We’re in a new version of the Cold War, call it Version 2.0. Our adversaries today are the same countries we faced 50 years ago: Russia (fka Soviet Union), China, Iran, and North Korea. What makes this Version 2.0 is China is now our largest trade partner and economic competitor, compared to what it was in the 70s. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to suppress individual rights, as demonstrated in the Tiananmen Square massacre of liberty-seeking students in 1989. The CCP’s Made in China 2025 plan’s goal is to lead in 10 technologies, and Chinese companies are notorious for stealing American intellectual property. Democratic Presidents try to nuance diplomacy and wind up sending mixed messages to our adversaries. Republican Presidents come across as belligerent or unpredictable.President Biden started his term with a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, which sent a message of weakness to our adversaries. He’s done an admirable job standing up to Putin by supporting Ukraine, but his administration telegraphs our intentions by listing in detail the arms we provide the Ukrainians to avoid antagonizing Russia. Russia can simply stay its course well past the willingness of the West to support Ukraine.. Reagan used the CIA to supply weapons to our allies covertly. In April, the Biden administration restricted shipping 1,500 lb bombs to Israel to prevent them from using air strikes against Rafah, in Gaza. However, the Iranians fired drones, rockets and cruise missiles at Israel in April and October, so what kind of message does that send to the Ayatollahs? What we learned in Vietnam is the President shouldn’t micromanage warsEarlier in October as war escalated between Israel, Hezbollah and Iran, the Biden administration said the U.S. is opposed to Israel striking Iran’s nuclear facilities, and a few days later said the U.S. also opposes a strike on Iran’s oil facilities. The White House should instead say “no comment”! Strategic ambiguity is a key advantage over adversaries. For example, Trump publicly scolded Kim Jung Un that he’d wipe North Korea off the face of the planet, and then wound up meeting him with Kim in Singapore, Hanoi and Panmunjong. Many Republicans think his unpredictability shows strength, but when he threatened pulling out of NATO to force NATO countries to spend 2% GDP on defense, I think that emboldened Putin. |