Dozens of local governments ask for more money despite missing audits

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Should voters approve new taxes without seeing the books?
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear John,

As Californians head to the polls, voters statewide will be deciding on whether to approve hundreds of millions of dollars in local tax hikes and new government bonds. The problem? Over two dozen cities, counties and school districts are asking for more money, but elected officials in those jurisdictions don’t even know what their financial picture looks like.

In total, these local governments are asking voters to approve a slate of new taxes that would cost taxpayers over $118 million annually — in addition to $48.9 million in bonds — all while their Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for 2023 is still missing.

Local governments are required to publish an ACFR annually that provides a comprehensive overview of their financial performance and position over a fiscal year. The mandatory audits include information on revenues, expenditures, assets, liabilities and financial activities. They are essential to holding elected officials accountable for how taxpayer dollars are being spent.

But up and down the state, the same local governments that haven’t released up-to-date audits are nevertheless asking voters for more money.

In Humboldt County, voters are being asked to okay a new one percent “transactions and use tax” that will cost taxpayers $24 million annually. Likewise, the city of Woodland in Yolo County is pushing a similar transaction and use tax for governmental services that will cost taxpayers $132 million over 8 years. Yet neither Humboldt County nor Woodland have filed their ACFRs for 2023.

The problem extends to school districts. Siskiyou Union High School District in Northern California is asking voters to pass a $22 million general obligation bond to renovate outdated school infrastructure. The bond would be repaid through a property tax of $29 per $100,000 of assessed value. But the school district has not publicly reported its annual audit.

How can voters make an informed decision if they don't know where their tax dollars are being spent and how much debt their city, county or school district is in?

California’s total state and local government debt now stands at almost $1.6 trillion ([link removed]) , or about half ([link removed]) the state’s GDP ([link removed]) . When it comes to municipal finance, transparency is crucial because many cities are underwater. Too often, increasing taxes or borrowing more money via bonds is only a short-term fix to a long-term spending problem.

Due to an aging population, investment return shortfalls, and ever-increasing demands by public sector unions, many municipalities face massive obligations for pensions ([link removed]) and retirement benefits without a strategy to pay for them. As a result, they often raise taxes to fund pensions and benefits while cutting back on essential services ([link removed]) like road improvements, police staffing and infrastructure maintenance.

Cities may also issue pension obligation bonds in an effort to manage their unfunded pension liabilities — but because of the high level of risk involved, the Government Finance Officers Association warns against ([link removed]) pension obligation bonds. Pew Trusts reports ([link removed]) that “cities and towns in California issued about $7 billion in pension obligation bonds (POBs) across 2020 and 2021.”

While the goal may be to reduce unfunded pension liabilities, these bonds are ultimately debt for which taxpayers are on the hook.

School bonds are a hot topic this election. In addition to Proposition 2, which would authorize up to $10 billion in bonds for K-12 public school facilities statewide, as many as 267 school bonds ([link removed]) are on the ballot throughout California jurisdictions.

Before voters pass more tax and bond measures, they should ask their elected officials serious questions, such as:

* What is the city’s current financial position?
+ Have you released the most recent comprehensive financial report? If not, how can you justify asking for additional taxpayer money without a clear understanding of the city’s fiscal health?
* Are there alternatives to issuing bonds or raising taxes?
+ Could city leaders reallocate existing resources or improve efficiency to meet these needs without additional taxpayer burden?
+ Can they sell off property or lease it out to other entities?
* How much debt is the city already carrying, and what is the long-term strategy to deal with debt and unfunded liabilities?
+ Will this bond or tax measure exacerbate our debt obligations?
+ How will you manage the repayment without sacrificing essential services?
* What are the impacts on taxpayers, especially those on fixed incomes?
+ Have you considered how increased property taxes or sales taxes will affect low-income families, seniors and small businesses?
* How does this bond or tax measure align with our long-term financial goals?
+ Is this a short-term solution to a long-term problem?
+ Will the city need to raise more taxes or issue more bonds in the future?
* Are city leaders addressing underlying structural problems, such as pension obligations?
+ Have you considered the role that growing pension liabilities play in the budget?
+ Is there a plan to address these costs?

One does not need to be a finance expert to understand these issues. An excellent and easy-to-read resource is the recently released Municipal Finance Triage Guide ([link removed]) published by CPC’s California Local Elected Officials (CLEO) to help local elected officials better evaluate their budget practices.

To learn more about the financial status of your city, county or school district, you can visit CPC’s new interactive Local Fiscal Health Dashboard ([link removed]) , which evaluates local governments across 10 key fiscal metrics and assigns each a letter grade based on their financial health.

If you want to know if your city, county or school district has turned in their 2023 ACFR, you can find a full list of jurisdictions that have yet to do so here. ([link removed]) And, if you’re being asked to vote for new taxes or bonds, be sure to check out the chart here ([link removed]) to see which jurisdictions with missing 2023 ACFRs have put new bonds and/or taxes on this year’s ballot.

Managing a sustainable budget is one of the most important roles of local elected officials. Asking voters to make up budget shortfalls year after year means your representatives aren’t doing their job. Prudent taxpayers will keep that in mind when casting their ballot.

— By Andrew Davenport, Policy & Research Associate, California Policy Center
New Podcast ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #360: The Los Angeles Times Refuses to Endorse Kamala Harris
------------------------------------------------------------

For the first time in a century, the West Coast’s largest newspaper won’t take sides in a presidential contest. After criticizing laws that limit free speech, Will is cancelled by an L.A.-area chamber of commerce. California cities are eyeballing streaming services like Netflix and Hulu as a new tax source — by calling them a “utility.” All on this week's podcast with CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen. Listen now. ([link removed])

[link removed]


** ICYMI — Radio Free California #355: Prop-O-Rama!
------------------------------------------------------------

In this special episode of Radio Free Californa, CPC president Will Swaim and CPC's government affairs director Lance Christensen discuss the ten propositions on California’s ballot. Listen now. ([link removed])

More from CPC ()


** The Importance of Parental Involvement in Public Education
------------------------------------------------------------

There are many ways parents can get involved in their child’s education. Lance Christensen, CPC's Vice President of Education Policy and Government Affairs, takes a look at how parents can actively participate at school, stay informed and be the best advocate for their child in his latest column in ([link removed]) The Epoch Times ([link removed]) .


** ICYMI — Ballot-O-Rama: A Guide To California’s 2024 Ballot Propositions
------------------------------------------------------------

As spectator sports go, California’s ballot propositions have everything — drama, intrigue, the manipulation of language. But for the Golden State, this is no mere entertainment: the stakes are very high, indeed. The ballot includes 10 important propositions. CPC examines each one from both sides. Read now. ([link removed])
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]