Native people are incarcerated at a rate 2 to 4 times higher than white people.

Prison Policy Initiative updates for October 8, 2024 Exposing how mass incarceration harms communities and our national welfare

New, expanded data on Indian country jails show concerning trends extend to tribal lands [[link removed]] In Indian country jails, populations have rebounded from pandemic lows, the detention of women and older adults is increasing, and new offense type data raise questions about why so many people are incarcerated on tribal lands. [[link removed]]

by Emily Widra

Native people are consistently overrepresented in the criminal legal system, accounting for only 1% of the total U.S. population but 3% of the incarcerated population [[link removed]]. More specifically, the national incarceration rate of Native people is between two and four times [[link removed]] higher than that of white people. Now, newly released data on jails in Indian country [[link removed]] in 2023 provide more detail on this disturbing disparity: the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reports that, much like other jails across the country, Indian country jail populations are quickly bouncing back from the lows of the COVID-19 pandemic, and this growth has disproportionately impacted women and older adults.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) collects and publishes data about jail facilities on Native land separately — and with differing kinds of details — from other locally-operated jails across the country. In this iteration of the BJS survey on Indian country jails, the bureau collected new, more detailed information about offense types that are crucial to understanding the role of jails on Native land. They also reveal the troubling overuse of jails in response to non-criminal behaviors for youth and adults.

Jail populations in Indian country — like in jails across the country — were generally trending upward before a sharp decrease during 2020, which was the result of fewer arrests and slowed court processes during the pandemic; they have quickly resumed their upward trajectories in the years since.

Indian country jail populations continue to rise after COVID-19

Jail populations across the country — including local and Indian country jails — dropped dramatically during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (30% from 2019 to 2020). This temporary decline [[link removed]] was primarily explained by fewer people being arrested and booked into jails, as well as slowed court processes. In 2020, Indian country jails saw their first decline [[link removed]] in total jail populations since 2013 [[link removed]]. But jail populations on Native land and across the country quickly surged after the first year of the pandemic: from 2020 to 2023, the Indian country jail population grew by 19%, consistent with the 21% growth seen in local jail populations nationwide [[link removed]] over the same time period. However, from 2022 to 2023, other local jail populations only ticked up by 0.2% [[link removed]], while the Indian country jail population rose by 7% over that single-year period. In other words, while rebounds in local jail populations are slowing, Indian country jail populations are rising more dramatically.

Women and older adults increasingly incarcerated in Indian country jails

Much like other parts of the criminal legal system [[link removed]], the growth of the women’s and older adult populations in Indian country jails has outpaced the growth among men and younger adults.

Women: Native women are disproportionately affected by almost every part of the criminal legal system. They are incarcerated at higher rates than women of any other racial or ethnic group [[link removed]]. Additionally, women account for a larger portion of the Indian country jail population than they do in other local jails across the nation: in 2023, women represented over a quarter (26%) of adults incarcerated in Indian country jails, but only 14% of people incarcerated in other local jails [[link removed]]. In the last three years, the number of adult women in Indian country jails has grown 37%, compared to only 15% for men. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, however, we saw this dynamic in reverse: from 2016-2019, the number of women in Indian country jails only rose by 5%, while the number of men rose by 19%. This suggests an alarming shift in the incarceration trends of women in Indian country since the pandemic began, in line with the escalating incarceration rates of women [[link removed]] throughout the nation.

Older adults: There are limited historical data on the age of people incarcerated in Indian country jails: the Bureau of Justice Statistics only began collecting and publishing this information in 2021. But over this three-year period, the rise in the number of older adults incarcerated in Indian country jails has been consistent with national trends [[link removed]]: between 2021 and 2023, the number of people 55 and older in Indian country jails grew by 38%, while the number of adults under 55 years old only grew by 9%. To be sure, these populations are fairly small in scale — the overall population increase from 2021 to 2023 was 220 people — but any upward trend in the incarceration of older people is worth examining.

Jailing increasing numbers of older adults is part of a terrible national trend of policing [[link removed]] unhoused people, poor people, people who use drugs and alcohol, and people with cognitive disabilities. Housing instability [[link removed]], chronic diseases [[link removed]], poverty [[link removed]], and substance use [[link removed]] all disproportionately impact Native people, and older Native adults are particularly vulnerable to arrest, detention, and the serious and harmful consequences of incarceration.

New offense data reveals troubling trends on the overuse of jails in Indian country

This iteration of the Jails in Indian Country series provides more data than previous years, including more specific categorizations of the offenses for which people have been detained. These additional details are welcome, especially in light of the limited offense data among jail populations in general. In previous years, large portions of the Indian country jail population were lumped together in an “other unspecified” offense category. In 2022, for example, 29% [[link removed]] of offenses reported to the BJS were “other unspecified,” [[link removed]] and this catchall category has been as high as 37% of offenses in 2015. The inclusion of additional offense categories in the most recent survey significantly reduced “other unspecified” offenses to only 8% of the total. Additionally, this is the first iteration of the survey to include mental health and civil commitment holds, unspecified warrants, and status offenses for youth. These additions clarify what’s driving population growth in Indian country jails, while illuminating troubling trends about the overuse of these jails at the same time:

Holds: The addition of the mental health and civil commitment holds in Indian country jails offers new insight into how often jails are used for questionable reasons. As we’ve argued before, detainers and “holds” contribute to unnecessary jailing [[link removed]], often keeping people in detention longer than necessary while awaiting psychiatric treatment or substance use treatment. Given the heightened prevalence of substance use disorders among Native people, the fact that people are in jail for mental health and civil commitment holds instead of receiving crucial healthcare [[link removed]] reflects a serious dearth of treatment access on Native land [[link removed]]. Unspecified warrants: About 20% of people in Indian country jails are detained for warrants without a specified offense. Many of these detentions are likely for bench warrants related to a “failure to appear” in court given the lack of specific offense data. We know that many court responses to “failure to appear” — including jailing — do not actually promote public safety [[link removed]] and are often a misuse of resources. That’s because most people who “fail to appear” are not actually evading justice or threatening public safety: nationally, 87% [[link removed]] of people who miss criminal court dates are facing “nonviolent” charges [[link removed]] for property, drug, and public order offenses. Considering around a quarter of all cases are eventually dismissed, many people who miss court face punishment even though they would likely not be convicted of the alleged crime that brought them into contact with the system in the first place. Youth status offenses: More than 1 in 10 youth in Indian country jails are held for a status offense, or a “noncriminal act that is considered a law violation only because of a youth’s status as a minor.” This can include missing school, underage drinking, violating curfew, or running away [[link removed]]. Native youth are disproportionately represented in status offenses across the country: in 2021, Native youth accounted for 4% of all status offense cases in juvenile court [[link removed]], while only 1.3% [[link removed]] of the total U.S. population is Native. Status offenses carry serious consequences beyond jail detention: in 2021, 1,400 youth with status offenses were ordered to out-of-home placements [[link removed]] including youth prisons, residential treatment, or group homes, separating them from family and community support systems. “Crimes against vulnerable populations:” In this iteration of the survey, a sample of jails in Indian country were asked to report if they had any admissions (but not the actual number of admissions) for “crimes against vulnerable populations,” including human trafficking, kidnapping, or elder abuse over the course of a single month (June 2023). The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) characterizes [[link removed]] these additional questions as responsive to the “interest expressed by Congress, tribal leaders, and federal agencies” to illuminate “the types of persons being held.” At least 17% of all Indian country jails report admitting at least one person for elder abuse and at least 6% of Indian country jails reported admitting someone for kidnapping, while no facilities reported admissions for human trafficking in that month. We hope to see further innovations in future iterations and in the larger national BJS surveys as well. For now, it’s hard to put these findings in any kind of context as there is little data on the prevalence of these types of victimization, nor any detail about the people held on these charges in Indian country facilities.

Conclusion

The inclusion of new, more detailed data on jails in Indian country offers the public important insights into the incarceration of Native people on tribal lands. While these trends mirror what’s happening in jails elsewhere across the country, having this level of detail is nonetheless crucial to understanding how the criminal legal system impacts Native people and communities. More transparency must be provided in the coming years to better inform and target advocacy that reduces Native incarceration and confronts glaring racial disparities [[link removed]] in the criminal legal system. This is especially true considering much of this data has only become available in recent years, unfortunately limiting the historical record of Native incarceration. Ultimately, we hope the Bureau of Justice Statistics will continue and expand the collection and dissemination of such detailed information — including detailed offense and demographic data — for people in Indian country jails and jails across the nation.

***

For more information, including detailed footnotes, see the full version of this briefing on our website [[link removed]]. And for more information about the incarceration of Native people, visit our Native incarceration profile page [[link removed]].

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Other news: Mass incarceration is on the ballot

Election Day is right around the corner. While presidential campaigns get most of the attention from the news media, many lesser-known down-ballot races can have a much more dramatic impact on criminal legal system reform in America.

To assist voters, we put together a guide explaining how 19 of the most common elected offices they'll be asked to vote for [[link removed]] can help turn the page on mass incarceration in America.

Pushing back on candidates' claims about crime & mass incarceration [[link removed]]

During this campaign season, candidates are making a lot of claims about crime, incarceration, drugs, and homelessness — many of them are flat-out wrong.

In this new blog post [[link removed]], we've packaged up the facts you need to push back and advocate for community safety, not cages.

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Our other newsletters Ending prison gerrymandering ( archives [[link removed]]) Criminal justice research library ( archives [[link removed]])

Update your newsletter subscriptions [link removed].

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website [[link removed]] or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative [[link removed]]

PO Box 127

Northampton, Mass. 01061

Web Version [link removed] Unsubscribe [link removed] Update address / join other newsletters [link removed] Donate [[link removed]] Tweet this newsletter [link removed] Forward this newsletter [link removed]

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative

PO Box 127 Northampton, Mass. 01061

Did someone forward this to you? If you enjoyed reading, please subscribe! [[link removed]] Web Version [link removed] | Update address [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed] | Share via: Twitter [link removed] Facebook [[link removed] Email [link removed]