From On The Docket, Democracy Docket <[email protected]>
Subject Philadelphia vs. Elon Musk
Date November 1, 2024 11:02 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
SCOTUS reinstates Virginia voter purge program.

[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

Friday, November 1
In 2020, Democracy Docket was the only news platform tracking every post-election lawsuit brought by Trump and his allies. For the final week before Election Day, we’re taking $20 off our premium membership ([link removed]) — you won’t want to miss out on the latest updates, so make sure to become a member today ([link removed]) .
** ON THE DOCKET THIS WEEK
------------------------------------------------------------


** * U.S. Supreme Court allows Virginia to continue voter purge program
* Philadelphia DA sues Elon Musk, PAC over $1M voter sweepstakes
* Republicans lose bid to disenfranchise overseas, military voters

------------------------------------------------------------


** SCOTUS
------------------------------------------------------------


** U.S. Supreme Court allows Virginia to continue voter purge program
------------------------------------------------------------

The nation’s highest court gave the green light to Virginia’s voter purge program, which targets individuals identified as “noncitizens” and has erroneously ([link removed]) flagged ([link removed]) the registrations of several longtime voters and state residents.

Over the dissent of its three liberal justices, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed ([link removed]) to reinstate the program implemented by GOP Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin. The decision nullifies a lower court ruling that ordered election officials to restore to the voter rolls nearly 1,600 individuals whose registrations were canceled or marked as inactive.

Pro-voting advocates slammed the decision, calling ([link removed]) it another example of the majority-Conservative high court issuing a ruling favorable to Republicans and harmful to voters.
[link removed]

The Department of Justice (DOJ) had sued the state over Youngkin’s program, alleging the program violates the National Voter Registration Act’s (NVRA) “quiet period,” which prohibits states from systematically removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election. A federal district court and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals both agreed that the program does likely violate the NVRA.

The lawsuit noted that Virginia’s flawed process led to eligible voters being wrongly purged. Longtime U.S. citizen and Virginia resident Christine Rabassa learned her voter registration was canceled since she forgot to check the citizenship box on her DMV paperwork, according to the complaint ([link removed]) . The Cardinel News spoke to Virginia voters, including one Trump supporter, who said their registrations were almost canceled. Read more about the case here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** LITIGATION
------------------------------------------------------------


** Philadelphia DA sues Elon Musk, PAC over $1M voter sweepstakes
------------------------------------------------------------

Trump-supporting tech billionaire Elon Musk and his political action committee are on one prosecutor’s radar due to Musk’s one million dollar giveaway to swing-state voters.

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner (D) sued Musk and America PAC this week over the sweepstakes, which awards ([link removed]) $1 million each day to a randomly selected registered voter in a swing state who signs the PAC’s petition “support the Constitution.” As of Thursday 11 people have won, including four people in Pennsylvania, according to the petition.

Krasner’s office said that Musk and his PAC violated Pennsylvania law by running a lottery, which must be regulated and administered by the state, according to the complaint ([link removed]) .

“The Philadelphia District Attorney is charged with protecting the public from public nuisances and unfair trade practices, including illegal lotteries,” Krasner’s office said ([link removed]) . “The DA is also charged with protecting the public from interference with the integrity of elections.”

A lawsuit seemed inevitable given the intense legal scrutiny ([link removed]) over the $1 million sweepstakes, with some experts saying ([link removed]) it could be a violation of federal law which prohibits paying for votes. One expert told ([link removed]) NBC News that the PAC may have found a gray area by offering money to voters for their petition signatures or referrals, not directly for their votes.

Either way, Musk’s PAC signaled ([link removed]) that it plans to continue the sweepstakes. Read more here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** VOTING
------------------------------------------------------------


** Republicans lose bid to disenfranchise overseas, military voters
------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans’ attempt to challenge the validity of ballots cast in three swing states by U.S. voters and military members living overseas has been largely unsuccessful, marking another failed effort at disenfranchising a vulnerable voting bloc.

This week, federal Judge Christopher Conner concluded ([link removed]) that the lawmakers’ bid to impose new identification requirements on military and overseas voters came too close to the Nov. 5 general election. “The individual plaintiffs … provide no good excuse for waiting until barely a month before the election to bring this lawsuit,” Connor’s order said. Read more here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])

Other judges reached similar conclusions. In a Michigan case, state Judge Sima Patel rejected ([link removed]) the Republican National Committee (RNC)’s lawsuit challenging the ability of certain overseas voters to cast absentee ballots and have their votes counted, ruling that the RNC filed suit too close to November. Read more here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])

Also, in a North Carolina case, state Judge John Smith denied the RNC’s request to disenfranchise certain military and overseas voters. Read more here. ([link removed]) And learn more about attempts to disenfranchise overseas and military voters in the upcoming election ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** DOCKET WATCH
------------------------------------------------------------


** The cases that could have decisions before Election Day
------------------------------------------------------------

Over 250 lawsuits have been filed so far this cycle and there are tons of key decisions we’re waiting on that will impact the election. Need help knowing what to expect? Docket Watch spotlights fast-moving cases and decisions that could come down any day now.

1. A lawsuit ([link removed]) before the U.S. Supreme Court that will determine whether Pennsylvanians can vote provisionally at the polls if their mail-in ballots are rejected.

2. A lawsuit ([link removed]) challenging over 277,000 inactive voters on Pennsylvania’s voter rolls. We expect a quick decision after yesterday's hearing.

3. A lawsuit ([link removed]) filed by Pennsylvania Democrats in Erie County seeking immediate relief for an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 absentee voters who have not yet received their mail-in ballots.

4. A lawsuit ([link removed]) challenging over 1.2 million inactive voters on Arizona’s voter rolls. The plaintiffs are seeking relief before Election Day.

5. A lawsuit ([link removed]) pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that will determine whether Washington County must notify voters of mail-in ballot errors.


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------


** When We Fight, We Win
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

Four years ago, Marc Elias wrote about the “honor, the anxiety and the anguish of litigating voting and election cases when democracy is literally at stake.” Now, he writes, “as we prepare for yet another high-stakes election, the professional naysayers are back. While we have seen Republicans boast about their aggressive litigation strategy, these pundits prefer to criticize both sides rather than speak in clear moral terms.” Read more here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** NEW EPISODE
------------------------------------------------------------


** When Will We Know the Next President? Your Top Election Questions Answered with Kerry Washington and Marc Elias
------------------------------------------------------------

When will we know who won the presidential election? How exactly do states certify results to the Electoral College? Actor and voting rights activist Kerry Washington has been on the campaign trail for the past few months meeting with voters across the country. Kerry collected voters' questions and concerns about the election and got them answers right from the source — Marc Elias. Listen to Kerry and Marc discuss everything you should know about what we'll see on election night and after on YouTube ([link removed]) or wherever you get your podcasts.


** What We’re Doing
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

Democracy Docket staff writer Crystal Hill wrapped up her interview with Tennessee U.S. Senate candidate Gloria Johnson, the last session for Democracy Docket’s 2024 Candidate Q&A series ([link removed]) .

This year, Hill and the writing team sat down with 14 candidates and learned more about their platforms, backgrounds and why they’re pursuing elected offices. Hill especially enjoyed interviewing judicial candidates ([link removed]) , who are often overlooked on ballots despite having significant influence over public policy. The biggest takeaway? Vote. Vote. Vote.
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

This is our free weekly newsletter — help keep it that way and support ([link removed]) our work. You can upgrade ([link removed]) to our premium subscription to unlock exclusive insights, news and more. For questions about your subscription or general support, visit our FAQ page here ([link removed]) . You can update your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) .

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Democracy Docket LLC . 250 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 400 . Washington, DC 20001-5825 . USA
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis