From Michigan Department of Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject Federal Court Dismisses Meritless RNC Lawsuit Targeting Michigan Voter Registry
Date October 22, 2024 10:08 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Nessel Email Header [ [link removed] ]




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:*

October 22, 2024




*Media Contact:
*Danny Wimmer <[email protected]>






Federal Court Dismisses Meritless RNC Lawsuit Targeting Michigan Voter Registry





*LANSING* – Today, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Judge Jane Beckering granted Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee (RNC) challenging Michigan’s voter registration database and maintenance.  The RNC sued Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Director of Elections Jonathan Brater under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), citing high registration numbers in the State, and today Judge Beckering dismissed the lawsuit for lack of standing while also noting in her opinion that the RNC’s claims lacked merit.

“The Court’s ruling is yet another example of the Republican National Committee’s strategy to present baseless, frivolous arguments both inside courtrooms as well as on social media,” said Nessel.  “Michigan should be applauded as a leader in voter registration and maintenance of its voter rolls, not the target of meritless political lawsuits that serve no purpose but to incite uncertainty in our Democratic processes.  That a major national political party is engaging in lawsuits that serve no purpose other than to undermine the public’s faith in our system of elections is shameful.”

In her opinion and order, Judge Beckering found fault in the RNC’s registered voter calculations, leading them to “inaccurately conclude” that the qualified voter file  contained too many registrants, and further that even if their faulty census data were reliable, it “does not plausibly indicate” any violation of the law, and that the RNC’s requested relief of requiring state officials ensure that ineligible voters are removed “in telling fashion, flips the statutory mandate on its head,” because the statute requires Michigan to ensure that any eligible applicants are registered, while making a “reasonable effort” to remove ineligible voters from the voter rolls.

Judge Beckering continued in her opinion and order: “...the NVRA purposes to both protect electoral integrity and protect against unlawful voter disenfranchisement.  Absent Plaintiff’s legal conclusions and unwarranted factual inferences, which this Court is not required to accept as true... there is no content in Plaintiff’s Complaint that states a plausible claim under the NVRA.”

 

"###"

 






AG logo [ [link removed] ]





*Media Inquiries* <[email protected]>




*Latest Releases* [ [link removed] ]




*File a Complaint* [ [link removed] ]







________________________________________________________________________

Michigan Department of the Attorney General [ [link removed] ]   Questions?
  Contact Us [ [link removed] ]

STAY CONNECTED: Visit us on Twitter [ [link removed] ] Instagram logo [ [link removed] ] Visit us on Facebook [ [link removed] ] YouTube [ [link removed] ] Sign up for email updates [ [link removed] ]      

Bookmark and Share [ [link removed] ]

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES:
Manage Preferences [ [link removed] ]  | Help [ [link removed] ]

________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Michigan Attorney General · G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor · 525 W. Ottawa St., P.O. Box 30212 · Lansing, MI 48909 · 517-373-1100
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis