Make America free again.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: September 26, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------


** Make the Government Pay for Its Misconduct: TRI Calls on Court to Hold Government Liable for Reckless Asset Seizures
------------------------------------------------------------

NEW YORK, NY — The Rutherford Institute is calling on the courts to hold the government accountable for its misconduct ([link removed]) , especially as it relates to reckless civil asset seizures.

In a joint amicus brief ([link removed]) before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Ross, The Rutherford Institute and The Buckeye Institute warn against practices that encourage the government to avoid being held financially liable for wrongfully seizing the property of innocent individuals.

“If the government is allowed to avoid the financial liabilities associated with wrongfully seizing the property of innocent owners, it will recklessly or intentionally seek to forfeit as much property as possible to see what it can get away with,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Such a practice cripples the ability of the citizenry, especially the poor and vulnerable, to effectively seek protection in the courts and hold the government accountable.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

Historically, civil forfeiture laws were limited to specific matters like customs and piracy. But starting in the 1970s as part of the “War on Drugs,” Congress began enacting civil forfeiture statutes allowing the government to seize and keep the proceeds of drug crimes and the property used to facilitate them. By the mid-1990s however, concerns arose about the virtually unchecked use of civil forfeiture and the disregard for due process. In reaction to public outcry, Congress enacted the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”) with the goal of making civil forfeiture procedures fair for innocent property owners by giving them the means to recover their property and their attorney fees.

Like most attorneys in private practice, Richard Ross maintained a trust account to hold client funds for legal transactions such as real estate purchases and settlements. After Ross, 65, became a victim of fraud by a person posing as a client whose settlement funds were transferred into Ross’s trust account, the government suspected that some of the money in the account was related to a crime. But rather than seizing only that specific amount, the government seized the entire account even though it knew there was over $1.2 million in unrelated additional funds. Although the government never accused Ross of any wrongdoing, it nevertheless argued that all funds in the account were forfeitable, even though the government’s own policy warned against seizing third party funds from trust accounts.

Ross filed a claim and litigated in court for recovery of the unrelated funds. More than a year later and after Ross had spent over $100,000 in attorney fees, the government eventually agreed to return the seized funds, but because the government dismissed its case prior to the trial court’s ruling, the government asserted that Ross did not substantially prevail in his claim so as to entitle him for recovery of his attorney fees. The trial court agreed with the government, effectively allowing it to circumvent CAFRA. Ross then appealed to the Second Circuit. In the amicus brief, Rutherford and Buckeye warn ([link removed]) that not requiring the payment of Ross’s attorney fees sets out a roadmap for the government to evade the consequences imposed by CAFRA.

Joel S. Nolette of Wiley Rein LLP advanced the arguments in the amicus brief in ([link removed]) United States v. Ross ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated, and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fmake-the-government-pay-for-its-misconduct Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fmake-the-government-pay-for-its-misconduct)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2024 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])