May 8, 2020
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
This is what it looks like when you shoot the economy in the head
25.4 million Americans have
lost their jobs since February through mid-April, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics reports — 17.3 million who are unemployed, and another 8.1 million
who have left the labor force completely — in response to the Chinese
coronavirus pandemic as Americans sit home and wait it out. Although the Bureau
tabulates a reported unemployment rate of 14.7 percent, if you count the 8.1
million who left the labor force, too, plus the 5.8 million who were already unemployed,
and the number looks more like 18.9 percent. Either way, that is the highest
reported unemployment rate since the Great Depression, and still moving north.
As the monthly report was taken in mid-April, it does not take into account all
of the initial jobless claims that have taken place since April 11, which total
more than 11.4 million. With so many millions of Americans losing their jobs
every week, the data will continue to have a lot of noise as the two sets of
numbers bleed into one another until they stop rising, and labor markets
finally hit their bottom. Then the totality of the job losses will be known.
Suffice to say, wherever the true numbers are, they are bad enough.
Video: ALG President Rick Manning applauds justice in Flynn case, calls for more justice
Justice Department to federal
court: "The United States of America hereby moves to dismiss with
prejudice the criminal information filed against Michael T. Flynn pursuant to
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a)." Hear from Americans for Limited
Government President Rick Manning on why this is an important quote in our
nation.
Byron York: What did Joe Biden know about Michael Flynn and when did he know it?
“What did Joe Biden know about
Michael Flynn? … Sally Yates was Barack Obama's Deputy Attorney General, and as
such she played a key role in the Flynn investigation. She told special counsel
Robert Mueller's prosecutors in September 2017 that she did not know about the
transition phone call between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak until
she was told about it by...President Barack Obama.It happened on January 5,
2017. Yates was in a group that went to the Oval Office to brief Obama on the
findings of the Intelligence Community investigation into Russian campaign
meddling. The meeting had all the administration's top national security
officials: FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, National
Intelligence chief James Clapper, national security adviser Susan Rice, and
other National Security Council officials. ‘After the briefing, Obama dismissed
the group but asked Yates and Comey to stay behind,’a memo of Yates' interview
read. ‘Obama started by saying he had 'learned of the information about Flynn'
and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions.’ Yates was totally
blindsided. ‘At that point, Yates had no idea what the president was talking
about,’ the interview write-up said. What does that have to do with Biden? The
interview notes made no mention of the vice president. But think back to one of
the stranger moments in the Trump-Russia investigation: Rice, on January 20,
2017, at almost the exact minute the Obama administration left office, sent an
email to herself documenting the January 5 meeting. This is how it began: ‘On
January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the
2016 presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation
with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval
Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.’”
This is what it looks like when you shoot the economy in the head
By Robert Romano
25.4 million Americans have lost their jobs since February through mid-April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports — 17.3 million who are unemployed, and another 8.1 million who have left the labor force completely — in response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic as Americans sit home and wait it out.
Although the Bureau tabulates a reported unemployment rate of 14.7 percent, if you count the 8.1 million who left the labor force, too, plus the 5.8 million who were already unemployed, and the number looks more like 18.9 percent.
Either way, that is the highest reported unemployment rate since the Great Depression, and still moving north. As the monthly report was taken in mid-April, it does not take into account all of the initial jobless claims that have taken place since April 11, which total more than 11.4 million.
With so many millions of Americans losing their jobs every week, the data will continue to have a lot of noise as the two sets of numbers bleed into one another until they stop rising, and labor markets finally hit their bottom. Then the totality of the job losses will be known.
Suffice to say, wherever the true numbers are, they are bad enough.
By Robert Romano
25.4 million Americans have lost their jobs since February through mid-April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports — 17.3 million who are unemployed, and another 8.1 million who have left the labor force completely — in response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic as Americans sit home and wait it out.
Although the Bureau tabulates a reported unemployment rate of 14.7 percent, if you count the 8.1 million who left the labor force, too, plus the 5.8 million who were already unemployed, and the number looks more like 18.9 percent.
Either way, that is the highest reported unemployment rate since the Great Depression, and still moving north. As the monthly report was taken in mid-April, it does not take into account all of the initial jobless claims that have taken place since April 11, which total more than 11.4 million.
With so many millions of Americans losing their jobs every week, the data will continue to have a lot of noise as the two sets of numbers bleed into one another until they stop rising, and labor markets finally hit their bottom. Then the totality of the job losses will be known.
Suffice to say, wherever the true numbers are, they are bad enough. And they would probably be much higher if not for $730 billion plus that was given to small businesses via the payroll protection plan that was enacted by Congress.
But we are seeing real devastation with these state government directed closures, and it’s anyone’s guess how long it will be before we hit the bottom and then how long before we ever recover from the equivalent of an asteroid striking the global economy.
Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning was emphatic in his statement this morning that now it is time to reopen America: “Almost 8.1 million people have left the workforce since February, another 17.3 million people have become unemployed in the same time period, totaling 25.4 million who had jobs but no longer do. This is what it looks like when you shoot your economy in the head over a public health issue, and this is why reopening America is job one for our political leaders.”
Manning added, concluding, “Additional bailouts for states, local governments, business and others do not replace the jobs that a free market economy creates. Further delays in reopening state and local economies will only make the economic disaster worse. And more intractable. America can no longer allow this China originated virus to destroy our economic and societal future. It's time to get back to work and stop pretending that massive government bailouts can solve the problem.”
That’s right. For as much money as Congress and the Federal Reserve throw at the problem, it will not solve it. For our modern society to function, we need a modern economy and that requires people to work. To all those who still harbor illusions what a Green New Deal or universal income schemes would do to the economy, this is what it would do. It would destroy our economy and remove incentives to work and prosper, and in the process we will no longer be a prosperous society.
We need to reopen the economy, while there still is an economy.
Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government.
Video: ALG President Rick Manning applauds justice in Flynn case, calls for more justice
To view online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwyRiTDTBeQ
ALG Editor’s Note: In the following featured column from the Washington Examiner, Byron York asks what former Vice President Joe Biden knew about Michael Flynn, and when did he know it?:
What did Joe Biden know about Michael Flynn and when did he know it?
By Byron York
WHAT DID JOE BIDEN KNOW ABOUT MICHAEL FLYNN? It takes a little digging, but there's a Joe Biden connection deep inside the documents released as part of the Justice Department's decision to drop charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn. It is this: Sally Yates was Barack Obama's Deputy Attorney General, and as such she played a key role in the Flynn investigation. She told special counsel Robert Mueller's prosecutors in September 2017 that she did not know about the transition phone call between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak until she was told about it by...President Barack Obama.
It happened on January 5, 2017. Yates was in a group that went to the Oval Office to brief Obama on the findings of the Intelligence Community investigation into Russian campaign meddling. The meeting had all the administration's top national security officials: FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, National Intelligence chief James Clapper, national security adviser Susan Rice, and other National Security Council officials. "After the briefing, Obama dismissed the group but asked Yates and Comey to stay behind," a memo of Yates' interview read. "Obama started by saying he had 'learned of the information about Flynn' and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions." Yates was totally blindsided. "At that point, Yates had no idea what the president was talking about," the interview write-up said.
What does that have to do with Biden? The interview notes made no mention of the vice president. But think back to one of the stranger moments in the Trump-Russia investigation: Rice, on January 20, 2017, at almost the exact minute the Obama administration left office, sent an email to herself documenting the January 5 meeting. This is how it began: "On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present."
Oh -- so Biden was there, too. The Rice memo-to-self always appeared to be an oddly-timed effort to cover for Obama. "President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities 'by the book,' Rice wrote. "The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book." Got that? By the book.
There was a bit of a protest-too-much quality to it all. And indeed, a lot of Republicans, as they tried to figure out what steps the intelligence and law enforcement agencies took against incoming President Trump, have always wondered just what Obama knew about it. But now, it just so happens that another person who was in the room -- the Oval Office -- is running for president. So it seems reasonable to ask what Joe Biden knew about the intelligence and law enforcement efforts against the Trump team.
The people who would most like to know the answer: the Trump campaign. "Joe Biden was in the room when one of the greatest abuses of power by an administration in American history was in progress," Trump campaign spokesman Matt Wolking said after the news broke. "The corrupt media will do its best to cover up this scandal and protect him, but Americans deserve to know: What did Joe Biden know and when did he know it?"
To view online: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-what-did-joe-biden-know-about-michael-flynn