From Gun Owners of California <[email protected]>
Subject GOC LEGISLATIVE SOS: 2 BILLS UP FOR VOTE
Date May 13, 2020 6:23 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Modern Collection

GOC LEGISLATIVE SOS

The Legislators have returned to the State Capitol and their brief
“recess” while sheltering elsewhere did not ease the Left’s goal to amp up
their anti-gun efforts. Now that they have self-declared they are
essential, the Assembly is holding committee hearings and the following
gun-related bills are up in Public Safety next week (May 19). In spite of
constraints presented by the COVID-19 universe, GOC is still waging battle
against these bad bills. WE ARE FIGHTING THE LEFT TO DEFEND YOUR RIGHT!

[1]AB 2362 – Muratsuchi/D

This bill establishes a “framework of fines” the Department of Justice can
impose on a gun dealer.

WHY IT’S A BAD IDEA: It’s premature to grant the DOJ additional authority
to penalize firearms dealers when they themselves have been lax in
addressing existing operational problems. DOJ has been unresponsive to
numerous problems with the DROS system (Dealer Record of Sale) and the APPS
(Armed Prohibited Persons System), failing to provide changing regulatory
information to lawful firearm dealers and missing the mark in addressing
the APPS backlog.

This could lead to needless, punitive measures against firearms dealers who
may have made an insignificant mistake – stemming from lack of
responsiveness from the Department. GOC URGES A NO VOTE.

[2]AB 2847 – Chiu/D

This bill would revise the criteria for “unsafe” firearms by requiring an
alternate microstamping method to be applied to handguns.

WHY IT’S A BAD IDEA: Even though this bill reduces the number of places
that a semi-auto pistol is required to imprint a set of microscopic
characters from two locations (the spent case and the primer) to one, this
does not remove our strong opposition. It’s been universally accepted that
it’s physically impossible for the firearm to imprint on the spent case,
and the requirement for firing pin imprinting is equally problematic
because it can be easily manipulated. The engravings on the tip of the
firing pin are 1/26th the thickness of a human hair and can be
removed/disfigured with a simple fingernail file, thus, what the bill seeks
to achieve is moot. GOC URGES A NO VOTE.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?
* First and foremost, JOIN THE FIGHT - [3]JOIN or [4]DONATE to GOC TODAY!
We can’t slay the anti-gun dragons without you!
* Contact the Committee members and urge a NO vote – you can find their
office phone numbers [5]HERE.
* Have your comments in opposition added to the Committee’s analysis of
the legislation. Private individuals can do that [6]HERE.

[7]

[8]HOME

[9]ABOUT

[10]BLOG

[11]JOIN

[12]Facebook [13]Twitter [14]Instagram

[15]

[16]

[17]

References

1. [link removed]
2. [link removed]
3. [link removed]
4. [link removed]
5. [link removed]
6. [link removed]
7. [link removed]
8. [link removed] /
9. [link removed]
10. [link removed]
11. [link removed]
12. [link removed]
13. [link removed]
14. [link removed]
15. [link removed]
16. [link removed]
17. [link removed]
Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

This message was sent to [email protected] from [email protected]

Gun Owners of California
Gun Owners of California, Inc.
1831 Iron Point Rd, Suite 120
Folsom, CA 95630
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

iContact - Try it for FREE: [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis