View this email in your browser
An update from FactCheck.org 

A Busy Night of FactChecking 

As former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris were preparing in the days before the debate on Tuesday night, we were preparing, too. 

On debate nights, politicians often resort to false or misleading talking points they have delivered in recent stump speeches, interviews and social media posts. And so part of getting ready as fact-checkers means compiling information from recent (and sometimes not-so-recent) articles we've done on candidates. 

And it’s a good thing we did. The two candidates kept our team of reporters busy all night (and early into the next morning) writing new and rewriting old items. The repeats included Trump’s frequent and unsupported assertion about other countries emptying their prisons and insane asylums and sending people to the U.S. border. They also included Harris’ attempts to tie Trump to policies in Project 2025 -- a project that is being led and funded by the conservative Heritage Foundation -- even when Project 2025 proposals are at odds with Trump's own.  

But they threw us a few curveballs, too. Like Trump’s remarkable claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are “eating the dogs … they’re eating the cats. They’re eating, they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.” As we wrote, the Springfield mayor and police chief say there’s simply no evidence of that. 

In all, we fact-checked more than two dozen false and misleading claims. And we published – as Philadelphia Magazine noted – before most had even had their first cup of coffee on Wednesday morning.

Read all of our fact-checks from the presidential debate in our story, “FactChecking the Harris Trump Debate,” in English or Spanish.

Next up on the debate front, the vice presidential nominees will mix it up on Oct. 1.

HOW WE KNOW
SciCheck Editor Jessica McDonald used several sources to debunk former President Donald Trump's claim that wind energy is "the most expensive energy." Jessie got the latest figures from Lazard and BloombergNEF for the levelized cost of electricity — which provides the cost per unit of electricity generated after taking into account construction, maintenance and operation. Both showed that onshore wind is similar to or cheaper than natural gas or coal plants, even without subsidies. She got the same result when she looked at the Energy Information Administration’s levelized cost of electricity calculations, which include tax credits for wind. Read more.
FEATURED FACT
Project 2025's policy agenda was published online as a book titled “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise.” It’s the ninth edition in the “Mandate for Leadership” series, the first of which was published in 1981, during the Reagan administration. According to its authors, earlier editions have had success in influencing government policies. “The Reagan administration implemented nearly half of the ideas included in the first edition by the end of his first year in office, while the Trump administration embraced nearly 64% of the 2016 edition’s policy solutions after one year,” the Heritage Foundation said in a press release announcing Project 2025. Read more.
WORTHY OF NOTE
The annual edition of the Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey was released this week, and the results are disappointing, to say the least. 

The survey, which has been released annually since 2014 to mark Constitution Day, found that "less than half of Americans can name most of the rights protected under the First Amendment and under two-thirds can name the three branches of government," according to a press release issued by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, home of FactCheck.org.

Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center and a co-founder of FactCheck.org, explained in the release why civics knowledge matters. 

"Those who do not understand the rights protected by the Constitution can neither cherish nor invoke them; those who do not know which party controls the House and Senate may misattribute credit or blame for action or inaction,” Jamieson said.

Constitution Day is Sept. 17, which is the date in 1787 when the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met for the last time to sign the Constitution.  
REPLY ALL

Reader: How many officers died as a result of the January 6 attack at the Capitol?

FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely: About 140 law enforcement officers were injured during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, according to multiple official reports. But no officers died that day. 

However, one law enforcement officer died the next day from the complications of strokes, and four others later committed suicide. 

You can get the details of each death in our article, "How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?

Wrapping Up

Here's what else we've got for you this week:

  • "Trump Clings to Inaccurate Climate Change Talking Points": Former President Donald Trump, who has famously called climate change a “hoax” for many years, hasn’t used the word lately with respect to climate change. But he still clings to some similar arguments, and other claims he makes about climate change haven’t changed much over the years.
  • "A Guide to Project 2025": Project 2025 provides a roadmap for “the next conservative President” to fundamentally change how the federal government works. Former President Donald Trump has claimed he knows nothing about it. Democrats call it “Trump’s Project 2025 agenda.” Here, we take a look at the plan: what’s in it, who wrote it and what the candidates have said about it. 
  • "Online Posts Misrepresent Biden’s Proposed Tax on Unrealized Capital Gains": Social media posts have misrepresented a tax proposed in President Joe Biden’s fiscal year 2025 budget. The 25% tax on unrealized capital gains would apply only to those who have a net worth of more than $100 million, not to all taxpayers as the online posts misleadingly claim.
  • "Viral Posts Make Baseless Claim About Harris’ Earrings at the Debate": Social media posts baselessly claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris wore earrings equipped with audio devices in order to cheat during her debate with former President Donald Trump. Similar unfounded claims circulated before or after debates in 2016 and 2020 with Trump’s past political opponents. 
  • "FactCheck.org Featured on NBC10, Telemundo62": NBC10 and Telemundo62 in Philadelphia featured FactCheck.org in segments before, during and after the debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris.
Y lo que publicamos en español (English versions are accessible in each story):
  • "Verificación del debate entre Harris y Trump": El muy esperado debate entre el expresidente Donald Trump y la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris fue un evento combativo en el que los hechos fueron pisoteados y distorsionados repetidamente.
  • "Trump se aferra a argumentos inexactos sobre el cambio climático": El expresidente Donald Trump, quien por muchos años ha calificado al cambio climático como un “engaño”, no ha utilizado esa palabra en relación con el cambio climático últimamente. Pero el candidato sigue aferrándose a algunos argumentos similares y otras afirmaciones que hace sobre el cambio climático no han evolucionado mucho con el paso de los años. 
  • "Las cifras de Trump y Harris en el sector manufacturero de EE. UU.": Tanto el expresidente Donald Trump como la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris afirman que ellos contribuyeron a reactivar la industria manufacturera estadounidense, mientras que su contrincante la perjudicó. Y ambos han seleccionado los datos que más les convienen para respaldar sus argumentos. 
  • "Harris no ha cambiado su postura respecto del muro fronterizo de Trump": La campaña de Trump quiere que los votantes sepan que la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris dijo haber cambiado su postura para ahora apoyar el muro fronterizo de Trump, pero no quieren que piensen que Harris realmente cumplirá su promesa. Eso es engañoso. 
  • "Anuncio televisivo de Trump afirma falsamente que Harris ha ‘soltado’ al IRS para ir por los trabajadores que reciben propinas": El Servicio de Impuestos Internos (IRS, por sus siglas en inglés) no implementó un nuevo programa voluntario que ciertos empleadores podrían haber usado para informar las propinas que ganan sus trabajadores. Pero la propuesta es en parte la base de un anuncio televisivo de la campaña de Trump que afirma falsamente que la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris ha utilizado al IRS “como arma” y que ha “literalmente soltado” a la agencia para fiscalizar a los trabajadores que reciben propinas.
Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here.
Donate to Support Our Work
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2024 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania · 202 S 36th St. · Philadelphia, Pa 19104 · USA