View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear Progressive Reader,
Presidential debates in the modern United States have become largely performative events. For the most part, candidates do not answer questions, but rather repeat pre-rehearsed statements with the intent of gaining points with their respective base of supporters, and perhaps gaining points with undecided viewers. In that way, last Tuesday’s debate was not much different. But at the same time, debates in this accelerated 2024 campaign season may well have made more difference in the outcome of the election that any others since the very first televised debates in 1960 between John Kennedy and Richard Nixon.
The four televised debates between Kennedy and Nixon took place ([link removed]) over the four weeks between September 26 and October 21, 1960. Three of those four remain ([link removed]) at the top ([link removed]) of the Nielsen ratings list of the most viewed in history, garnering viewership from up to 61 percent of all U.S. households. The first debate claimed ([link removed]) as many as 65 million television viewers (at a time when the U.S. population was 179 million) as compared with 67 million ([link removed]) this past week, at a time when the
nation’s population is nearly double 1960’s level (although that number does not include Internet viewership and countless replays on social media). Nixon’s performance in those debates is widely credited ([link removed]) with his loss in the race—he simply did not know how to use the medium of television (or the subtleties of the use of make-up).
There have certainly been memorable moments in both vice-presidential and presidential debates of recent years—Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s 1988 rebuke ([link removed]) of Senator Dan Quayle: “You’re no Jack Kennedy,” Vice President Mike Pence’s 2020 two-minute encounter ([link removed]) with a house fly, Donald Trump’s menacing circling ([link removed]) around former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016, and Senator Joe Biden’s “Will you shut up man” response ([link removed]) to Trump in 2020—but perhaps the most significant moment in debate history was President Joe Biden’s poor performance ([link removed]) in June 2024. Within weeks Biden would step aside, opening the race to a new and dramatically time-compressed campaign by Vice President Kamala Harris for th
e presidency.
Harris’s performance this past week has won resounding ([link removed]) praise ([link removed]) and prompted Trump to announce ([link removed]) there would be no additional debates. Jonathan Capehart of The Washington Post had perhaps the best response ([link removed]) when he told PBS News Hour on Friday night, “I would like another debate between the two of them so we can talk about [policy issues and their proposals]. But that ain't ever going to happen.”
This week on our website, young first-time voter Sriya Tallapragada writes ([link removed]) about her conversations with other young voters. “The conversations I had [at a gathering called America in One Room] about Project 2025 are evidence that young voters are starting to look past political theater and to critically analyze the platforms that politicians are running on. After all, these policies will affect the future of our democracy—and we should be talking about it,” she says. Plus, Jeff Abbott reports on ([link removed]) the first-ever Panamerican Congress, bringing together lawmakers from North, Central, and South America, and Mike Ervin expresses ([link removed]) concern and outrage over the reemergence of preventable polio
in our lifetime. Also, physician Lisa Doggett pens an op-ed ([link removed]) on the fact that “we can’t fix health care if we’re not talking about it,” and John Raphling of Human Rights Watch opines ([link removed]) that destroying encampments is not the way to solve the crisis of homelessness.
Please keep reading, and we will keep bringing you important articles on these and other issues of our time.
Sincerely,
Norman Stockwell
Publisher
P.S. – If you like this newsletter, please consider forwarding it to a friend. If you know someone who would like to subscribe to this free weekly email, please share this link: [link removed].
P.P.S. – If you don’t already subscribe to The Progressive in print or digital form, please consider doing so today ([link removed]) . Also, if you have a friend or relative who you feel should hear from the many voices for progressive change within our pages, please consider giving a gift subscription ([link removed]) .
P.P.P.S. – Thank you so much to everyone who has already donated to support The Progressive! We need you now more than ever. If you have not done so already, please take a moment to support hard-hitting, independent reporting on issues that matter to you. Your donation today will keep us on solid ground and will help us continue to grow in the coming years. You can use the wallet envelope in the current issue of the magazine, or click on the “Donate” button below to join your fellow progressives in sustaining The Progressive as a voice for peace, social justice, and the common good.
Donate ([link removed])
============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 The Progressive, Inc.
P.O. Box 1021 • Madison, Wisconsin 53701 • (608) 257-4626
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
