American Voters Want Solutions

Walz and Vance Debate Immigration

Greetings,

During the vice-presidential debate Tuesday night, immigration became a key issue as Democratic candidate Tim Walz and Republican candidate JD Vance exchanged views on how to best address the challenges at the U.S. southern border.

Senator Vance strongly criticized the Biden-Harris administration’s handling of immigration, pointing to Vice President Kamala Harris, whom he labeled the "border czar." He argued that under her leadership, the U.S. saw a rise in illegal immigration, which he claimed had reached 25 million unauthorized immigrants, a misleading statement since most estimates, including those from the Department of Homeland Security, place the number closer to 11 million. Vance contended that this influx strained resources and contributed to higher housing costs across the country, which has been proven to be false. Vance also linked immigration to other issues such as drug trafficking and the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. through the southern border, a point often emphasized by the Republican party.

Governor Walz took a different approach, acknowledging that immigration issues exist but placing the blame squarely on Donald Trump. He argued that the former president disrupted a recent bipartisan deal that could have enhanced border security and streamlined the immigration process. Walz emphasized that instead of focusing on militarized approaches, more effective immigration solutions should be pursued through diplomacy and legal pathways. He also countered Vance’s narrative by emphasizing that while Vice President Harris had been tasked with addressing the root causes of migration from Central America, she was not responsible for the broader immigration policy failures.

This debate highlighted the clear ideological divide between the two candidates on immigration, with Vance favoring stricter enforcement and blaming the current administration for perceived border failures, and Walz advocating for comprehensive reform and criticizing Trump’s handling of the issue. Recent polling has shown that voters across the political spectrum generally agree on immigration reform policies.

These contrasting perspectives reflect broader national conversations about the intersection of immigration enforcement, community safety, and policy reform. As discussed in a recent article by Stewart Verdery in The Hill the current immigration policy debate presents a critical moment for us to advocate for reforms that uphold security while also recognizing the economic and moral imperatives of compassionate immigration policies. Our call to action is to continue pushing for bipartisan solutions that honor our nation’s values. Now is the time to engage with policymakers to ensure that they prioritize immigration solutions that reflect our core principles.

Stay committed and hopeful,

Monica

Monica Espinoza
Field and Constituencies Intern
National Immigration Forum

NEWS CLIPS TO NOTE: