Shot: The New York Times
New York Times (10/28/24) reports: "The window is closing for nations to reduce enough of the pollution that is heating the planet to avoid the most dangerous levels of climate change, according to scientists across the world. And the outcome of next week’s presidential election could determine whether the United States and other countries meet that challenge. If he returns to the White House, former President Donald J. Trump, who last month called climate change “one of the greatest scams of all time,” plans to build on his first-term attacks on the environment when he pulled the United States out of the Paris climate agreement and rolled back more than 100 environmental regulations. In a second term, he has promised to end federal support for a clean energy transition and hamstring wind and solar development while expanding oil and gas production — including drilling in the fragile Arctic wilderness. He has said he would again withdraw the country from the Paris accord and potentially go further, blocking the United States from negotiating future global climate agreements....'Energy will be front and center in terms of a Day 1, early agenda,' said Thomas J. Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, a conservative research group that promotes fossil fuels. 'It’s an issue that unites Republicans nearly unanimously, and President Trump has been absolutely clear in terms of how he views these issues.'"
|
|
|
|
|
|
"For politicians, climate policy was much easier to sell when it involved far-off, monumental promises. This is the first U.S. election in which it has become evident that though benefits remain distant, the costs are increasingly large and immediate. Voters see that—and by staying silent, it’s clear that Ms. Harris does too."
– Bjorn Lomborg,
Copenhagen Consensus
|
|
|
|
|
|
