From Portside Culture <[email protected]>
Subject How Eating Disorders Proliferate on X
Date September 10, 2024 12:05 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[[link removed]]

PORTSIDE CULTURE

HOW EATING DISORDERS PROLIFERATE ON X  
[[link removed]]


 

Adam Bychawski
September 7, 2024
Guardian
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Users say harmful content from accounts they do not follow appears
even after requests to block it _

,

 

Debbie was scrolling through X
[[link removed]] in April when some
unwelcome posts appeared on her feed. One showed a photo of someone
who was visibly underweight asking whether they were thin enough. In
another, a user wanted to compare how few calories they were eating
each day.

Debbie, who did not want to give her last name, is 37 years old and
was first diagnosed with bulimia when she was 16. She did not ­follow
either of the accounts behind the posts, which belonged to a group
with more than 150,000 members on the social media site.

Out of curiosity, Debbie clicked on the group. “As you scroll down,
it’s all pro-eating-disorder messages,” she said. “People asking
for opinions on their bodies, people asking for advice on fasting.”
A pinned post from an admin encouraged members to “remember why we
are starving”.

The _Observer_ has uncovered seven further groups, with a combined
total of almost 200,000 members, openly sharing content that promotes
­eating disorders. All of the groups were ­created after Twitter was
bought by the billionaire Elon Musk in 2022 and rebranded as X.

Eating-disorder campaigners said the scale of harmful content
­demonstrates serious failings in moderation by X. Wera Hobhouse MP,
chair of the all-party parliamentary group on eating disorders, said:
“These findings are most concerning … X should be held accountable
for allowing this harmful content to be promoted on its platform,
which puts many lives at risk.”

The internet has long been a breeding ground for content that promotes
eating disorders – sometimes called “pro-ana” – from ­message
boards to early social media sites including Tumblr and Pinterest.
Both sites banned posts
[[link removed]] promoting
eating disorders and self-harm in 2012 after an outcry over their
proliferation.

Debbie said she remembers the pro-ana internet message boards, “but
you’d have to search to find them”, she said.

This kind of content is now more accessible than ever and, critics of
social media companies argue, is pushed to users by algorithms, which
serve people more – and sometimes increasingly extreme – posts.

Social media companies have come under increasing pressure in recent
years to improve safeguarding after deaths linked to harmful content.

The coroner in the inquest of 14-year-old Molly Russell, who took her
own life in 2017 after viewing suicide and self-harm content, ruled
that online ­content contributed to her death
[[link removed]].

Two years later, in 2019, Instagram
[[link removed]], which is owned by
Meta, said it would no longer allow any content depicting graphic
self-harm. The Online Safety Act, which was passed into law last year,
will require tech companies to protect children from harmful content,
including promotion of eating disorders, or face steep fines.

Baroness Parminter, who sits on the all-party group, said that while
the Online Safety Act was a “reasonable start”, it fails to
protect adults. “The duties on social media providers are only for
content that children might see … And of course eating disorders
don’t stop when you’re 18,” she said.

Under its user policies, X prohibits content that encourages or
promotes self-harm
[[link removed]], which
explicitly includes eating disorders. Users can report violations of
X’s policies and posts, and also use a filter on their timeline to
report that they are “not interested” in the content being served
to them.

Watching just minutes of TikTok content can negatively impact a
woman’s body image, study finds
Read more

But concerns about a lack of moderation have grown since Musk took
over the site. Just weeks later, in November 2022, he fired thousands
of staff
[[link removed]],
including moderators.

The cuts significantly reduced the number of employees working to
improve moderation, according to figures supplied by X to
Australia’s online safety commissioner
[[link removed]].

Musk has also brought in changes to X that have resulted in users
­seeing more content from accounts they do not follow. The platform
introduced the “For You” feed, making it the default timeline.

In a blogpost last year
[[link removed]],
the company said about 50% of the content that appears on this feed
comes from accounts that users do not yet follow.

In 2021, Twitter launched “communities” as its answer to Facebook
[[link removed]] groups. Since Musk
took over, they have become more prominent. In May, X announced:
“Recommendations for communities you may enjoy are now available on
your timeline.”

In January, X’s competitor, Meta
[[link removed]], which owns Facebook and
Instagram, said it would still allow people to share content
documenting their struggles with eating disorders but it would no
longer recommend it and would make it harder to find. While Meta has
begun directing users to safety resources when they search for
eating-disorder groups, X allows users to seek such communities
without displaying any warnings.

Debbie said she found X’s tools for filtering and reporting harmful
content ineffective. She shared screenshots of posts from the group
with the _Observer_ that continued to appear on her feed even after
she reported it and flagged it as not relevant.

Hannah Whitfield, a mental health activist, deleted all her social
media accounts in 2020 to help her with her recovery from an eating
disorder. She has since returned to some sites, including X, and said
“thinspiration” posts glorifying unhealthy weight loss have
appeared on her For You feed. “What I found with [eating-disorder
content] on X was that it was much more extreme and more radicalised.
It definitely felt a lot less moderated and a lot easier to find
really graphic stuff.”

Eating disorder charities emphasise that social media is not the cause
of eating disorders and that users posting pro-ana content are often
unwell and not doing so maliciously. But social media can lead those
already struggling with disordered eating down a dark path.

Researchers believe that users might be drawn to pro-eating-disorder
communities online through a process akin to radicalisation. One
study, published last year by computer scientists and psychologists
at the University of Southern California
[[link removed]],
found that “content related to eating disorders can be easily
reached via tweets about ‘diet’,’weightloss’ and
‘fasting’”.

The authors, who analysed 2m eating-disorder posts on X, said the
platform offered “a sense of belonging” to those with the illness
but that unmoderated communities can become “toxic echo chambers
that normalise extreme behaviours”.

Paige Rivers was first diagnosed with anorexia when she was 10 years
old. Now 23 and training to be a nurse, she has seen eating-disorder
content on her X feed.

Rivers said she found X settings that allow users to block certain
hashtags or phrases are easily circumvented.

“People started using hashtags that were slightly different, like
anorexia altered with numbers and letters, and it would slip
through,” she said.

Tom Quinn, director of external affairs at eating-disorder charity
Beat [[link removed]], said: “The fact that
these so-called ‘pro-ana’ groups are allowed to proliferate shows
an extremely worrying lack of moderation on platforms like X.”

For those in recovery such as Debbie, social media held the promise of
support.

But the constant exposure to triggering content, which Debbie feels
powerless to limit, has had the opposite effect. “It puts me off
using social media, which is really sad because I struggle to find
people in a similar situation, or people that can offer advice for
what I’m going through,” she said.

X did not respond to a request for comment.

_More reporting by Adam Bychawski
[[link removed]]_

_The Guardian is globally renowned for its coverage of politics, the
environment, science, social justice, sport and culture. Scroll less
and understand more about the subjects you care about with the
Guardian's brilliant email newsletters
[[link removed]],
free to your inbox._

* twitter
[[link removed]]
* eating disorders
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit portside.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 



########################################################################

[link removed]

To unsubscribe from the xxxxxx list, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV