From Ballotpedia <[email protected]>
Subject ICYMI: Top stories of the week
Date October 25, 2024 8:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Competing ballot measures in Arizona and Nebraska, top 15 ballot measures to watch
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
View in Browser ([link removed])


[link removed]

Each week, we bring you a collection of the most viewed stories from The Daily Brew ([link removed] , condensed. If you like this newsletter, sign up with one click ([link removed]) to wake up and learn something new each day.

Here are the top stories from the week of October 21 - October 25.

Read on Ballotpedia ([link removed]

BALLOTPEDIA ([link removed]




** Voters in Arizona and Nebraska will decide on competing ballot measures on Nov. 5
------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]

On Nov. 5, Nebraska voters will decide on competing abortion measures, while Arizona voters will decide on competing measures related to electoral systems.

In Nebraska:
* Initiative 434 would prohibit abortions after the first trimester, except for medical emergencies or cases related to rape or incest.
* Initiative 439 would establish a "fundamental right to abortion until fetal viability, or when needed to protect the life or health of the pregnant patient."

When Nebraska voters approve two conflicting measures, the measure with the most affirmative votes supersedes the other one at points of conflict.

Voters in Arizona will decide on two constitutional amendments related to electoral systems.
* Proposition 133 would add the existing system of partisan primaries to the Arizona Constitution.
* Proposition 140 would require primaries in which candidates, regardless of partisan affiliation, appear on a single ballot and a certain number advance to the general election, such as top-two or top-four primaries.

In Arizona, when voters approve two competing ballot measures of the same type (both are constitutional amendments), the measure that receives the most votes supersedes the other at points of conflict.

[link removed] KEEP READING ([link removed]


[link removed]



** More than half of elected state supreme court seats are up for election this year
------------------------------------------------------------


Thirty-three states are holding elections for their supreme courts in 2024. In total, 82 of the 158 elected seats on state supreme courts are up for election. Of these seats:
* 61 are held by nonpartisan justices
* 15 are held by Republican justices
* Six are held by Democratic justices

States have varying methods for selecting their supreme court justices. Of the states that elect justices, eight hold partisan elections for judges, 13 states hold nonpartisan elections, and 20 states hold retention elections. Illinois uses both partisan elections and retention elections.

[link removed] KEEP READING ([link removed]




** Ballotpedia’s top 15 ballot measures and trends to watch on election day
------------------------------------------------------------


On Wednesday, we released our top 15 ballot measures and trends to watch on election day. These 15 ballot measures cover issues including abortion, electoral systems, citizenship, redistricting, criminal justice, marijuana, energy, and education.

[link removed] KEEP READING ([link removed]




** Democrats and Republicans endorse competing candidates in Kentucky's nonpartisan Supreme Court election
------------------------------------------------------------


In Friday’s Brew, we previewed the Nov. 5 race for Kentucky’s Supreme Court 5th District. Pamela R. Goodwine and Erin Izzo are running in the general election. Kentucky's seven-justice Supreme Court is officially nonpartisan. However, Democrats and Republicans have both endorsed and donated to opposing candidates, with Democrats endorsing Goodwine, and Republicans endorsing Izzo.

[link removed] KEEP READING ([link removed]



SHARE THIS NEWSLETTER
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]

PLEASE DONATE TO BALLOTPEDIA TODAY ([link removed]

Access to Ballotpedia is free 365 days per year... but Ballotpedia is not free to operate. Every dollar given to Ballotpedia helps ensure we continue to expand our coverage of all elections in the United States. Provide your support today and give the gift of unbiased political and policy information to all Ballotpedia readers.

DONATE TODAY ([link removed]


[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]

Did a friend forward you this newsletter? Sign up here. ([link removed]
View our other newsletters ([link removed]

[link removed]

Ballotpedia is a 501c3 organization, established in 2007, to deliver accurate and unbiased information about American politics and policy. All gifts to Ballotpedia are tax-deductible to the extent of the law.

[link removed]

| |

Adjust your email preferences ([link removed]) | Unsubscribe ([link removed]) | Privacy policy ([link removed] | Advertise with us ([link removed]

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Ballotpedia
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • WhatCounts