Newsletter: Affirming the Public's Right to Records in Arizona
[link removed]

After fighting in court for the release of public records, American Oversight this week settled its lawsuit against officials in Cochise County, Ariz. ([link removed]) — including the two county supervisors who’d delayed the certification of the 2022 election.

We sued for records regarding the county’s election administration decisions, particularly surrounding Supervisors Tom Crosby and Peggy Judd’s certification delay as they pushed for a hand count of ballots.
* Our litigation forced the county to turn over thousands of pages of public records, including hundreds of communications that had been deleted by the county recorder but were recovered by a forensic specialist as part of the lawsuit.
* The settlement marks the conclusion of months-long litigation ([link removed]) and ensures that critical information is now in the hands of the public.


“Today’s win is a significant victory for transparency and accountability in Cochise County and will serve as a powerful deterrent against future election interference,” said Chioma Chukwu, American Oversight’s interim executive director.
* “Our message to election deniers and subverters is clear: We’re watching. The people’s right to expose public officials’ wrongdoing isn’t negotiable, and we stand ready to defend it in service of accountability,” Chukwu added.


Crosby and Judd gained national attention in 2022 after refusing ([link removed]) to certify Cochise County’s results by the state deadline, falsely claiming ([link removed]) the tabulators were uncertified.
* Over the course of litigation, a deposition revealed that County Recorder David Stevens had deleted relevant records, leading to a forensic search. We also uncovered evidence ([link removed]) that Crosby had used his personal cell phone and email account for official business.
* Records we obtained include communications that revealed details ([link removed]) about Crosby’s and Judd’s push for a hand count and support for the effort from conservative state lawmakers.


New Lawsuit Seeks Reports from August Arlington National Cemetery Incident
We’re suing ([link removed]) the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army for the expedited release of reports regarding an incident reportedly involving members of former President Donald Trump’s campaign and staff at Arlington National Cemetery.

According to news reports ([link removed]) , the Aug. 26 incident occurred when, during a visit by Trump to participate in a wreath-laying ceremony, cemetery staff attempted to prevent members of his campaign from filming and taking pictures while visiting a section where recent U.S. casualties are buried — something prohibited by federal law ([link removed]) to guard against gravesites being used for partisan political purposes.
* Before the visit, cemetery staff reportedly imposed certain conditions on the visits to the individual gravesites: The former president could not bring campaign staff with him, and no photography was permitted.
* While in office, Trump repeatedly sought ([link removed]) to politicize the military ([link removed]) , and his administration frequently violated the Hatch Act ([link removed]) , the federal law prohibiting government officials from using their positions to advance partisan political activity.


The Trump campaign has disputed ([link removed]) media accounts of the incident, and the former president has even suggested that the incident did not happen at all. Arlington National Cemetery has confirmed that there was an incident and that a report was filed.
* We submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for a copy of any such reports on Aug. 30, and on Sept. 25 requested that Arlington expedite the processing of its request.
* American Oversight’s lawsuit asks the court to grant a preliminary injunction and to order the Army to produce all non-exempt, responsive records.


On the Records

Mark Martin: Lesser-Known Legal Mind Behind 2020 Election Subversion Efforts
The Intercept ([link removed]) this week published an in-depth account of former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Mark Martin’s involvement in efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election, citing records ([link removed]) obtained ([link removed]) by American Oversight that shed light on Martin’s legal influence.
* Documents we obtained show that, weeks after the 2020 election, Martin was in communication with multiple state attorneys general about legally challenging other states’ results.


“By late November 2020, Martin was helping shop the ‘state v. state’ idea around to Republican attorneys general in at least three states — including South Carolina, Louisiana, and Texas,” Intercept’s Shawn Musgrave reported.
* Martin was in touch with South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson just days before Wilson announced South Carolina would join Texas AG Ken Paxton’s lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, the documents show.
* Other records reveal that Martin helped contrive and actively supported ([link removed]) that lawsuit.
* Martin — who currently works at High Point University’s law school in North Carolina — supplied former Arizona Rep. Mark Finchem with the legal theory of “plenary” power, which became a go-to argument for disputing the election results, the Intercept reported.


Other Stories We're Following

Election Denial and Threats to Democracy
* Election denying state rep sues WEC to force state out of voter data sharing organization (Wisconsin Examiner ([link removed]) )
* Republicans’ non-citizen voting myth sets stage to claim stolen election (Guardian ([link removed]) )
* Tina Peters, former Mesa County clerk, sentenced to 9 years in prison over voting systems breach (News from the States ([link removed]) )
* Domestic extremists with ‘election-related grievances’ could turn to violence in final weeks of election, FBI and DHS warn (CNN ([link removed]) )
* Georgia Republicans sow doubt about Dominion voting machines in 2020 throwback (CNN ([link removed]) )
* Trump allies bombard the courts, setting stage for post-election fight (New York Times ([link removed]) )


Voting Rights
* Hurricane Helene scrambles mail and early voting plans in North Carolina (NBC News ([link removed]) )
* Voting rights groups want judge’s ruling on Alabama absentee ballot law to move forward (Alabama Reflector ([link removed]) )
* College students already faced barriers to voting — and states are adding more (19th News ([link removed]) )
* Ohio county elections officials are wrestling with mass voter registration challenges (Ohio Capital Journal ([link removed]) )
* Trump-aligned GOP group sues to get the names of 218K improperly registered voters (Arizona Mirror ([link removed]) )
* ​​Fulton County judge says he’ll rule before Election Day on new State Election Board rules (Georgia Recorder ([link removed]) )


In the States
* Omaha officer followed policy when he fatally shot a fleeing man 8 times, police chief says (Associated Press ([link removed]) )
* A pair of billionaire preachers built the most powerful political machine in Texas. That’s just the start. (ProPublica ([link removed]) )
* Former caseworker testifies in defense of Missouri transgender health care ban (Missouri Independent ([link removed]) )
* Idaho AG accuses pediatrics academy of possible consumer violations over gender care policies (Idaho Capital Sun ([link removed]) )
* Ryan Walters responds in court to Moore Public School student's pronouns lawsuit (Oklahoman ([link removed]) )
* How a school voucher supporter won in a Texas House district with almost no private schools (Texas Tribune ([link removed]) )
* Major publishers renew lawsuit against Iowa's school book ban (Axios ([link removed]) )


Abortion and Reproductive Rights
* Georgia judge lifts six-week abortion ban after deaths of two women who couldn’t access care (ProPublica ([link removed]) )
* Atlanta clinics are preparing for a potential surge in abortion appointments (Atlanta Journal-Constitution ([link removed]) )
* Georgia AG appeals ruling overturning state’s six-week abortion ban (News from the States ([link removed]) )
* It's harder to pay and travel for abortion care and support funds are struggling (NPR ([link removed]) )


Government Transparency and Public Records Law
* Legislature aims to require waiver for public access to behind-the-scene bill drafting discussions (Daily Montanan ([link removed]) )


Immigration
* Biden expands asylum restrictions at the southern border (New York Times ([link removed]) )
* Texas can't sue over Biden 'public charge' immigration rule, US judge says (Reuters ([link removed]) )
* Lack of translation services pervasive in Louisiana immigration detention, advocates say (Louisiana Illuminator ([link removed]) )


Trump Accountability
* Judge unseals new evidence in federal election case against Trump (New York Times ([link removed]) )
* How a judge will weigh immunity in Trump’s Jan. 6 case (New York Times ([link removed]) )
* Pence and Trump’s frayed relationship leading up to Jan. 6 insurrection on full display in latest special counsel filing (CNN ([link removed]) )

Donate to American Oversight ([link removed])
Thank you again for following our latest news. We are grateful for your support and for helping us hold government accountable.

============================================================
** Share ([link removed])
** Share ([link removed])
** Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Famericanoversight%2Fnews-roundupmiracle-drugs-and-trumps-alternate-reality-20310304)
** Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Famericanoversight%2Fnews-roundupmiracle-drugs-and-trumps-alternate-reality-20310304)
American Oversight
1030 15th Street NW
Suite B255
Washington, DC xxxxxx
USA
** unsubscribe ([link removed])