This is an offense to the Constitution.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: August 29, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------


** Rutherford Institute Defends Right of Political Speech and Right of Citizens to Criticize Candidates and Keep Voters Informed
------------------------------------------------------------

TALLAHASSEE, Fl. — Pointing out that free debate about public affairs is the essence of self-government and at the heart of the First Amendment’s protections, The Rutherford Institute has come to the defense of an attorney who was charged by the State Bar for criticizing his opponent during an electoral campaign ([link removed]) for a state prosecutor position.

In calling on the Florida Supreme Court to safeguard speech which is critical of public officials and keeps voters informed about significant concerns, The Rutherford Institute is challenging ([link removed]) the disciplinary action brought against Christopher Crowley by the State Bar, which Institute attorneys warn could chill political speech.

“No matter what their political persuasion might be, every American has a First Amendment right to criticize government programs or policies which they might disagree with,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Nowhere in the First Amendment does it permit the government to limit speech in order to avoid causing offense or hurting someone’s feelings, protect government officials from criticism, penalize hateful ideas, combat prejudice and intolerance, and the like.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

Attorney Christopher Crowley, a decorated Gulf War veteran who served in Iraq and Kuwait and was a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve for twenty years, was a 2018 candidate for Florida’s 20^th Judicial State Attorney position, which is the head prosecutor over several counties. Crowley ran against the Chief Assistant State Attorney in the Republican primary. During the electoral campaign, Crowley denounced his opponent as “corrupt” and “swampy,” raised concerns about her track record as a prosecutor, her familial connections to a suspected anti-Israel group, and what role she may have played in having Crowley arrested over a small campaign donation from a raffle.

Although there is no indication that Crowley recklessly made these statements in disregard of a high awareness of any probable falsity, the Florida State Bar, which regulates attorney conduct, brought a disciplinary action against him. The Bar’s rules prohibit attorneys from making statements attacking the qualifications or integrity of a judge, public legal officer, or candidate for election to judicial or legal office without having an “objectively reasonable factual basis” for the statements—but that is not the standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to punish defamation, and the rule’s self-serving protection to insulate a particular subclass of public officials and candidates from criticism raises the concern that “official suppression of ideas is afoot.”

The trial judge found Crowley in violation of the professional ethics rules, claiming that he did not have an objectively reasonable basis for making the statements about his political opponent during the campaign. Thereafter joining the case, The Rutherford Institute filed a Motion to Reconsider ([link removed]) based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Counterman v. Colorado ([link removed]) , arguing that the judge’s analysis violated First Amendment protections of free speech—which are heightened in an election context—by applying an unconstitutional standard that would enable claims through the State Bar to be weaponized to chill speech which is critical of public officials. After the trial judge refused to apply those First Amendment protections to Crowley’s case, Institute attorneys
advanced the free speech arguments in Crowley’s brief before the Florida Supreme Court, which is available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated, and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ftri-defends-political-speech-right-of-citizens-to-criticize-candidates Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ftri-defends-political-speech-right-of-citizens-to-criticize-candidates)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2024 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])