[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Study: To US Papers, 'Identity Politics' Is Mostly a Way to Sneer at the Left Olivia Riggio ([link removed])


Election Focus 2024 Following the Democratic National Convention, the New York Times’ “Critic’s Notebook” (8/23/24 ([link removed]) ) published an analysis of Vice President Kamala Harris’ pantsuit choices during the event.

“For the most important speech of her life, the presidential candidate dressed for more than identity politics,” read the subhead.

“In the end, she did not wear a white suit,” the piece began, later explaining the linkage between the color and its symbolism of women’s solidarity. Fashion critic Vanessa Friedman outlined the significance of Harris’ navy blue suit choice in accepting the Democratic nomination.
New York Times: Kamala Harris, Outfitting a New Era

The New York Times (8/23/24 ([link removed]) ) said that Kamala Harris came to her convention speech "dressed for more than identity politics."

“Ms. Harris made a different choice. One that didn’t center her femininity—or feminism (that’s a given)—but rather her ability to do the job,” Friedman wrote, as if those points were mutually exclusive.

A politician’s fashion choices are undoubtedly symbolic. Friedman has also recently published pieces about Donald Trump’s use of his suits to define patriotism (6/14/24 ([link removed]) ), JD Vance’s use of his beard to portray traditional masculinity (7/18/24 ([link removed]) ) and Tim Walz’s use of rugged clothing to define his “regular guy” image (8/22/24 ([link removed]) ).

In each of these instances, the white male politician is using his style to communicate a message about his—and his constituents’—identities. But only in the piece about Harris’ clothing choice does Friedman use the term “identity politics,” lauding her for not defaulting to “when in doubt, women wear white!”

In fact, a FAIR study of US newspapers found the overwhelming majority of times the vague term “identity politics” was mentioned, it was referring to Democrats and the left.


** What is identity politics?
------------------------------------------------------------

Even though the right has taken to derogatorily using it against the left, “identity politics” is commonly understood to mean forming political alliances based on identities like religion, ethnicity and social background.

That definition applies equally to MAGA Republicans’ explicit or implicit appeals to white ([link removed]) , Christian ([link removed]) and traditional gender identities ([link removed]) as it does to the left’s emphasis on ethnic, sexual and religious minorities. The DNC and RNC’s pep-rally atmospheres are both designed to project unity under political—and politicized—identities.

But a FAIR study of newspaper coverage during the weeks of the Republican and Democratic national conventions found that news media largely peddle the right-wing application of the term. A search of Nexis' "US Newspapers" database for the phrase “identity politics” during July 14–21 and August 18–25 turned up 52 articles (some of which were reprints in multiple outlets) that related to the major parties, their conventions, and their presidential and vice presidential candidates. Forty-five of those articles used the term to refer to Democrats and the left, four used the term to refer to Republicans and the right, and three referred to both groups.

When Identity Politics is Mentioned in US Newspapers, Which Party Is Being Talked About?

A New York Times opinion piece by Maureen Dowd (8/23/24 ([link removed]) ) was one of the 45 articles that associated "identity politics" with Democrats and/or the left. It applauded Harris for how little she discussed her identity, except for promising that she’d sign a bill restoring abortion rights.

“Aside from that, she barely talked about gender and didn’t dwell on race, shrewdly positioning herself as a Black female nominee ditching identity politics,” Dowd wrote.

Harris “dwelling” on her race and gender—as someone who would be the first woman, first South Asian and second Black president in the country’s history—would have been poor judgment, Dowd implied.
Arizona Republic: Arizona mom shares 'everyday Americans' struggles at RNC: What she said

"While the left is trying to divide us with identity politics," the Arizona Republic (7/16/24 ([link removed]) ) quoted an RNC speaker, "we believe that America is always, and should be, one nation under God."

However, in two Arizona publications (Arizona Republic, 7/16/24 ([link removed]) , 7/19/24 ([link removed]) ; Arizona Daily Star, 7/20/24), another woman emphasized her lived experience as "a single mother" to uphold her support of Trump—without the term “identity politics” being assigned to her. Instead, Sara Workman, one of the “everyday Americans” who spoke at the RNC, was quoted assigning it to Democrats:

“While the left is trying to divide us with identity politics, we are here tonight because we believe that America is always, and should be, one nation under God,” she said.

The irony of criticizing “identity politics” while invoking a line in the Pledge of Allegiance that was added to the oath ([link removed]) in 1954 to assert the country’s Christian supremacy was lost on the outlets that published this quote.

Similarly, a piece referencing Vance playing up his “working-class roots” and “rags-to-riches” upbringing not only didn't acknowledge the “identity politics” in such a presentation, but granted space to another Republican source to use the label derogatorily against the left (San Francisco Chronicle, 7/17/24 ([link removed]) ). RNC committee member Harmeet Dhillon, was quoted saying Trump's decision to pick the white, male Vance instead of "a woman or a minority" was "a sign of maturity and confidence in our party being able to succeed based on our ideas, not on identity politics."


** The 'balance' double standard
------------------------------------------------------------

Another concerning idea echoed in the press was the assertion that Harris, simply by being a woman of color, would alienate white male voters, and therefore thank goodness she chose a white man as her running mate!
Detroit Free Press: COMMENTARY 5 things Harris can do at DNC to make this Michigan never-Trump Republican vote Democrat

In the Detroit Free Press (8/22/24 ([link removed]) ), a Republican wrote that Harris needed to "commit to ending identity politics" to get her vote.

In a commentary for the Detroit Free Press, headlined “Five Things Harris Can Do at DNC to Make This Michigan Never-Trump Republican Vote Democrat” (8/22/24 ([link removed]) ), guest columnist Andrea Bitley listed “commit[ting] to ending identity politics” as one of her stipulations. It's "historic" that Harris is a "woman of color," Bitley wrote, then connected that to an important qualification: "However, returning to the heart and soul of democracy and broad-based politics that don't play favorites with niche groups will make casting my vote easier.”

Bitley's implication is that being Black, South Asian or a woman itself requires special effort to avoid pandering to identity groups—and ignores Donald Trump's playing favorites with the extremely niche group of billionaires he counts himself among.

Before Harris officially became the Democratic nominee and announced Walz as her running mate, the Lexington Herald Leader (7/21/24 ([link removed]) ) in Kentucky discussed the possibility of another white man, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, becoming the VP pick.

“If you’re looking to balance a ticket that’s headed by the first Black and South Asian woman presidential nominee, then having a young white guy provides pretty good balance,” Al Cross, longtime Kentucky political journalist and observer, told the outlet. He added, “We live in an era of identity politics, and his identity is a white guy.”

The New York Times (7/21/24 ([link removed]) ) also reported:

Well aware of the cold reality of identity politics, Democrats assume that if Ms. Harris, the first Black and Asian American woman to be vice president, were nominated to the presidency, she would most likely balance her ticket with a white man.

In other words, the press regularly advises Harris to avoid identity politics at all costs—except when the identity being favored is white male.

These pieces did at least acknowledge that white and male are identities, but didn’t acknowledge the double-standard of Harris being called to “balance” her ticket out with a white man, when the last 43 of 46 presidencies have been held by white men with white male running mates ([link removed]) .


** Both-sidesing
------------------------------------------------------------
Boston Globe: America Is at a Turning Point, Yet Again

Some say Donald Trump is a "threat to democratic values"; others say "identity politics" (and federal regulation) are the "true threat" (Boston Globe, 7/21/24 ([link removed]) ).

Meanwhile, the Boston Globe equated the dangers of "identity politics" to Trump's threat to democracy. Guest columnist (and former Washington bureau chief) David Shribman ([link removed]) (7/21/24) ([link removed]) quoted Hamilton College political scientist Philip Klinkner:

The Republicans believe the country is halfway to the Soviet gulag. The Democrats believe the country is halfway to Adolf Hitler. They both see this election in apocalyptic terms.

Shribman continued:

Both sides—those who believe Donald Trump represents a threat to democratic values, and those who believe that identity politics and an inclination toward a highly regulatory federal government are the true threat—consider this year's election a moment that will define the country for a generation.

People on the left believe Trump’s America is “halfway to Adolf Hitler” because many of his supporters are literal neo-Nazis ([link removed]) . They believe Trump is a threat to democratic values because he encouraged his followers to carry out a deadly insurrection on the Capitol after he could not accept that he lost the 2020 election, and he is preparing to overturn ([link removed]) the 2024 vote.

People on the right see the US as “halfway to the Soviet gulag” because…Democrats want you to acknowledge slavery and respect they/them pronouns?

This false equivalence is dangerous, and it is difficult to understand how white supremacy, a worldview based entirely on race, is not considered “identity politics” in this case.


** Rare mentions of the right
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: On Cat Ladies, Mama Bears and ‘Momala’

Tressie McMillan Cottom (New York Times, 8/19/24 ([link removed]) ): J.D. Vance's evasions on his "childless cat ladies" line "reveal the wink-wink of today’s egregious right-wing identity politics and point to the ways that this election’s identity politics might play out through innuendo and metaphor."

Out of the four articles that used the term “identity politics” to refer to the right, three were from New York Times writers.

In an opinion piece for the New York Times, Tressie McMillan Cottom (8/19/24 ([link removed]) ) referred to the “egregious right-wing identity politics” in the context of Vance’s uncreative—and Gileadean ([link removed]) —attacks on “childless cat ladies.” The Times' TV critic (7/19/24 ([link removed]) ) also referenced the performance of macho male identity politics at the testosterone-laden displays at the RNC, saying, "This is what male identity politics looks like."

Lydia Polgreen interrogated the derogatory application of the term “DEI candidate” to Harris, arguing that if Harris is a “DEI candidate,” so is Vance (New York Times, 7/21/24 ([link removed]) ). Polgreen argued:

All politics is, at some level, identity politics—the business of turning identity into power, be it the identity of a candidate or demographic group or political party or region of the country.

Pointing out that white is a race, male is a gender and identity plays into all politics are arguments missing from most of the coverage, which failed to truly interrogate what people really mean when they apply these terms only to people of color and other minorities.

The fourth piece applying "identity politics" to the right came from the right-wing Washington Times (7/16/24 ([link removed]) ) under a headline declaring that Black Republican speakers at the RNC "Put Identity Politics to Rest"—after leaning on their family "histories" that included slavery, cotton picking and "the Jim Crow South." "That was where the identity politics ended," the paper assured readers.


** Invisible identities
------------------------------------------------------------

Race theorists like john a. powell ([link removed]) have long interrogated the idea of whiteness and maleness being treated as “invisible” defaults:

White people have the luxury of not having to think about race. That is a benefit of being white, of being part of the dominant group. Just like men don't have to think about gender. The system works for you, and you don't have to think about it.... The Blacks have race; maybe Latinos have race; maybe Asians have race. But they're just white. They're just people. That's part of being white.

San Diego Union Tribune: Biden Is Gone. What Is Next?

Harris as vice president is a "symptom" of the Democrats' "perspective...based on identity politics." (San Diego Union Tribune, 7/21/24 ([link removed]) ).

This belief that the normal, default human form is white and male is what allows people like Tom Shepard, a longtime San Diego political consultant quoted in the San Diego Union Tribune (7/21/24 ([link removed]) ), to imply that Harris being chosen for the 2020 ticket as vice president is merely a symptom of the Democratic Party’s embrace of identity politics, and one of the “fundamental problems” with the party’s policy:

The Democratic Party, for all of its strengths, has over the last several decades kind of developed a perspective that is based on identity politics, and the reason that Kamala Harris was on the Democratic ticket as vice president is, at least in part, a symptom of that approach.

It’s the same reason why terms like Critical Race Theory (CRT), Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI), “diversity hire” and “identity politics” are used derogatorily against people of color, women and sexual minorities, disabled people and other underrepresented groups that dare to attempt to achieve equity with white men (CounterSpin, 8/8/24 ([link removed]) ; FAIR.org, 7/10/21 ([link removed]) ).

Without specificity in definition and equal application to either party’s politicking based on identities, “identity politics” becomes yet another dog-whistle used against those who simply dare to not be white or male.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .