Edits to a ‘Fox & Friends’ segment with Trump and a ‘60 Minutes’ interview with Harris sparked a question: What’s misleading and where’s the line? Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------

Good morning, everyone. Tom Jones is off today, but the team at Poynter is keeping tabs on the latest media news and analysis.


** Two TV news programs edited videos of the presidential candidates. Was it deceptive?
------------------------------------------------------------
This combination of images shows Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris at separate campaign events Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2024, in Duluth, Ga., and Aston, Pa., respectively. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, left, Matt Rourke, File)

Edits of videos of the presidential candidates by Fox News and CBS News have sparked a debate: Where’s the line between fair editing and misleading the audience?

Last week, former President Donald Trump visited a barbershop in the Bronx ([link removed]) with “Fox & Friends” co-host Lawrence Jones. Trump and Jones sat down in front of a flag draped over a beverage cooler and took questions from patrons and staff who had gathered to speak with the former president. Fox News aired segments of that conversation on “Fox & Friends” earlier this week.

On Thursday morning, CNN reported on new footage that revealed Fox News’ edit of Trump’s responses was heavy-handed ([link removed]) .

One of the barbers had recorded a large portion of Trump’s Q&A section with people in the shop. The more raw, complete footage shows Trump taking one of his customary circuitous and anecdote-filled routes to answer one of the patron’s questions.

From that footage, which the barber posted to Instagram ([link removed]) , CNN found that “Fox and Friends” aired clips that avoided unrelated stories and exaggerations by Trump.

“Participants had to repeatedly follow up when Trump meandered away from the original point of their questions,” CNN’s Brian Stelter and Liam Reilly wrote.

Notably, when an audience member asked whether Trump would consider eliminating federal taxes altogether, the “Fox and Friends” edit showed an immediate response: “There is a way.”

But the found footage shows that the former president had more of a meandering path to that answer, one that included mentions of the “death tax” and its implication for small businesses, as well as — CNN mentions — “the Keystone Pipeline, Ronald Reagan, Russia, and transgender sports players.”

This comes in sharp contrast to recent claims by Trump that a CBS “60 Minutes” interview of his opponent Vice President Kamala Harris may be “a major Campaign Finance Violation.” (PolitiFact rated that False ([link removed]) .)

Trump pointed to Harris’ answers in clips CBS shared on social media to promote the appearance, which differed from what aired as part of the broadcast. Trump took specific aim at Harris’ response to a question about U.S.-Israel relations.

He said this disparity was evidence that CBS edited the interview to make Harris look “more presidential.”

Some social media users claimed the interview was an "in-kind contribution,” which is a nonmonetary donation to a political candidate. Dan Weiner, the director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s elections and government program, told PolitiFact that argument is far-fetched.

CBS News said the full interview took 45 minutes, and it was edited down to 20 minutes.

Kelly McBride, senior vice president at Poynter and chair of its Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership, told PolitiFact ([link removed]) that this type of editing is typical for broadcast news, and is often due to time constraints.

In fact, news outlets across all mediums — print, digital, video, and more — routinely edit for brevity, clarity, and a host of other factors. It’s a standard, long-accepted practice. Raw, unedited video or transcripts of conversations rarely make it to publication outside of places like C-Span, in part because audiences simply expect a more polished product.

In that light, some of the outrage reflects a broader trend of vilifying standard journalistic practices. In 2022, for example, social media users erupted when journalist Taylor Lorenz knocked on doors to track down an anonymous TikTok user who had spread hate against LGBTQ+ people ([link removed]) . Door-knocking to verify facts or gather information is one of the most fundamental methods in journalism, yet it was portrayed as invasive or unethical by critics who were either unfamiliar with the practice or theatrically pearl-clutching to denigrate reporters.

In most cases, McBride told PolitiFact, broadcast news outlets edit video “to make the production more digestible for the audience, not to deceive, by either making a candidate look better or worse.”

It certainly seems like the edits “60 Minutes” made fall into that category, at least based on what CBS released that didn’t air on television. It’s not as clear cut for “Fox & Friends.”

Though Fox News’ edits certainly helped with brevity and digestibility, Trump’s serpentine statements have become a major focus in the election. With President Joe Biden out of the race, the 78-year-old Trump, if elected, would be the oldest president to take the oath in U.S. history. That has put renewed interest in his health and wellbeing — and a spotlight on his meandering method of public speaking.

Even if Fox News aimed to make a smoother news report, the “Fox & Friends” audience was left with a misleading picture of Trump’s sharpness.

Because CBS News hasn’t released the unedited, full interview with Harris, either in video or transcript form, Trump has been able to question the network’s integrity. “Once you cast doubt on something, it’s really on the news organization to explain and demonstrate why it’s trustworthy, and that shouldn’t be hard to do,” McBride told PolitiFact.

So while CBS News may have been in the clear to cut the interview down to fit TV, it may be in the network’s best interest to release the video or transcript to put this issue to rest.

Meanwhile, Fox News doesn’t really have that luxury. The full video of Trump’s barbershop interview on Instagram makes it clear that the network’s edits changed the tenor of Trump’s responses in a way that made him look more cogent. That’s deceptive.

By Ren LaForme, Poynter’s managing editor; and Josie Hollingsworth, PolitiFact’s audience director

A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
[link removed]


** Don’t miss the 71st Scripps Howard Journalism Awards!
------------------------------------------------------------

The winners are in! Celebrate the best in American journalism during the 71st Scripps Howard Journalism Awards. From groundbreaking investigative work to cutting-edge storytelling, the awards spotlight the news organizations and journalists who go the extra mile to uncover the truth and drive change. With $170,000 in prize money, the Scripps Howard Journalism Awards honor high-impact journalism across television, newspapers, podcasts and more. Don’t miss this showcase of excellence and impact!

Watch now ([link removed]) .


** Election night coverage might stretch on for multiple nights
------------------------------------------------------------

Television networks aren’t just preparing for election night this year — they’re getting ready for election nights.

Cable and broadcast news outlets are bracing themselves for the possibility that it will take multiple days to determine the outcomes of Election Day races and are planning their coverage accordingly, Variety’s Brian Steinberg reported ([link removed]) . That means round-the-clock coverage at some outlets, while others ensure staff are ready to break into normal programming at a moment’s notice to share important updates.

“I think you have to be ready to go through the entire week,” NewsNation president and managing editor of news and politics Cherie Grzech told Variety. “We will make sure we can sustain coverage throughout the week, 24 hours if necessary.”

During the 2020 presidential election, it took The Associated Press four days to call the race for Joe Biden. Many voters chose to cast their ballot by mail ([link removed]) due to the pandemic, and those ballots took longer to count, leading to delays in race calls. Though the percentage of mail ballots this year may not reach the heights it did in 2020, both Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign and former President Donald Trump’s campaign have encouraged supporters to vote early ([link removed]) .

Election result delays this year may coincide with the spread of misinformation. In 2020, Trump falsely claimed ([link removed]) that voting by mail was susceptible to fraud — a claim he repeated this year ([link removed]) . Network executives told Variety they are prepared to address election misinformation through their coverage as viewers await results.

When results do come in, they’ll likely be delivered by each network’s most high-profile anchors — Martha MacCallum and Bret Baier at Fox News, for example, or Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper at CNN. MSNBC president Rashida Jones told Variety that Steve Kornacki “has a window if he needs to take a few winks,” and other staff will fill in during those lulls.

“Kornacki is going to be on the set when that big moment happens.”

By Angela Fu, media business reporter


** Speaking of …
------------------------------------------------------------

In case you missed it, Poynter’s Tom Jones spoke with Kornacki for the third episode of “The Poynter Report Podcast,” ([link removed]) posted earlier this week. Consider it your 23-minute insider’s guide to what to look for on election night. If you trust Kornacki’s judgment — and I do — you might just be able to hit the hay a bit earlier on Nov. 5 with a pretty good idea of who will be the next president of the United States.

By Ren LaForme, managing editor

A NOTE FROM POYNTER
[link removed]


** Elevate your newsroom, accelerate your career
------------------------------------------------------------

Designed to reinvigorate the often-unsung heroes of the TV newsroom, Peak Producing, a seminar for TV producers, will empower journalists with the practical and tactical skills to create compelling, engaging and informative newscasts, programs, and content while managing the complexities of local journalism.

Read more and apply now ([link removed]) .


** Media tidbits and links for your weekend review
------------------------------------------------------------
* In yesterday’s edition of The Poynter Report ([link removed]) , Tom Jones wrote about how the Los Angeles Times will not endorse a candidate for president this year, a decision seemingly made by owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, and that the editor of editorials resigned in protest. Well, The New York Times’ Katie Robertson shared an email from top editors Terry Tang and Hector Becerra to Los Angeles Times staff addressing the paper’s decision. “Endorsements are made at the owner’s discretion,” Tang and Becerra wrote, in part.
* A number of high-profile social media users, including actor Mark Hamill ([link removed]) , said they were canceling their subscriptions over the Times’ decision. “I canceled our subscription to the LA Times because I want to make it clear that I am not okay with them being silent. In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up,” Hamill wrote. But the L.A. Times Guild put out a statement ([link removed]) urging readers to reconsider canceling. “That subscription underwrites the salaries of hundreds of journalists in our newsroom,” the statement said.
* Also in yesterday’s Poynter Report ([link removed]) , Tom Jones wrote about what the presidential candidates stand to gain by appearing on podcasts — a relatively new method they are embracing to reach audiences. But, David Bauder of The Associated Press writes, “By moving to podcasts, Harris and Trump are turning away from legacy media to spread their messages.” ([link removed]) Bauder notes, “Among the legacy news outlets that have come up empty in their efforts to interview Kamala Harris and Donald Trump during the general election campaign: NPR, The New York Times, PBS and The Washington Post.”
* Vice President Kamala Harris appeared in a Pennsylvania town hall on CNN on Wednesday night. Brian Stelter writes that the program averaged at least 3.2 million viewers ([link removed]) , according to preliminary numbers. Meanwhile, PolitiFact fact-checked some of Harris’ claims ([link removed]) , including her statement that the “former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has said (Trump) is ‘a fascist to the core.’”
* Bloomberg’s Amanda Mull writes about “The Print Magazine Revival of 2024.” ([link removed]) “More publishers are discovering that magazines are now a luxury good,” Mull says.
* As the host of “All of It” on WNYC, Alison Stewart has a gift for speaking. But, one day last winter, she found she could only say gibberish. The New York Times’ Julie Besonen reports what happened next in “Her Job Was Talking on the Radio. Then Suddenly, Words Wouldn’t Come.” ([link removed])


** More resources for journalists
------------------------------------------------------------
* Our OnPoynt ([link removed]) report offers a forward-minded look at the state of journalism and the news industry.
* Lead With Influence ([link removed]) is for leaders who manage big responsibilities but have no direct reports.
* Encourage an outstanding colleague to apply for Leadership Academy for Women in Media ([link removed]) .

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .
[link removed]
I want more analysis of the news media to help me understand my world. ([link removed])
GIVE NOW ([link removed])
Thanks to our sponsor [link removed]

ADVERTISE ([link removed]) // DONATE ([link removed]) // LEARN ([link removed]) // JOBS ([link removed])
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here. ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2024
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails ([link removed]) .