From Marc Elias <[email protected]>
Subject How are Republicans using the courts this election?
Date September 4, 2024 11:30 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Upgrade for access to all of my answers.

[link removed]

Preview of my members-only emails

In last Saturday’s edition of News You Missed, I mentioned that Republicans are using anti-voting litigation to “launder election denialism.” I received a lot of positive feedback and questions about this point. Some of you agreed wholeheartedly, but wanted additional examples. Others asked me to further explain how Republicans are doing this. A few of you weren’t exactly sure what I mean by “laundering.”

Nearly everyone wanted to know what we can do to stop it.

Since one of the goals of Democracy Docket’s membership program ([link removed]) is to have these discussions, I want to answer your questions and hopefully expand my commentary along the way.

But first a reminder of what I wrote.

Another way of normalizing their anti-democratic approach is by using the courts as a filter for these claims. As Marshall McLuhan famously observed, “the medium is the message.” By filtering their extremist approach through court cases, Republicans aim to create an air of respectability to them.

That is why, in the last week of August, we again saw a raft of new court cases filed by the GOP asserting extraordinary things. They won’t win, but they hope that by filing these claims in a court, it will make their crackpot theories seem less so.

Members always receive Q&As like this straight to their inbox. Consider becoming a member ([link removed]) for $120/year and you will also receive:
* Q&As from me, experts and candidates
* My two monthly members-only newsletters
* My weekend reading list and premium scorecard
* Breaking news updates with my analysis
* Exclusive merch discount codes and much more!

Democracy Docket relies on support from our readers. With less than 100 days until the election, your $120 membership ([link removed]) will go a long way in ensuring the team can keep you updated through November and beyond.

I read your email on Saturday (like I always do) and was wondering what you meant in the subject line by “launder election denialism.” Is that illegal?

— Nuri

I am glad you asked. It is my effort to explain why Republicans and their allies file so many extreme anti-voting lawsuits that they clearly have no chance of winning. Certainly, the GOP hopes to win at least some of these cases. However, I am convinced that another reason for these cases is to use the existence of a lawsuit to legitimize anti-voting concepts and behavior.

By filing a lawsuit, election deniers force judges to consider their crackpot theories and anti-democratic views. The media reports that the lawsuit has been filed and is being considered by a judge. They hope that the very fact that a court is considering their claims — even if they are rejected — conveys a sense of legitimacy that there are reasonable positions on both sides.

In my email, I related this to the famous saying that “the medium is the message.” We have learned that the medium through which an idea is communicated can matter as much as the idea itself. When court opinions are the medium, they convey a message of seriousness.

While this strategy is not illegal…

To continue reading, upgrade now ([link removed]) ! You will also receive my full responses to the above questions as well as my answers to:
* What about the raids we saw in Texas? Isn’t that the same thing as what you are saying is happening in court but without any of the same safeguards?
* If Republicans are getting a benefit from bringing frivolous cases and losing, what is the answer? How do we stop them?

UPGRADE FOR THE REST OF MY ANSWERS ([link removed])

Not ready to commit? Start a free trial ([link removed]) of our premium membership and unlock exclusive content for the next two weeks — no credit card or commitment required!
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

We also understand that not everyone is able to make this commitment, which is why our free daily and weekly newsletters aren’t going anywhere! If you prefer not to receive any freebies of our premium content, like this email, and only want to receive our free daily and weekly newsletters, you can opt out here ([link removed]) .

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Democracy Docket LLC . 250 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 400 . Washington, DC 20001-5825 . USA
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis