WG Discussion Points: A Civil Debate?
Now That's An October Surprise
WG Discussion Points | David Winston
October 3, 2024
For this week's edition of Discussion Points, we are sending David's latest Roll Call column A Civil Debate? Now That's An October Surprise.
A civil debate? Now that's an October Surprise
Policy differences were the star of the Vance-Walz faceoff
Something weird happened in last night's high-stakes vice presidential debate. The country expected another unpleasant rhetorical rumble, but instead saw two political candidates engage in a civil discourse focused, for the most part, on policy.
In the weeks leading up to the VP debate, media stories anticipated the kind of personal attacks that characterized the earlier debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. It would likely be, the pundits thought, one gotcha moment after another, a rehash of every statement that could possibly be used to damage their opponent and make the electorate more unfavorable toward them. In other words, it would be one more "it's not about me' it's about thee" debate that voters have come to expect from political candidates today.
While there were certainly serious policy disagreements between JD Vance and Tim Walz, there were also moments of agreement, which both candidates verbally acknowledged. In the end, the debate seems to have resulted in an extremely unusual outcome. Both candidates walked off the stage last night having upped their popularity with the electorate.