[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
NYT Uncritically Reported Israel's Version of Golan Bombing Bryce Greene ([link removed])

As the US-backed ([link removed]) genocide in Gaza continues, US media assist in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to widen the war, parroting the words of the aggressor. A consequential example of US press support for escalation was Western media’s coverage of the July 27 strike ([link removed]) that killed 12 Druze children on a soccer field near the town of Majdal Shams in the Israeli-occupied ([link removed]) Syrian Golan Heights.

Israel and the US immediately ([link removed]) blamed ([link removed] attack was conducted by,another Iranian%2Dbacked terrorist group.) the Iran-backed Lebanese organization Hezbollah for the strike—citing Israeli intelligence reports of an Iranian Falaq-1 missile being found at the soccer field (BBC, 7/28/24 ([link removed]) ).

But, in a move that Hezbollah expert Amal Saad called “uncharacteristic” (Drop Site, 7/30/24 ([link removed]) ), the group adamantly denied ([link removed]) responsibility for the attack. Saad, a lecturer in politics at Cardiff University, noted that targeting the Syrian Golan Heights—where many inhabitants are hostile towards Israel ([link removed]) —would be “illogical” and “provocative” for Hezbollah. Further, if the organization had accidentally committed an attack, Saad pointed to a precedent of the group issuing a public apology ([link removed]) in a case of misfire, with the organization’s leader, Hassan Nasrullah, visiting families of victims.
NYT: Fears of Escalation After Rocket From Lebanon Hits Soccer Field

The New York Times (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ) matter-of-factly described an explosion of disputed origin as a "rocket from Lebanon."

Despite multiple eyewitnesses describing an Israeli Iron Dome interceptor missile falling on the field during the time of the Majdal Shams strike (Cradle, 7/28/24 ([link removed]) ), the New York Times insisted on spotlighting Israeli and US claims in its headlines, rather than genuinely assessing the facts on the ground.

On July 28 ([link removed]) , the Times published “Fears of Escalation After Rocket From Lebanon Hits Soccer Field,” pinning the blame squarely on Lebanon’s Hezbollah. The next day, reporting on the potential escalations, the Times headline (7/29/24 ([link removed]) ) described the strike as a "Deadly Rocket Attack Tied to Hezbollah.”

While the July 29 subhead acknowledged that Hezbollah denied responsibility, the assertion in the headline undermined any reference to alternative explanations. Attribution to Hezbollah was then repeated without qualification in the first paragraph of the story.

Rebroadcasting government talking points not only does a disservice to newsreaders as Israel has a long history of misleading the public, but it also serves Netanyahu’s goals of justifying an escalation against Hezbollah. Predictably, the New York Times did not contextualize accusations of Hezbollah responsibility with information about Israel's current objectives for wider war. This continues a long trend of US media outlets obscuring and distorting reality in order to downplay Israel’s aggressive regional ambitions (FAIR.org, 8/22/23 ([link removed]) ).


** Israel an unreliable source
------------------------------------------------------------
Al Jazeera: Shireen Abu Akleh’s killing: Lies, investigations and videotape

Even lying about the murder of a journalist doesn't make Western journalists skeptical of official Israeli claims (Al Jazeera, 5/22/22 ([link removed]) ).

The first problem is that the New York Times accepts narratives from Israeli military and government officials at face value. From peddling evidence-free claims about Palestinian use of human shields during Operation Cast Lead in 2009 (Amnesty International, 2009 ([link removed]) ; Human Rights Watch, 8/13/09 ([link removed]) ), to dodging responsibility for its assassination of Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in 2022 (Al Jazeera, 5/22/22 ([link removed]) ), to consistently attempting to conceal its use of illegal white phosphorus munitions across the Middle East (Haaretz, 10/22/06 ([link removed]) ; Human Rights Watch, 3/25/09
([link removed]) ; Guardian, 10/13/23 ([link removed]) ), the Israeli military has been known to circulate disinformation to the international public for decades. Neither in headlines nor in the text of its pieces does the Times acknowledge this well-established history.

The current assault on Gaza has made the central role of lies in Israel's public relations arsenal clearer than ever. As early as October 17, there was controversy over the origin of a rocket strike on the Al-Ahli Arab hospital that killed hundreds ([link removed]) of Palestinians (FAIR.org, 11/3/23 ([link removed]) ). In the media confusion, Israel released audio it said captured two Hamas militants discussing Palestinian Islamic Jihad responsibility for the strike. However, an analysis by Britain's Channel 4 news (10/19/23 ([link removed]) ) found that the audio was the result of two separate channels being edited together ([link removed]) . In other words, Israel engineered a phony audio clip to substantiate the notion that it
had not committed a war crime ([link removed]) .

In November, Israel laid siege ([link removed]) to Al Shifa, Gaza’s largest hospital facility, leaving behind mass graves ([link removed]) . In another dubious public relations campaign, Israel justified its assault on Al Shifa hospital by alleging ([link removed]) that there was a Hamas command center underneath the facility, and that no civilians ([link removed]) were killed in the operation (FAIR.org, 12/3/23 ([link removed]) ).
NBC: Information missteps have led to questions about Israel’s credibility

What might be labeled "disinformation" when it comes from an official enemy is called "information missteps" from Israel (NBC, 11/18/23 ([link removed]) ).

During and after the assault, Israel pumped out high volumes of low-effort lies (NBC, 11/18/23 ([link removed]) ; New Arab, 11/14/23 ([link removed]) ) to convince the public that there had indeed been a Hamas operations base in the basement, going so far as planting weapons in hospital rooms to insinuate Hamas activity in the area (CNN, 11/19/23 ([link removed]) ). In the face of mounting public ridicule ([link removed]) , Israel’s official Arabic Twitter account was compelled to delete ([link removed]) a staged video of an Israeli actress boosting the Hamas-hospital-occupation theory
while pretending to be a Palestinian Al Shifa nurse (France 24, 11/15/23 ([link removed]) ).

However, after the mainstream outlets expressed skepticism at the claims and acknowledged that Israel had not provided sufficient evidence to back them up (New York Times, 11/17/23 ([link removed]) ; Guardian, 11/17/23 ([link removed]) ), Israel announced ([link removed]) that the supposed Hamas base was actually in southern Gaza.

At the same time as the Al Shifa raid, Israel stormed Rantisi Children’s Hospital ([link removed]) , and engaged in similarly preposterous propaganda efforts to justify its attack. Noting the presence of hospital gowns, baby bottles and toilets in the children’s hospital, Israeli spokesperson Daniel Hagari declared that this was proof of hostages in the facility (Jerusalem Post, 11/13/23 ([link removed]) ). Hagari (Al Jazeera, 11/17/23 ([link removed]) ) later pointed to what he said was a handwritten list of Hamas fighters hanging from one of the hospital’s walls, holding that “every terrorist writes his name and every terrorist has his own shift, guarding the people that were
here.”

But, this was not, in fact, a damning roll call of Hamas fighters, but instead an Arabic calendar. All that appeared on the calendar were the days of the week, though this was unknown to most of Hagari’s largely non-Arabic-speaking audience (Electronic Intifada, 11/14/23 ([link removed]) ).

Even recently, when Netanyahu visited Washington, DC, the Israeli prime minister gave a speech to lawmakers ([link removed]) that was filled with obvious lies ([link removed]) , including the contention that during attacks on Rafah, no civilians were killed, save for the two dozen who were murdered in a Hamas weapons depot explosion (New Arab, 7/25/24 ([link removed]) ). This flies in the face of numerous ([link removed]) reports ([link removed]) detailing fatal bombings and rocket attacks in Gaza’s southernmost city, including a single Israeli missile that killed at least 45 people (Al Jazeera, 5/27/24
([link removed]) ).

It is not possible that the writers and the editors at the Times—the supposed newspaper of record ([link removed]) —are ignorant of this seemingly unending series of deceptions. The decision to uncritically accept the word of the IDF regarding the Golan Heights strike demonstrates a deliberate editorial decision to knowingly advance the deceitful public relations goals of a genocidal state.


** Justifying a wider war
------------------------------------------------------------
Cradle: Washington gives Netanyahu ‘full backing’ to expand war on Lebanon: Report

Two days before the Majdal Sham massacre, Israel was reportedly told that "now is the right time" to escalate its war against Lebanon (Cradle, 7/25/24 ([link removed]) ).

In light of Israel’s past lies, serious journalism ought to refrain from regurgitating Israeli claims without significant context or qualification. This is especially true when doing so would advance goals as disastrous as Netanyahu’s current aims. In the case of the Majdal Shams strike, media proliferation of Israeli propaganda manufactures consent for escalating the war on the northern border—something Israel has long ([link removed]) stated ([link removed]) as its goal, and something American officials have long ([link removed]) been concerned ([link removed]) about.

Multiple generals have bragged ([link removed]) about Israel’s combat readiness in the north. In February, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant stated ([link removed]) that if a ceasefire was reached in Gaza, Israel would increase its fire against Hezbollah, and later said his government is preparing to send Lebanon into the “stone age ([link removed] prefers diplomacy-,Gallant%3A Israel can send Lebanon %22back,to Stone Age%2C%22 prefers diplomacy&text=During his visit to Washington,back to the Stone Age.%22) .”

Although some in the Israeli press ([link removed]) believe that Israel is incapable of handling a front against both Hamas and Hezbollah (Cradle, 6/28/24 ([link removed]) ), statements of readiness have intensified in summer months. The IDF announced ([link removed]) on June 18 that it had approved operational plans ([link removed]) for a war in Lebanon. Later, Axios (6/24/24 ([link removed]) ) reported that the US envoy to Lebanon warned Hezbollah, “The US won’t be able to hold Israel back if the situation on the border continues to escalate.” Just two days before the Majdal Shams strike, Israeli media reported that Washington had given “full legitimacy” to an IDF campaign in Lebanon (Cradle, 7/25/24
([link removed]) ), contrary to apparent earlier efforts ([link removed]) to avert ([link removed]) a wider war in the Middle East.

On top of neglecting to acknowledge Israel’s flimsy credibility in their Majdal Shams analysis, Times reporters failed to address this readily available information about Israeli military objectives. By ignoring Israel’s strategic aims, they are ensuring the reader doesn’t encounter further reasons to question Israel’s account about the strike.


** Who fired the rocket?
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: Israel Says It Killed Hezbollah Commander in Airstrike Near Beirut

Though it included a pro forma denial from Hezbollah, the New York Times (7/30/24 ([link removed]) ) referred throughout this article to a "rocket attack" rather than an air-defense misfire.

When reporting on Israel’s “reprisal” assaults on Lebanon following the strike on the soccer field, the New York Times (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ) again asserted Israeli claims as fact, saying in the first paragraph that "a rocket from Lebanon on Saturday killed at least 12 children and teenagers in an Israeli-controlled town," which "prompted Israel to retaliate early Sunday with strikes across Lebanon."

Was Lebanon—and implicitly Hezbollah—the source of the explosion that killed the 12 children? The Times does not care to examine this question, which warrants exploration. Israel's military chief of staff declared that the damage was done with an Iranian-made Falaq-1 rocket fired by Hezbollah, a claim that was uncritically repeated as fact by the New York Times (7/30/24 ([link removed]) ), despite the lack of independent corroboration. While there has been fighting in the area ([link removed]) , and Hezbollah acknowledged ([link removed]) that they fired Falaq-1 rockets at the nearby IDF barracks, there is significant reason to doubt that one of these rockets struck the soccer field.

The Falaq-1 was described by Haaretz (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ) as a munition that targets bunkers. But, images from the aftermath of the attack show that the damage to physical structures was far from bunker-busting. In an interview with Jeremy Scahill (Drop Site, 7/30/24 ([link removed]) ), the Hezbollah expert Saad cited military specialists who told her that "if [Hezbollah] had used the Falaq-1, we would have seen a much larger crater…. It would be much, much bigger and there would be much more destruction.”

As discussed above, Israel, well-known for planting ([link removed]) or fabricating ([link removed]) evidence for propagandistic ends, released images of rocket fragments that it alleged were found at the impact site, though the Associated Press (7/30/24 ([link removed]) ) was unable to verify their authenticity.

A substantial case can be made that the projectile came from the IDF. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, multiple eyewitnesses told Arab news outlets ([link removed]) the projectile was a misfired Iron Dome missile (Cradle, 7/28/24 ([link removed]) ; Drop Site, 7/30/24 ([link removed]) ). The New York Times omitted this from its coverage of this event.

Contrary to the mythos ([link removed]) behind the high-tech defense system, there have already been several cases of Iron Dome missiles falling ([link removed]) on populated areas within Israel since October 7 (Al Jazeera, 6/11/23 ([link removed]) ; Jerusalem Post, 12/2/23 ([link removed]) , 7/25/24 ([link removed]) ; Times of Israel, 5/4/23 ([link removed]) , 8/9/24 ([link removed]) ) with many such ([link removed]) instances
resulting in civilian injuries ([link removed]) and deaths ([link removed]) . There was even a report ([link removed]) of an Iron Dome malfunction near Majdal Shams, months before the recent July strike.

Bolstering the case for an Iron Dome malfunction, OSINT ([link removed]) researcher Michale Kobs noted ([link removed]) that the sound profile of the projectile suggested that its speed was constant until it hit the ground. Hezbollah’s projectiles constantly accelerate as they fall on their targets, since they are driven by gravity, whereas Iron Dome missiles are propelled throughout their entire flight.

For their part, the Druze people in the Golan Heights—an Arabic-speaking religious community which has largely declined ([link removed]) offers of Israeli citizenship—repudiated Israel’s displays ([link removed]) of sympathy for their slain children, rejecting the use of their suffering to advance Israel’s plans for a broader war (Democracy Now!, 7/30/24 ([link removed]) ). Locals even protested a visit from Netanyahu, chanting “Killer! Killer!” and demanding he leave the area (New Arab, 7/29/24 ([link removed]) ).

In the Times reporting on the strike, Lebanese and Syrian denials of Hezbollah’s responsibility for the strikes were acknowledged and reported, but portrayed as predictable denials that did nothing to alter the narrative. By omitting the evidence pointing to Israeli responsibility for the strikes, the New York Times assists Israel in yet another propaganda campaign to mislead the public in order to justify further regional strife and bloodshed.
------------------------------------------------------------

Featured image: Screenshot from a New York Times video (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ) that claimed to know that the explosion in the Golan Heights was caused by a "rocket from Lebanon."
------------------------------------------------------------

ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the New York Times at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) . Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your communication in the comments thread.


Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .