From Portside <[email protected]>
Subject How We Got to Sesame Street
Date May 11, 2020 6:29 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[The show was created to put kids’ screen time to good use. Half
a century later, how is it holding up?] [[link removed]]

HOW WE GOT TO SESAME STREET   [[link removed]]

 

Jill Lepore
May 4, 2020
The New Yorker
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ The show was created to put kids’ screen time to good use. Half a
century later, how is it holding up? _

Educational shows for kids responded to two conditions: the scarcity
of preschools and the abundance of televisions. , David Attie / Getty

 

In 1969, the Children’s Television Workshop made a twenty-six-minute
pitch reel to line up stations to air a radically new program that
appeared to have, as yet, no title. Instead, a team of fleece- and
fur- and muddle-headed puppets were seen brainstorming in a boardroom.

“What are those guys doing?” a dubious green frog asks, peering
into the room with Ping-Pong eyes.

“Well, you see, we haven’t settled on a title for the show yet, so
the guys are working on it,” a floppy-eared dog with a wide mouth
says.

The guys come up with some whoppers. Like “The Two and Two Are Five
Show.”

“Two plus two don’t make five, you meatball!”

“They don’t? Then how about ‘The Two and Two Ain’t Five
Show’?”

Then they try out a title that keeps getting longer and longer.

“Howzabout we call it ‘The Little Kiddie Show’?”

“But we oughta say something about the show telling it like it is!
Maybe ‘The Nitty Gritty Little Kiddie Show’?”

The frog, named Kermit, shakes his head at his dog friend, Rowlf.
“Are you really gonna depend on that bunch to come up with a
title?”

“You never can tell, Kermit,” Rowlf says, with a hopefulness known
only to dogs. “They just might think of the right one.”

Half a century ago, before “Sesame Street
[[link removed]],” and long before the
age of quarantine, kids under the age of six spent a crazy amount of
time indoors, watching television, a bleary-eyed average of fifty-four
hours a week. In 1965, the year the Johnson Administration founded
Head Start, Lloyd Morrisett, a vice-president of the Carnegie
Corporation with a Ph.D. in experimental psychology from Yale, got up
one Sunday morning, at about six-thirty, a half hour before the
networks began their day’s programming, to find his three-year-old
daughter, Sarah, lying on the living-room floor in her pink footie
pajamas, watching the test pattern. She’d have watched anything,
even “The Itty-Bitty, Farm and City, Witty-Ditty, Nitty-Gritty, Dog
and Kitty, Pretty Little Kiddie Show.”

Not much later, Morrisett fell into a dinner-party conversation with
Joan Ganz Cooney, a public-affairs producer at New York’s Channel
13. The first time Cooney had seen a television set was in 1952, when
she watched Adlai Stevenson accept the Democratic nomination. She’d
gone on to champion Democratic causes and had moved from Phoenix to
New York to work at Channel 13, where her documentary projects
included “A Chance at the Beginning,” about a preschool program in
Harlem. As David Kamp reports in “Sunny Days: The Children’s
Television Revolution That Changed America
[[link removed]]”
(Simon & Schuster), both Cooney and Morrisett were caught up in Lyndon
Johnson’s vision of a Great Society, his War on Poverty, and the
promise of the civil-rights movement, and they’d both been stirred
by a speech delivered in 1961 by Newton Minow, President Kennedy’s
F.C.C. chairman, which called television a “vast wasteland.”
Minow, a former law partner of Stevenson’s, had gone on to rescue
Channel 13’s public-broadcast mandate during a takeover bid. At that
dinner party, Cooney and Morrisett got to talking about whether
public-minded television might be able to educate young kids.

Educational television for preschoolers seemed to solve two problems
at once: the scarcity of preschools and the abundance of televisions.
At the time, half of the nation’s school districts didn’t have
kindergartens. To address an achievement gap that had persisted long
after Brown v. Board of Education, it would have been better to have
universal kindergarten, and universal preschool, but, in the meantime,
there was universal television. “More households have televisions
than bathtubs, telephones, vacuum cleaners, toasters, or a regular
daily newspaper,” Cooney noted in a Carnegie-funded feasibility
study, “The Potential Uses of Television in Preschool Education.”
With that report in hand, Morrisett arranged for a million-dollar
grant that allowed Cooney to begin development of a show with no other
title than “Early Childhood Television Program.” In a
fifty-five-page 1968 proposal, “Television for Preschool
Children,” Cooney reported the results of a national study of the
increasingly sophisticated scholarship on child development: she’d
travelled the country, interviewing scholars and visiting preschools
to find out about what was called, at the time, the
“sandbox-to-classroom revolution”—the pressing case for
intellectual stimulation for three-, four-, and five-year-olds.

That proposal brought in the eight million dollars in foundation and
government funding that made possible the founding of the nonprofit
Children’s Television Workshop and the production of the first
season of the still unnamed “Early Childhood Television Program.”
“Nothing comparable to such a program now exists on television,”
Cooney observed. “Captain Kangaroo,” broadcast on CBS beginning in
1955, had educational bits, but it was mainly goofy. (Bob Keeshan, who
played the captain, had started out as a Sideshow Bob clown named
Clarabell on “Howdy Doody” and then starred as Corny the Clown on
ABC’s “Time for Fun.”) “Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood,” a
half-hour show produced by WQED, in black-and-white, had gone national
in 1968, but reached mainly a middle-class audience. The new show
would be broadcast nationally, every weekday, for an hour, in color;
it would be aimed at all children, from all socioeconomic backgrounds;
it would be explicitly educational, with eight specific learning
objectives drawn from a list devised by experts; and its format
would be that of a “magazine” made up of “one- to
fifteen-minute segments in different styles”—animation, puppetry,
games, stories. The “Early Childhood Television Program” would
also be an experiment: its outcome would be measured.

Cooney put together a board of academic advisers, chaired by the
developmental psychologist Gerald Lesser, and in 1968 she began a
series of seminars loosely affiliated with the Harvard School of
Education, where Lesser was a professor. To one of those seminars, she
later recalled, “this bearded, prophetic figure in sandals walks in
and sits way at the back, ram-rod straight, staring ahead with no
expression on his face.” She thought that he might be a member of
the Weather Underground. She whispered to a colleague, “How do we
know that man back there isn’t going to throw a bomb up here or toss
a hand grenade?”

“Not likely,” he said. “That’s Jim Henson.”

Henson—along with Kermit—had got his start on “Sam and
Friends,” a puppet-centric show broadcast on an NBC affiliate in
Washington, D.C., beginning in 1955. Other puppets on television
performed on puppet stages. Among the many features of Henson’s
lavish genius was his understanding that the television screen itself
was a perfect puppet stage. “_Sam and Friends_ was to the Muppets
what the Cavern Club was to the Beatles,” Michael Davis wrote in his
2008 book, “Street Gang: The Complete History of Sesame Street.”
The Muppets were witty and edgy, more Beat than square. Kermit
appeared on the “Tonight Show” in 1957. But, four years later,
“Sam and Friends” went off the air: Henson and his Muppets had
outgrown it. Henson turned to making documentaries and films and
commercials, as avant-garde as you could get with eyes made out of
Ping-Pong balls. In 1968, “The Itty-Bitty, Farm and City,
Witty-Ditty, Nitty-Gritty, Dog and Kitty, Pretty Little Kiddie Show”
was not what he had in mind for his next career move.

Cooney hired a lot of her talent from “Captain Kangaroo,”
including Jon Stone, who would produce and direct the new show. It was
Stone who had brought Henson to the seminars. “If we can’t get
Henson,” Stone’s team said, “then we just won’t have
puppets.” In negotiations, Henson drove a hard bargain. He wanted to
retain all rights to his Muppets and split any merchandising from the
characters, fifty-fifty, with the Children’s Television Workshop.
Henson signed on, and brought on a team that included Frank Oz, who
performed Bert, Cookie Monster, and Grover, and Caroll Spinney, who
had played a lion on Boston’s “Bozo’s Circus,” and now took on
the roles of Oscar the Grouch and Big Bird, a character modelled on an
easily flustered four-year-old who needs a lot of help. But Henson
brought more than Muppets to “Sesame Street”: he produced many of
the show’s “inserts,” the short films that work like
commercials. And it was Henson who put into the pitch reel the running
gag about the show’s having no title.

The bit was a sendup, but there had been a real battle about the title
over at the Children’s Television Workshop, where everyone had been
required to come up with a list of twenty names. None of them worked.
Stone suggested “123 Avenue B.” The main stage, after all, was
supposed to be a brownstone-lined city street, and, as Rowlf told
Kermit in the pitch reel, “The idea is to teach little preschool
kids some stuff that’ll be useful to them in school, like numbers
and letters, and like that.” (Kermit cocked his green head: “And
your idea is that the kids are gonna race in from baseball and turn on
the educational-TV channel to be taught letters and numbers, hmm?”)
But “123 Avenue B” got struck down: too New York.

In the smoke-filled boardroom at the end of a long day, the network
executives’ clothes have grown rumpled and the table is heaped with
crumpled pieces of paper.

Finally, one Muppet executive has an idea:

“Hey, these kids can’t read or write, can they?” he asks, with
the oily voice of a villain.

The other Muppets murmur their assent.

“Then howzabout we call the show ‘Hey, Stupid!’ ”

This was Henson’s swipe at the vapidity and condescension of earlier
children’s television shows, from “Ding Dong School” to “Howdy
Doody” and “The Mickey Mouse Club,” and at the kind of show that
do-gooding foundations had imagined targeting, exclusively, to
disadvantaged kids. (“What are they going to call it?” Cooney,
wanted to know. “ ‘The Poor Children’s Hour’?”)

“ ‘Hey, Stupid!’?” Rowlf yowls, incredulous. “O.K., that
does it! Out, you guys, out!”

The dog despairs—“Who’s gonna find us a title now?”—until
the frog croaks, “Hey, Rowlf, why don’t you call your show
‘Sesame Street’? . . . You know, like ‘Open Sesame’? It
kind of gives the idea of a street where neat stuff happens.”

“Kermit, why, you’re a genius!”

In fact, the idea hadn’t gone over that well at the Children’s
Television Workshop, since, as one wisecracker pointed out, a good
part of the show’s audience—kids losing their baby teeth—would
only be able to say, “Theth-a-me Threet.” That, it turned out, was
a price the Children’s Television Workshop was prepared to pay.

“Sesame Street” débuted on PBS stations across the country on
November 10, 1969, four months after Apollo 11 landed on the moon, and
about six months before the U.S. invaded Cambodia. “Brought to you
today by the letters ‘W,’ ‘S,’ and ‘E,’ and by the numbers
2 and 3,” the show was actually underwritten by grants from the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting (established by the Public
Broadcasting Act of 1967), the U.S. Department of Education, the Ford
Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation.

Both NBC and CBS had turned down the chance to broadcast the show.
But, a week before its launch, NBC, in an act of surprising
public-spiritedness, ran a half-hour preview, “This Way to Sesame
Street,” hosted by Ernie and Bert from their basement apartment.
“It’s gonna be on the air every day for a whole hour, and in some
places it’s going to be on twice a day, twice a day, Bert,” Ernie
says, holding up two fuzzy orange fingers.

The original “Sesame Street” has some of the campiness and Pop-art
punchiness of the “Batman” TV series, broadcast on ABC from 1966
to 1968. It’s got the pace and variety and kookiness of “Monty
Python’s Flying Circus,” which made its début only weeks before
“Sesame Street.” And through it all runs a deep vein of
earnestness, especially embodied in the human characters, assembled
from a cast led by Matt Robinson. He had been hired as a producer and
a coördinator of the show’s live-action films but was recruited to
play Gordon, a human character named for Gordon Parks. (Robinson’s
very young daughter, watching the first episode back home, cried and
said, “His name’s not Gordon, his name is Daddy.”)

Within weeks, “Sesame Street” was a cultural phenomenon. A
1970 _New Yorker_ cartoon: “Why isn’t that child at home
watching ‘Sesame Street’?” a street cop asks the mother of a
little girl feeding pigeons in the park. _TV Guide_ declared in 1971
that “_Sesame Street_ has enjoyed what may be the most astonishing
success of any show in the whole history of American television.”
The _Times_ critic Jack Gould predicted, “When the Educational
Testing Service of Princeton, New Jersey, completes its analysis in
the months to come, ‘Sesame Street’ may prove to be far more than
an unusual television program. On a large scale, the country’s
reward may be a social document of infinite value in education.”

To an astonishing degree, that turned out to be true. A recent study
by the National Bureau of Economic Research, following up on the
original E.T.S. assessment by looking at longer-term outcomes,
described “Sesame Street” as “the first _mooc_.” But that
description sells the show short; massive open online courses, like
other kinds of “remote teaching,” are mainly an educational
catastrophe. Children all over the world have been shut out of their
schools by the _covid_-19 crisis, and, one fears, are learning very
little on Google Hangouts and in Zoom classrooms. The story was
different with “Sesame Street.” For kids who were under six in
1969, watching “Sesame Street” had a measurable effect on what is
known as “grade for age” status: they entered school at grade
level, and, in elementary school, they stayed on grade level, an
effect that, the study concluded, “was particularly pronounced for
boys, black, non-Hispanic children, and those living in economically
disadvantaged areas.” And it cost only five dollars per kid per
year.

One of the best things about early “Sesame Street” was how well it
responded to its critics. When the show started, it had no Latino
characters. After a series of protests from the Puerto Rican and
Chicano communities, including a press release denouncing the
Children’s Television Workshop’s “racist attitude,” Cooney
brought in a Latin-American advisory committee and, in its third
season, added the characters of Maria (played by Sonia Manzano,
who’d just graduated from Carnegie Mellon) and Luis (Emilio Delgado,
an actor from L.A. and a longtime Chicano activist), who became the
heart of the cast for decades. A grant from the Department of
Education funded a Spanish-language version of the show, but “Sesame
Street” also decided to just make the program bilingual. In 1972,
after a letter-writing campaign by the National Organization for
Women, following an Op-Ed in the _Times_ that described “Sesame
Street” as “a world virtually without female people,” new
people, and new Muppets, moved onto the street. And when initial
testing revealed that the show’s reach into the urban neighborhoods
it most wanted to reach was limited, the cast was sent on a national
tour to build interest in targeted cities. The outreach worked.

Early “Sesame Street” came in for criticism from the right, too.
In May of 1970, just after the fatal police shootings at Jackson State
College, Mississippi’s State Commission for Educational Television
voted to ban the show, objecting to its integrated cast. A character
introduced by Robinson, the actor who played Gordon, also led to
controversy. Robinson had come out of the Black Arts Movement and was
among those who complained to Cooney that Sesame Street was “more
Westchester than Watts.” None of the Muppets read as black, so
Robinson and Henson created a purple Muppet kid named Roosevelt
Franklin. Franklin was such a prodigy that he ran his own elementary
school. But he also talked in black English. This led to such a bitter
fight between black anti-Roosevelt and pro-Roosevelt factions that
Robinson left the show after the third season. But not before
Roosevelt Franklin made an album of spoken poetry. “Take a listen to
me talking,” he says. “I like the way I talk. Yes, I do.”

Despite the show’s rocky start, those early episodes are still the
best television ever made for young children. The magnificence of its
achievement was summed up
[[link removed]] by
this magazine’s film critic Renata Adler, in 1972: “It is as
though all the lessons of New Deal federal planning and all the
sixties experience of the ‘local people,’ the techniques of the
totalitarian slogan and the American commercial, the devices of film
and the cult of the famous, the research of educators and the talent
of artists had combined in one small television experiment to sell, by
means of television, the rational, the humane, and the linear to
little children.” It doesn’t get any better than that.

Emily Kingsley had worked odd jobs in television production until, in
1970, she was hired by “Sesame Street” as a writer. She went on to
win twenty-three Emmys. In 1974, she gave birth to a boy, Jason, with
Down syndrome. He started showing up as a guest when he was a toddler,
and eventually appeared in fifty-five episodes. He helped Ernie spell
words that end with “at.” He counted in English; he counted in
Spanish. Watching Jason reading the word “love” with Cookie
Monster, letter by letter, is as sacred as some sacraments. “Sesame
Street” broke a public silence on Down syndrome twelve years before
ABC began broadcasting “Life Goes On,” the first television show
to feature a character (and actor) with Down syndrome. “I went for
broke,” Kingsley later recalled. “I said, ‘If we can put on
Jason, why can’t we put on a whole lot of other kids with
disabilities?’ ” Following Kingsley’s initiative, “Sesame
Street” characters and Muppets and guests have included deaf kids
(the show also teaches sign language) and kids in wheelchairs. Tarah
Schaeffer, who has osteogenesis imperfecta, joined the cast in 1993,
when she was nine. A lot of viewers still remember when she sang
“The Wheels on My Wheelchair” to the tune of “The Wheels on the
Bus,” on her way down the sidewalk to join a basketball game. In a
more recent milestone, Julia, a yellow Muppet with autism, joined the
show, in 2017. She and Big Bird got to be good friends. (Julia,
though, later became the subject of contention. Last year, an
autism-advocacy group that had helped develop the character cut ties
with “Sesame Street.”)

“Sesame Street” sparked a revolution in children’s television,
David Kamp argues, but those changes didn’t last. “Mister
Rogers’ Neighborhood” stopped making new episodes in 1975. “The
Electric Company,” another production of the Children’s Television
Workshop, shut down in 1977. Meanwhile, at “Sesame Street,” Henson
felt trapped. “I am living my own worst nightmare,” he told
Cooney, before leaving to launch “The Muppet Show,” in 1976. For
Kamp, “Sesame Street” peaked in 1983, after the death of Will Lee,
the actor who played Mr. Hooper, the neighborhood grocer. Lee, a
former member of a radical theatre troupe, had been called before the
House Un-American Activities Committee in the nineteen-fifties and
been blacklisted from television; “Sesame Street” had become his
theatrical home. He was much admired by the rest of the cast, and the
writers decided to reckon, on air, with grief. Big Bird, told that Mr.
Hooper is dead, wants to know when he’s coming back. “Big Bird,
when people die they don’t come back,” a cast member says, softly.
Big Bird tilts his head, yellow feathers fluttering, and whispers,
unbelieving, “Ever?”

That episode was a high point. The Reagan years marked the beginning
of the fall. The federal government all but stopped funding
educational television in 1981, and deregulation meant that the F.C.C.
accepted “The Flintstones” as fulfilling a station’s
“educational” requirement. Kids’ TV in the nineteen-eighties
involved mainly plastic toys: “My Little Pony ’n Friends,”
“Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.” “Sesame Street” became more
commercial. Stone complained, from retirement, that a new, gentrified
set redesign in 1993 made it look “more like the South Street
Seaport than 127th Street.” “Barney and Friends” came out in
1992, not many years after a Barney-like Elmo came to Sesame Street, a
place that had gotten, as Sonia Manzano put it, a whole lot “more
cutie-pie.” As Kamp observes, “Sesame Street” has become
“essentially an expanded, extravagantly art-directed Elmo’s
World.”

It’s not that the show isn’t still ambitious. It’s that it’s
become hostage to its own ambition. “_Sesame Street_ is the most
extensively researched television program in history,” according to
“The Sesame Effect,” a 2016 collection of essays by a team of
researchers from the Sesame Workshop (the successor to the
Children’s Television Workshop). That’s why “Sesame Street”
tends to follow ed-school fads. A _stem_ curricular initiative
became, right on schedule, a _steam_ initiative (with an “A” for
“arts”). Story lines, contorted to fit these fads, have grown more
and more contrived. In one episode, the cast had to figure out how to
use a pulley to lift Mr. Snuffleupagus into the air as part of the
Dance of the Six Swans. Then there was the infamous cookie kerfuffle,
in which, in response to the childhood-obesity epidemic, the show’s
producers decided to give Cookie Monster an epiphany: “Cookies are a
sometimes food.” Right-wing conspiracy theorists claimed that
liberal, egghead vegetarians had renamed him Veggie Monster. Cookie
Monster went on the “Today Show” and “The Colbert Report” to
mock his critics. But there was actually something weirder behind the
recasting of Cookie Monster, which had to do with an interest in
addressing A.D.H.D. As reported in “The Sesame Effect,” “Cookie
Monster was selected to learn self-control and model self-regulation
strategies to build executive function skills.” Really? Cookie
Monster?

Some of the show’s more recent diversity-and-inclusion efforts have
been controversial, and its definition of diversity and inclusion has
its own limits (rural poverty and religion have little place on the
American “Sesame Street,” for instance). In 2011, Sesame Workshop
introduced a Muppet named Lily, whose family struggled with hunger
and, later, homelessness; in 2013, Alex, whose father is in prison; in
2019, Karli, a child who has been placed in foster care because her
mother suffers from addiction. In the sixties, the creators of the
original “Sesame Street” had a heated debate about whether to
confront the grimmer realities of the lives of some of their
viewers—drug use, gun violence, police brutality, domestic
abuse—and decided against it. They chose, instead, to make the
street look real, a little grimy, a little raggedy, but with problems
like when Ernie eats cookies in bed, and Bert tells him he’ll make a
mess, so Ernie decides to eat his cookies in Bert’s bed. This
“Sesame Street” is not in the same neighborhood as that one.

“Sesame Street” is now seen in more than a hundred and seventy
countries, mainly through co-productions, aided by the Sesame Workshop
but run in-country by what the Workshop refers to as “indigenous”
production teams of educators, artists, musicians, writers, and
puppeteers. “Our producers are like old-fashioned missionaries,”
Cooney said in a 2006 documentary, “The World According to Sesame
Street.” “It’s not religion they’re spreading, but it’s
learning, and tolerance.” If this has led to charges of cultural
imperialism—many co-productions, including “Sisimpur,” in
Bangladesh, were funded, in part, by U.S.A.I.D.—those charges are
generally belied by the actual productions. “Internationalism
doesn’t mean you must copy the rich country,” the Bangladeshi
puppeteer Mustafa Monwar has said, of a Dhaka-based production for
which local set designers built a rural street set under a banyan tree
by a tea shop. “Sisimpur” follows the “ ‘Sesame’ model”:
educators meet with a creative team to develop the curriculum, whose
effectiveness is subsequently assessed through testing. But the
circumstances are fundamentally different from those in the United
States in 1968: seventy per cent of Bangladesh’s population is
rural, and fewer than half can watch television. “Sisimpur” sends
out televisions on rickshaws, for kids in villages to watch.

“This is corrupt to the point of perversion,” Patrick Buchanan
ranted on cable television in 2002, when “Takalani Sesame,” a
South African co-production, introduced Kami, a furry yellow Muppet
who is H.I.V.-positive. Developed at the insistence of South African
television for a preschool curriculum about the disease, Kami was
hugely successful in educating kids, and their families, about
H.I.V.-_aids_. “Kami, we are not scared to play with you, because we
know that we cannot catch H.I.V. just by being your friend,” another
Muppet says to her. In 2016, Afghanistan’s “Baghch-e-Simsim,”
now in its seventh season, introduced a purple Muppet named Zari, a
six-year-old Muslim girl. (Americans have petitioned for a Muslim
character to be added to the American show.) This winter, the Sesame
Workshop, in tandem with the International Rescue Committee, launched
one of the largest early-childhood interventions in the history of
humanitarianism: “Ahlan Simsim,” an Arabic-language show designed
to help millions of children who are refugees.

Abroad, “Sesame Street” is still driven by the spirit of 1968. In
the U.S., that spark has gone. The Muppets were sold to Disney, after
which the Disney Channel launched a sickening remake of the Henson
series “Muppet Babies,” a show so merchandise-driven that wittle,
itty-bitty, never-witty Baby Kermit might as well talk with a price
tag hanging off his face. Since 2015, “Sesame Street” has been
released first not on PBS but on HBO. A show designed as a public
service, part of the War on Poverty, is now one you’ve got to pay
for. In a staggering betrayal of the spirit of the show’s founding
philosophy, last year’s fiftieth-anniversary special appeared on HBO
before it was broadcast on PBS. This month, HBO Max is launching
“The Not-Too-Late Show with Elmo.” A few years back, if you bought
DVDs of any of the first five seasons of “Sesame Street” they came
with a disclaimer: “These early ‘Sesame Street’ episodes are
intended for grown-ups and may not suit the needs of today’s
preschool child.” Or these anthology editions could just have been
given a different title: “Hey, Stupid!”

“Stay home!” Oscar the Grouch says in a recent _covid_-19
public-service announcement. “I don’t want to see your smiling
face!” It’s not funny. It’s not sweet. It isn’t even
delightfully grouchy. It’s just shtick. Honestly, it’s enough to
send you to bed with a box of cookies. “I was just hungry, Bert. So
I thought I’d have a few cookies before I go to sleep.” Good
night, Ernie. ♦

An earlier version of this article misstated the title of a
documentary project by Joan Ganz Cooney, as well as certain details
about the Muppets Julia, Elmo, and Lily and the shows “Sisimpur,”
“Ahlan Simsim,” and Disney’s “Muppet Babies”; and wrongly
dated “Sesame Street” ’s début in relation to the U.S. invasion
of Cambodia, and the broadcast schedule of the fiftieth-anniversary
special.

Published in the print edition of the May 11, 2020
[[link removed]], issue, with the
headline “When Ernie Met Bert.”

_Jill Lepore [[link removed]] is
a professor of history at Harvard and the host of the podcast “The
Last Archive.” Her fourteenth book, “If Then
[[link removed]],”
will be published in September._

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis