To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

Ineffective and Expensive

The Price of Protectionism

August 17, 2024

Increasingly voices on the left and the right have embraced protectionist policies to promote jobs as ends in themselves, even at the expense of economic growth and broader prosperity. In the Wall Street Journal, AEI scholar and former Sen. Phil Gramm and Donald Boudreaux demonstrate the costs these misguided policies impose on Americans as taxpayers and consumers.

 

 

Protectionism is not the only misguided economic policy going mainstream in this campaign: No-strings-attached welfare programs like an expanded child tax credit have similarly gained traction. Matt Weidinger examines Vice President Kamala Harris’s long track record of supporting policies that pay people not to work.

 

The dependency and irresponsibility that these subsidy-based policies cause have contributed to a broader crisis of elite legitimacy in American politics. Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies Director Yuval Levin argues that America’s leaders must regain self-restraint if they are to win back the public’s trust.

 

The Supreme Court’s decision to overrule Chevron deference provides an opportunity for our institutions to do just that. By vindicating Congress’s lawmaking power against the administrative state, AEI’s Laurence H. Silberman Chair Adam J. White shows how the decision is a transformative step in restoring “the Founders’ ideal of good, constitutional government.”

 

One of the most important policy areas where Congress must reassert itself is net neutrality. AEI scholar Daniel Lyons, an expert on internet regulation, explores how the major-questions doctrine and the end of Chevron deference cast doubt on the Biden administration’s attempt to reimpose the policy by administrative fiat.

 

Ukraine and the Problem of Restoring Maneuver in Contemporary War

Ukraine’s ongoing Kursk offensive is the first example of successful maneuver warfare since the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive in a war otherwise defined by positional, trench warfare. How should Ukraine build on its success to continue restoring maneuver warfare, and what lessons should the US learn for future conflicts? In a new paper for the Institute for the Study of War, Critical Threats Project Director Frederick W. Kagan and coauthors analyze the transformational nature of the war in Ukraine and show how Ukraine and the US can adapt maneuver warfare to this new reality. The rapid pace of technological change, especially in drones and electronic warfare, provides opportunities for aggressive militaries capable of learning and experimenting quickly. With the right support, Ukraine can still win this war, and the US can be better prepared for the next great-power conflict.

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Who Is Kamala Harris?

Matthew Continetti
Commentary

Deterrence, Alliance, and Freedom Conservatism

Dalibor Rohac
Freedom Conservatism

The Media Memory Hole

Christine Rosen
Commentary

Inside the Campaign to Blacklist "Zionist" Therapists

Sally Satel
Free Press

Progressives’ Revealing Inconsistency When Elections Don’t Go Their Way

Robert Cherry
National Review

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

The Cost of America’s Illegal-Immigration Surge

Dan Wiser, Howe Whitman, and Steven Camarota
The National Affairs Podcast

A Pro-Growth Policy Agenda

James Pethokoukis and R. Glenn Hubbard
Political Economy

What Should I Read This Summer . . . LIVE! Get Married: Why Americans Must Defy the Elites, Forge Strong Families, and Save Civilization by Brad Wilcox

Danielle Pletka, Marc A. Thiessen, and Brad Wilcox
What the Hell Is Going On?

My Chat (and Transcript) with Google Deepmind’s Séb Krier on Artificial General Intelligence and Public Policy

James Pethokoukis and Séb Krier
Faster, Please!—The Podcast

Can We Childproof the Internet?

Shane Tews and Ari Cohn
Explain to Shane

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The time has come for Republican populists to explain how they intend to deal with shortfalls in federal benefit programs. Policies that increase labor force participation can certainly be part of the package, but populists need to be honest about the modest impact of such policies, and clearly indicate what additional measures they would support.

Sita Nataraj Slavov