed to only nominate anti-choice judges to the Supreme Court -- and he’s already kept that promise twice. Tell us if you think he should get another lifetime pick:

Should Trump’s loyalists decide the future of women’s rights?
[Yes][No] >> [link removed]

Thank you for standing with us,
ASPIRE

TAKE THE SURVEY >> [link removed]







------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paid for and authorized by ASPIRE PAC. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASPIRE PAC
910 17th St NW Ste 925
Washington DC 20006-2641 United States

[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis