From Restore the Mississippi River Delta <[email protected]>
Subject Hard Questions Remain on Stalled Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion
Date November 5, 2024 3:26 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Hard Questions Remain on Stalled Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion

Everything You Need to Know About the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion

View this message on the web [link removed]

[link removed]

Hard Questions Remain on Stalled Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion

Restore the Mississippi River Delta is concerned about Louisiana’s rapidly disappearing coast, and we know you are, too. We want to keep you informed of the most critical issues currently facing our coast.

This email marks the fourth in a series
[link removed] expressing our concerns about recent shifts in our state’s successful and popular coastal program, including changes to the structure of our coastal program, the protection of coastal funding, and implementation of cornerstone projects in our science-based Coastal Master Plan. Get caught up on the latest developments and learn how you can support the coastal program below.

Louisiana’s premier restoration project, the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion (MBSD) continues to face construction delays while the public – and state legislators – wait for answers and transparency.

Here’s a quick recap of the latest on MBSD, but please read this entire post on our website here
[link removed].

Last month, Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board (CPRA Board) Chairman Gordon Dove spoke on the project at a Louisiana Senate Transportation, Highways and Public Works Committee (Sen. Transportation) hearing – but he only provided the committee with adverse impact findings from the project’s Final Environmental Impact Statement, while also failing to offer details on the “settlement” with Plaquemines Parish Government hinted at during a similar August hearing
[link removed]—leaving many senators seemingly frustrated.

Representatives from Restore the Mississippi River Delta (MRD), the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana (CRCL) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC) testified on the project’s benefits, financial risks of inaction and the transparent process leading to MBSD’s selection, funding and decision to move forward with construction. At the committee members’ request, MRD also provided follow-up information to the legislative committees, which you can read more about below.

The hearing was followed by a letter to the state from the Deepwater Horizon Natural Resources Damages (NRDA) Federal Trustees, in which the oil spill funding agencies expressed their continued strong support for the approved MBSD project, demanded a commitment from the state and warned of financial repercussions if the state fails to construct the project.

Read on below for more updates, what supporters are saying and how you can get involved.

Questions from the Legislature

For months, the Senate Transportation Committee has sought updates on the state's largest coastal restoration project, expressing concerns over potential project scale-backs to appease Plaquemines Parish Government. Despite requests, the state has provided limited details on construction, negotiations or project changes. In October, CPRA Chairman Gordon Dove revealed $519 million in sunk costs but shared few updates on Plaquemines Parish negotiations or CPRA's commitment to the original project. Committee members expressed frustration over the slow progress and lack of transparency. Representatives from MRD, CRCL, and TNC testified on project benefits, financial risks, and mitigation measures, with additional support statements from Plaquemines Parish residents submitted.

For more on the October 2024 Louisiana Senate Transportation Committee Hearing, please click here
[link removed].

Providing Detail for the Record (MRD’s follow up to Testimony)

In response to committee questions, MRD sent Senate Transportation Committee further details related to DWH NRDA funding, CPRA's authority to execute approved coastal projects, statewide financial risks of project cancellation, and positive findings from the Final Environmental Impact Statement. MRD warned that the state’s stance—that NRDA funds "belong" to Louisiana and Plaquemines Parish controls project decisions—misunderstands complex approval and funding requirements and could expose the state to financial liabilities. MRD emphasized the project’s unique benefits, including $378 million in mitigation funds, which remain on hold due to construction delays.

For more on MRD’s testimony in the Senate Transportation Hearing, please click here
[link removed].

Commitment from the Federal Agencies who approved the project

Following the Senate Transportation hearing, federal agencies including NOAA, USDA, EPA, and DOI that make up the Trustee Implementation Group (TIG) expressed concerns over MBSD’s status, seeking CPRA’s commitment to the project as designed. They underscored the thorough evaluation behind the project, its benefits, and the costly delays that any changes would entail. The agencies cautioned that if Louisiana does not proceed with the project as approved, allocated TIG funds must be halted and returned for future restoration activities.

For more on the Deepwater Horizon NRDA Trustees letter to the state, please click here
[link removed].

Important Issues to Watch For

The continued attention and questions from the Louisiana Legislature have put more pressure on CPRA to be transparent about its intentions regarding the MBSD project and its planned course of action – both in the courtroom and on the construction site. The subsequent letter from the federal oil spill funding agencies confirmed the warnings made by MRD and others raised the stakes higher for CPRA and requested a direct response and “continued transparent communication” with agencies and the public. This leaves several questions unanswered over topics that are critical not only for the MBSD project but also for future projects and business in Louisiana, these include:
CPRA’s legal authority as the single state entity responsible for executing restoration and protection projects in the Coastal Master Plan
Financial and legal consequences the State could face if the project is modified or canceled
Private sector response to the State if the MBSD contract is not honored

Louisianians Support Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion

Foster Creppel Letter to the Editor
[link removed], Plaquemines Gazette, Oct. 25, 2024
Randy Fertel Guest Column: Plaquemines Parish has given a lot to the country The diversion gives some back
[link removed], NOLA.com, Nov. 1, 2024

Editorial: State should get going on Mid-Barataria project. Future Louisianas will be thankful
[link removed], NOLA.com, Oct. 29, 2024

What You Can Do

Sign an Open Letter to Support Our Coast
[link removed]
Contact Us – Everyone can help! Contact us to learn about opportunities to get involved at [email protected]
[email protected]?subject=How%20Can%20I%20Help%20Louisiana's%20Coast%3F

In the News

Will massive Louisiana coastal project be allowed to die? Its future is now in question. (Oct. 27, 2024)
[link removed]
With massive coastal project stalled, feds demand answers from Louisiana
[link removed].
Senate Transportation Testimony Video Archive (Oct. 11, 2024)
[link removed]
"Smaller Mid-Barataria diversion likely, coast chief says. But details are scarce.” (Oct. 11, 2024)
[link removed]

For more resources, please click here
[link removed].
[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

Visit our website ([link removed]) | Unsubscribe ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis