From Hudson Institute Weekend Reads <[email protected]>
Subject How to Restore American Hard Power against the New Axis of Aggressors
Date September 28, 2024 11:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
No images? Click here [link removed]

Weekend Reads

Foreign policy and political reporter Barak Ravid interviews Michael Doran at Axios House on September 24, 2024. (Sam Popp on behalf of Axios)

How to Restore American Hard Power against the New Axis of Aggressors [[link removed]]

In response to President Joe Biden’s final address to the United Nations General Assembly, Senior Fellow Michael Doran [[link removed]], at Axios House in New York City [[link removed]], discussed how although Biden “wanted to go down in history as a peacemaker,” the president’s ideas about how to bring about peace in the world are failing and have emboldened an axis of aggressors that includes Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.

Watch the full conversation here. [[link removed]]

Then, on Thursday, Hudson’s Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]] hosted a panel with Senator Tom Cotton (R-AK), Palantir’s Joe Lonsdale and Shyam Sankar, and Nadia Schadlow [[link removed]] to discuss why the United States needs to invest in its military to deter this axis, and how the Pentagon can do so more intelligently.

“If you think it’s expensive to preserve the peace, you should take a look at what it costs to win a war—and, even worse, to lose a war.”

— Tom Cotton

Watch the event, read the transcript, or listen here. [[link removed]]

Key Insights

1. The Biden administration has failed to combat the rise of the axis of aggressors.

“They’re on the rise. And we feel that especially in [the Middle East]. So President Biden wants Afghanistan to be the sign—you know, he said I wanted to bring these wars to an end. So he certainly brought Americans home, and he scaled back American military deployment in certain parts of the world. But there isn’t a sense that this has brought about a more peaceful world at all. So that’s a message that may resonate to some in domestic American politics. But if you’re sitting in Tokyo or you’re sitting in Seoul or in Jerusalem, none of America’s allies that are on the front line against Russia, China, and Iran . . . feel like they’re in a safer world now as a result.”

— Michael Doran [[link removed]]

2. Attacks on America’s allies and partners are attacks on the US-led world order.

“Biden has defined the problem from day one as a Palestinian-Israeli conflict. And he says . . . he wants a two-state solution, two peoples living side by side in peace. . . . [But] it’s not a Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It’s an Iran-Israel conflict, and that’s an objective fact because the Houthis are involved. Hezbollah opened up, as he mentioned, unprovoked on October 8. So it’s Iran versus Israel—I actually think it’s Iran versus the United States. If you frame it that way, that leads to a totally different understanding of what the solutions are. The solution is to deter Iran, not to come up with a deal where we can get [Yahya] Sinwar to agree with [Benjamin] Netanyahu.”

— Michael Doran [[link removed]]

3. To combat this axis, the US needs to rebuild its commercial defense industrial base while also harnessing the power of innovation.

“Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, 86 percent of defense spending went to companies that were both commercial and defense. Chrysler made cars, absolutely, but they also made missiles. And Ford made satellites until 1990. And we’ve somehow, having won the Cold War, rotated to this place where we have a coddled and relatively protected industrial base that is not participating in the broader innovation economy that entrepreneurs like Joe [Lonsdale] are building and funding. . . .When we look at Ukraine, we should wonder. Everyone cites that, Wow, isn’t it amazing that the Ukrainians took out half the Black Sea Fleet even though they don’t have a navy? And really, it’s, of course, because they don’t have a navy that they did that. And so how do we bring more of those concepts into what is otherwise a pretty uncompetitive and sclerotic series of institutions that need to challenge these concepts going forward?”

— Shyam Sankar

4. Investments in hard power are necessary to protect American citizens and troops alike.

“Too many of my colleagues in the Congress think that you can win wars with keyboard strokes or hashtags or lighting up your national symphony with another country’s flag colors. In the end, you win wars by killing the other side’s soldiers or destroying their stuff. . . . War may change in the technology that’s used, but ultimately the way wars have been fought and won forever is by closing with and destroying the enemy on the battlefield. And despite all the technological innovations you’ve seen in Israel and in Ukraine, it’s still Israeli soldiers and Ukrainian soldiers on the front line going door to door or fighting in the trenches. . . . Technology does change, and we need to change a lot faster in the United States like Israel has, like Ukraine increasingly is, to face the threats to America, especially the threat from Chinese communism.”

— Tom Cotton

Quotes may be edited for clarity and length.

Watch the event, read the transcript, or listen here. [[link removed]]

Go Deeper

The CCP Is Not a Responsible Actor When It Comes to Technology [[link removed]]

Mike Gallagher [[link removed]] warns that allowing the Chinese Communist Party to control America’s technology base could allow China to launch devastating cyberattacks [[link removed]] against the US homeland.

Watch here. [[link removed]]

The Brilliance of “Operation Grim Beeper” [[link removed]]

In a modern reworking of the Trojan Horse, Israel simultaneously detonated thousands of Hezbollah operatives’ pagers. Michael Doran [[link removed]] explains why this is one of the most astonishing, precise, and successful intelligence feats ever in a Hudson memo [[link removed]].

Read here. [[link removed]]

The Future of US and Allied Hypersonic Missile Programs [[link removed]]

As Russian and Chinese advancements in hypersonic missiles [[link removed]] threaten to surpass America’s ability to respond, Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]] hosted congressional, government, and industry officials to discuss the future of American hypersonics.

Watch or listen here. [[link removed]]

Act Now

Be a part of promoting American leadership and engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future for us all.

Donate Today [[link removed]] [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Forward [link removed] Hudson Institute

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Fourth Floor

Washington, D.C. 20004 Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis