The States
New York Focus: Adams Scandal Exposes Potential Flaws in NYC’s Campaign Finance System
By Julia Rock and Mark Chiusano
.....This summer, city council member Lincoln Restler proposed a package of three bills aimed at bolstering the board’s oversight powers.
One bill would empower the board to stop matching funds for campaigns that fail to respond to board requests for information within 30 days – as the Adams campaign did in 2021, according to reporting from Gothamist.
“If this legislation had been in place for the 2021 cycle, it would have, in all likelihood, prevented the straw donor scheme that Mayor Adams and his campaign effectuated,” Restler told New York Focus.
“And if they tried to perpetuate this fraud anyway, the CFB would have not given them $10 million in matching funds,” he said, because the board could have withheld the money after Adams’ campaign failed to provide requested information about donors.
“He would have had no choice but to play by the rules,” said Restler, who is now calling on the board to halt public matching funds for the Adams campaign.
Restler’s bills would also impose more regulations on “intermediaries” – people who solicit donations for campaigns, such as by hosting fundraisers.
His legislation would require the board to make an effort to verify donations made through intermediaries by contacting the contributors. And it would limit people who work for city contractors from soliciting, or “bundling,” donations.
The board is currently in the public comment period for new rules, which include firmer language about denying candidates public funds if they fail to file certain disclosures or to respond to the board’s requests for information. A Brennan Center explainer published Thursday called the updates an “important step forward.”
|