Today’s MESCs are facing a crisis due to the winds of change in the Middle East and their own ideological echo chamber

View email in browser. ([link removed])
[link removed]

CounterCurrent:
The Looming Irrelevance of Middle East Study Centers
Today’s MESCs are facing a crisis due to the winds of change in the Middle East and their own ideological echo chamber

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Foreign Influence, Current Events, Higher Ed;
Reading Time: ~5 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------


**
------------------------------------------------------------

During the Cold War, Kremlinology was a thriving field designed to train Western experts in the esoteric intricacies of politics in the Soviet Union. At graduate school orientation, political science professors told the warning story of doctoral candidates in 1991 who became experts in Soviet industrial policy only to become unemployed historians. Outliving a field of study and becoming irrelevant is an existential crisis for any academic; and yet, today’s Middle Eastern Studies Centers (MESCs) are facing this same crisis due to the winds of change in the Middle East and their own ideological echo chamber.

Two years ago, the National Association of Scholars described ([link removed]) how MESCs emerged out of a push by the United States government to develop “area studies” devoted to studying critical regions of the world and to help win the Cold War. The goal of these centers was to shift scholarly focus away from history and focus on the modern geopolitics of the Middle East, while training students in policy-relevant topics and honing language skills for contemporary diplomacy and intelligence work. Many of the founders ([link removed]) of modern MESCs were either veterans of the World War II Office of Strategic Services or connected to the Central Intelligence Agency.

When United States government interests commandeered academic inquiry, the state naturally focused on the Ivy League. Princeton University reshaped its old focus on “Oriental Studies” into a modern MESC that became a model ([link removed]) for others. The seed money ([link removed]) for these centers came from foundations that are household names, such as the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, and the Carnegie Corporation. In 1958, the passing ([link removed]) of the National Defense in Education Act allowed the government to form National Resource Centers committed to building Middle East Studies as a field. After 9/11, the number of active MESCs reached a peak ([link removed]) of 19 around the country.

Like much of academia, MESCs were politicized by the leftward shift of colleges and universities in the 1960s and 1970s. Scholars of the “New Left” steeped in theories of “intersectionality ([link removed]) ,” in which the world is divided into hierarchies of “oppressed” and “oppressor,” ultimately took over much of the field of Middle East Studies. The takeover of the discipline by leftwing ideology could not have had better timing with events in the region. The decolonization of French Algeria in 1962, the Six-Day War in 1967, and the Yom Kippur War in 1973 coincided with the American civil rights movement and growing antipathy to the war in Vietnam. By the late 1970s, Edward Said’s Orientalism added ([link removed]) theoretical depth to what was quickly becoming a largely anti-Western academic field. Blind ideological criticism of American foreign policy, portraying Israel as an illegitimate colonial
project, and placing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the center of an academic enterprise driven by current events and crisis, swept the nation.

Scholarship based on current events and hatred is never a good idea if it is to stay relevant and serious. Hyperfocus on attacking Israel and the West ultimately leaves research with a narrow audience. Building theory on current events risks making research quickly outdated and obsolete. Thanks to ideological myopia and an obsession with delegitimizing Israel, the new and emerging Middle East threatens to leave MESCs behind.

A recent report by Open the Books found ([link removed]) that the United States Department of Education funneled over $22 million to Middle East Studies programs from 2020-2024. Alarmingly, but not surprisingly, Open the Books found ([link removed]) that each university that received grant funding touted anti-Israel professors in their grant applications. Columbia University highlighted ([link removed]) professor Joseph Massad, who had called ([link removed]) the October 7 Hamas attack a “stunning victory of Palestinian resistance,” as a selling point on its application for funding. Indiana University did the same ([link removed]) with professor Abdulkader Sinno, who served
([link removed]) as “advisor for the Palestinian Solidarity Committee.” Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service similarly highlighted ([link removed]) its own faculty member, Fida Adely, who serves ([link removed]) on the Faculty for Justice in Palestine. While Open the Books rightly raises concern about the lack of federal oversight into who receives Middle East Studies funding and why, the changes on the ground in the Middle East itself threaten to render most of the field obsolete.

The Middle East of today is not the one portrayed by anti-Israel academic activists. The Abraham Accords that opened ([link removed]) peace and commerce between Jerusalem, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco are quickly eroding the premise of an “Arab-Israeli” conflict. Hamas, the terrorist group whose attack Massad called ([link removed]) “resistance” and who labeled civilians “colonists” is nearly extinct. Yahya Sinwar, the “architect” of the October 7 terrorist attack, is dead ([link removed]) . As of June, half of Hamas has been eliminated ([link removed]) . In Lebanon, Hezbollah is faring little better. Last month, Israel neutralized
([link removed]) 3,000 Hezbollah fighters with a single operation targeting their electronic devices. The Israeli Defense Forces have made fast work of Hezbollah’s leadership ([link removed]) by killing enough of its commanders to leave the organization headless.

Farther afield, the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have fired missiles at Israel over the past year. Saudi Arabia has quietly helped the Jewish state by shooting ([link removed]) some of them down. The Kingdom of Jordan acted similarly by intercepting ([link removed]) missiles shot at Israel by Iran. For its part, the Shia theocracy in Iran looks shakier than ever. Iran’s missile barrages have done such little ([link removed]) damage due to Israel’s Iron Dome and help from Arab neighbors and Western allies that Tehran looks inept and isolated. With its proxies increasingly neutered, Iran is vulnerable. The son of the last shah, Reza Pahlavi, recently outlined a vision
([link removed]) of Iran at peace with Israel in a prosperous Middle East. A month before the October 7 attack, India, the Gulf States, Israel, Europe, and the United States issued ([link removed]) a Memo of Understanding outlining an integrated economic system linking the subcontinent through the Middle East to the West. This is not the Middle East of postmodern MESCs, but one that is quickly undoing the constraints of terrorism and postcolonial rage.

For now, MESCs seem safe thanks to government largesse. How long the field remains relevant is another story. Academic papers branding Palestinian terrorists as “democracy activists” are quickly becoming as irrelevant as they are anti-Semitic. Anti-Western theories of intersectionality focused on imperialism and Arabs portrayed as oppressed are becoming ever more disconnected from a reality in which Israel, Arab states, and the West are not only increasingly cooperating but geopolitically aligning of their own free will and accord. One can hope that the Middle East Studies of today goes the way of Sovietology.

Until next week.

Ian Oxnevad

Senior Fellow for Foreign Affairs and Security Studies
National Association of Scholars
Read the Article ([link removed])
For more on foreign influence, current events, and higher ed:
[link removed]

October 23, 2024


** A Report on the American Classroom 2024: Is Free Speech Just a Matter of Process? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Joe Nalven

PEN America’s report on American classrooms paints a dark picture: legislatures are passing gag orders on college administration, faculty, and academic norms.

[link removed]

October 17, 2024


** ‘Alarming’: House Report Warns of China’s Tie to U.S. Universities ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Tate Miller

A new House committee report raises concerns about the security of U.S.-China university partnerships, warning that these collaborations are aiding foreign technological and military advancements.

[link removed]

September 27, 2022


** Report: Hijacked ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Neetu Arnold

Hijacked: The Capture of America's Middle East Studies Centers tells the story of how such research can become captured by activist faculty and foreign governments.


** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.

============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.

Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
13 West 36th Street
4th Floor
New York, NY 10018-7138
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.