In this mailing:

  • Judith Bergman: EU: Covid-19 Does Not Suspend Asylum Rights
  • Alan M. Dershowitz: When Judges Rule: A Comparison between the US and Israel
  • Burak Bekdil: Death on a Hunger Strike Unmasks a Hate-Filled Turkey

EU: Covid-19 Does Not Suspend Asylum Rights

by Judith Bergman  •  May 5, 2020 at 5:00 am

Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Send Print
  • Persons "in need of international protection or for other humanitarian reasons", however, are exempted from these restrictions on non-essential travel from third countries." — European Commission statement, March 30, 2020.

  • This means that people who apply for international protection cannot be turned away and that the rights of migrants and refugees to apply for asylum cannot be suspended, even in the time of coronavirus.

  • This policy was on display during the recent crisis on the border between Turkey and Greece, when Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan used migrants -- whom Turkey transported to the border with Greece -- as political blackmail, threatening to unleash a new migration crisis on Europe. At least 14,000 migrants were brought to the border, according to media reports.

  • As much as the EU remains committed to international law, it would seem that under the circumstances of a worldwide pandemic, which has forced countries to go to extremes in terms of limiting the liberties of their own citizens to fight Covid-19, it should be possible to find ways temporarily to suspend the right of third-country nationals to migrate to the EU.

Recent decisions by the European Commission mean that the rights of migrants and refugees to apply for asylum in the EU cannot be suspended, even during the coronavirus pandemic. Pictured: Migrants wait to be transferred from the island of Lesbos to the Greek mainland on May 3, 2020, in Moria. (Photo by Manolis Lagoutaris/AFP via Getty Images)

On March 16, the European Commission recommended a temporary restriction of non-essential travel from third countries into the "EU+ area" for 30 days. On April 8, the European Commission recommended that the temporary restriction be prolonged until May 15. According to the European Commission's press release:

"The Commission's assessment of the current situation points to a continued rise in the number of new cases and deaths across the EU, as well as to the progression of the pandemic outside of the EU, including in countries from where millions of people usually travel to the EU every year. In this context, prolonging the travel restriction is necessary to reduce the risk of the disease spreading further."

According to Margaritis Schinas, the Commission's Vice-President for Promoting our European Way of Life:

Continue Reading Article

When Judges Rule: A Comparison between the US and Israel

by Alan M. Dershowitz  •  May 5, 2020 at 4:30 am

Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Send Print
  • Were the Supreme Court of Israel to decide that Benjamin Netanyahu is legally prohibited from forming a government in which he served as prime minister because he is under indictment, it would be usurping the role of the Knesset (which has not enacted such a prohibition) and the electorate (which gave him plurality, knowing that he was under indictment), as well as undercutting the rule of law (which presumes indicted individuals innocent until and unless convicted).

  • Such a ruling would throw the justices into the "political thicket" (to quote the US Supreme Court) and further politicize the manner by which justices are selected. It would be a self-inflicted wound on the independence and neutrality of the Supreme Court. Finally, it would give too much power to prosecutors and police officials to interfere with elections, by issuing indictments that might not result in convictions

  • This is not the time to further politicize a great Israeli institution.

Israel's Supreme Court is becoming increasingly involved in political and electoral issues. Pictured: Supreme Court justices in session on May 4, 2020, in Jerusalem, Israel. (Photo by Abir Sultan/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

The book of Ruth begins with a cautionary description: "In the days when judges ruled, there was famine in the land." Though the Bible suggests no causal relationship between the judiciary ruling the people and bad things happening to them, history suggests that governance by unelected Platonic guardians is anathema to democracy.

Continue Reading Article

Death on a Hunger Strike Unmasks a Hate-Filled Turkey

by Burak Bekdil  •  May 5, 2020 at 4:00 am

Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Send Print
  • The placard read: "Let Nuriye and Semih live." Just one line -- it was a simple, peaceful wish that the two teachers would not die in prison during their hunger strike. The governor's officials and law enforcement authorities acted immediately. From security cameras, they identified the persons who displayed the placard and launched a criminal probe against them on charges of "supporting a terror organization"

  • This is a compilation of shame for Turkey. Bölek and other members of Grup Yorum have never been charged with engaging in any terrorist activity. They were prosecuted for allegedly sympathizing with a terrorist organization with their songs. With their songs, not guns or bombs.

  • Those in the free world do not have to care what ideology Grup Yorum adopted; what they should be aware of is the level of religious zealotry and overbearing governmental control that has been reached in a presumably "Western," NATO-member country.

The Turkish state is notoriously cruel to every ideology and its adherents that it considers "hostile." (Image source: iStock)

When someone dies on a hunger strike, there is often a political motivation. It is understandable, therefore, if supporters of that political motivation mourn the victim while opponents just shrug it off. One such death in Turkey, however, again unveiled how dangerously a thin line of deep hatred divides Turks along pro- and anti-government lines. This is a psychological cold war.

The Turkish state is notoriously cruel to every ideology and its adherents that it considers "hostile."

During 2000-2007, a total of 122 prison inmates died on hunger strikes and nearly 600 suffered permanent paralysis. They were protesting prison conditions. A more recent hunger strike in Turkey revealed how inhumane Turks (and their state) could turn when protesters are of an ideology that the state apparently regards as "hostile."

Continue Reading Article

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Donate
Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved.

You are subscribed to this list as [email protected]

You can change how you receive these emails:
Update your subscription preferences or Unsubscribe from this list

Gatestone Institute
14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022