[link removed] [[link removed]] John,
By now, you may have heard about Project 2025. And we want to highlight one part of Project 2025 that’s flown under the radar:
Project 2025 would drastically change the structure and processes of the Federal Election Commission to further weaken the agency—and it also urges Congress to give wealthy donors more power and influence in our elections.
We’ll tell you a bit more about the plan below, but if you already know that you want to take a stand against Project 2025, then we’re asking for you to support our work. Donate to CREW today to help us limit the power of money in politics → [[link removed]]DONATE → [[link removed]]
Written by 31 former Trump administration officials, nominees and transition team members, Project 2025 is a policy framework for a potential second Trump presidency.
One chapter that is extremely dangerous was written by former FEC Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky, who, in 2017, was appointed by Donald Trump to serve on his “Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity” (which was disbanded after it was unable to turn up any evidence of widespread fraud in the 2016 election).
The chapter is all about loosening restrictions on lobbying activities and corporate contributions to political campaigns, ensuring that campaign finance law is *not* enforced and the FEC is weakened–handcuffing the governing body responsible for overseeing and enforcing federal campaign finance laws.
Here’s what Project 2025 calls for:
1. Raise the limits on what individuals can give directly to candidates
This would give big donors in politics even more power and influence. Specifically, it says, “Contribution limits should generally be much higher, as they hamstring candidates and parties while serving no practical anti-corruption purpose.”
In the 2024 election, individuals can donate $3,300 per election ($6,600 for the primary and general election combined) directly to candidates and an additional $371,700 to a party committee. Through vehicles like “joint fundraising committees” that allow candidates to give to multiple candidates or committees at one time, donors can give even more.
In the 2022 cycle, just 0.1% of people in the U.S. donated $2,900 or more to candidates (the limit in that election). So John, this proposal to make these limits “much higher” will only give big donors more power over the policymaking process and further drown out the voices of average Americans.
2. Appoint commissioners who won’t enforce the law
The FEC requires that no more than three of the six commissioners can be of the same political party.
Over the years, this structure has mostly given Republican commissioners the ability to block investigations or stop enforcement of our campaign finance laws, even when the nonpartisan attorneys or staff think it’s merited because 4 votes are needed to launch an investigation or take further action.
And, as CREW reported earlier this year,
“As of December 2023, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has received 59 allegations that Donald Trump or his committees violated the Federal Election Campaign Act. In 29 of those cases, nonpartisan staff in the FEC’s Office of General Counsel (OGC) recommended the FEC investigate Trump. Yet not once has a Republican FEC commissioner voted to approve any such investigation or enforcement of the law against Trump.”
As an agency already hobbled by partisan obstruction, appointing commissioners who would not enforce the law would lead to a further weakening of our campaign finance laws and less transparency about who’s trying to influence our elections.
3. Limiting campaign finance enforcement
Project 2025 also encourages the president to instruct the Department of Justice, which is responsible for criminal enforcement of campaign finance law, and the attorney general to defer to the FEC’s interpretation of campaign finance law and enforcement precedents, including in cases where the FEC is deadlocked. That would effectively empower anti-enforcement commissioners—who regularly vote as a bloc to impede enforcement —to dictate the DOJ’s approach to criminal enforcement.
This would likely mean fewer people would face consequences for breaking our campaign finance laws and more corruption would go unchecked.
John, the facts are clear: Project 2025 wants to make it easier for big money and corporations to influence their elections—and they want to make it harder for the government to hold lawbreakers accountable.
Not on our watch. CREW is raising the alarm about Project 2025 and fighting back against big money in politics. Can you make a donation to CREW right now to support our work? [[link removed]]If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:
Donate $5 → [[link removed]]
Donate $25 → [[link removed]]
Donate $50 → [[link removed]]
Donate $100 → [[link removed]]
Donate $250 → [[link removed]]
Other → [[link removed]]
Thank you,
Adam Smith
Vice President for Democracy Initiatives
CREW
Make sure this email goes to your inbox. Add
[email protected] to your address book.
Email is a key way for us to stay in touch and make sure you get the latest updates from our campaign. But if you would like to unsubscribe, click here [[link removed]] .
Sign up to receive our messages straight to your phone! This is the best and fastest way to support CREW's work. Text 'JOIN' to 40234 to get updates. Txt STOP 2 end, HELP 4 help.
If you'd like to donate to support our efforts, please click here → [[link removed]]
© Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 2020–2023
CFC 42218
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
PO Box 14596
Washington, DC 20044
United States
