[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Pundits Push for Regional Escalation in the Wake of Israeli Assassinations Gregory Shupak ([link removed])


Following Israel’s assassinations of Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut—along with a woman and two children (Al Jazeera,7/30/24 ([link removed]) )—and of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, corporate media pundits have called for the US and Israel to escalate the region-wide war.
Wall Street Journal: Weakness Won’t Deter Hezbollah After Its Soccer-Field Attack

According to the Wall Street Journal (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ), the "way to make war less likely is to announce that American munitions transfers to Israel will be expedited immediately."

A Wall Street Journal editorial (7/28/24 ([link removed]) ), using galaxy-brain logic, said the

way to make war less likely is to announce that American munitions transfers to Israel will be expedited immediately, as they were earlier in the war and as Congress has approved, and that all oil sanctions on [Hezbollah ally] Iran will be enforced again.

US-supplied weapons have already been a major part of Israel’s post–October 7 attacks on Lebanon, inflicting a terrible cost. The Washington Post (12/13/23 ([link removed]) ) reported that, in October, Israel fired US-made white phosphorus—incendiary material that can cause ghastly injuries and death—into the Lebanese village Dheira; the attack incinerated at least four homes, according to residents, and injured nine. In March, Israel used a US-provided weapon in an airstrike on the Lebanese town of al-Habariyeh, killing seven volunteer paramedics, aged 18–25, in violation of international law (Guardian, 5/6/24 ([link removed] used a US weapon,a violation of international law.) ).

Prior to last week’s Israeli attack on Lebanon, Israel had killed at least 543 people in Lebanon since October 7 (Al Jazeera, 6/27/24 ([link removed]) ), including roughly 100 civilians (BBC, 7/22/24 ([link removed]) ); US fighter jets have played a key role in Israel’s Lebanon campaign (Deutsche Welle,7/19/24 ([link removed]) ). Far from “mak[ing] war less likely,” US armaments enable Israel to kill and maim Lebanese people. (According to Israeli officials, Hezbollah attacks have killed 33 Israelis, mostly soldiers, since October 7—BBC, 7/17/24 ([link removed]) .)

The editorial invoked a tissue-thin casus belli on Israel’s behalf, saying that Hezbollah carried out a “rocket attack on Saturday [that] killed 12 children and wounded more on a soccer field in Israel’s Golan Heights.” One problem: There is no such thing as “Israel’s Golan Heights”; there is only Syria’s Golan Heights, which Israel has illegally occupied, illegally annexed and illegally settled (Foreign Policy,2/5/19 ([link removed]) ). Casting the deaths in Majdal Shams, the predominately Druze village in the Golan where the killings occurred, as an attack on Israel makes it sound as if Israeli violence against Lebanon (such as its Beirut bombing) is what the editorial calls Israel “defend[ing] itself.”


** 'Israel returns fire'
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: Israel Returns Fire on Iran and Its Proxies

The Wall Street Journal (8/1/24 ([link removed]) ) maintains that the assassination of a Hamas negotiator could help peace negotiations, as "Hamas politicians remaining in Qatar now know their lives are also on the line if they continue to resist Israel’s reasonable terms."

A second Wall Street Journal editorial (8/1/24 ([link removed]) ) pushed a similar line, deploying the headline, “Israel Returns Fire on Iran and Its Proxies.” Strangely, Iranian actions are not described as “return[ing] fire” for Israel’s years of attacks on Iranian territory, which have taken the form of sabotaging the Iranian electrical grid, cyberattacks (New York Times,4/11/21 ([link removed]) ) and murdering Iranian scientists (Politico,3/5/18 ([link removed]) ). Doubling down on its demands for belligerence, the editorial’s authors argued:

The US can help Israel prevent a larger war by putting pressure on Hezbollah and Iran. Expediting weapons to Israel, including deep-penetrating bombs that would put Iran's nuclear facilities at risk, would send a message, as would enforcing oil sanctions again. Sending US warships to the eastern Mediterranean, as after October 7, would also make Iran think twice about Hezbollah’s next move.

The Journal seems to think that doing the same thing over and over again—namely, sending more weapons to Israel, choking Iranian civilians through sanctions (Canadian Dimension,4/3/23 ([link removed]) ) and upping the US military presence in the region—will produce different results. Maybe this time, the authors seem to suggest, Iran and Hezbollah will decide to just let the US and Israel dictate what happens across West Asia.

Nor does the editorial explore the possibility that Iran might be less inclined to strike Israel if Israel were to cease carrying out assassinations on Iranian soil, bombing its embassies (Reuters,4/4/24 ([link removed]) ) or carrying outgenocide ([link removed] network Statement published October,to scholars and legal experts.) against Iran’s Palestinian allies.


** 'Response to Hezbollah'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: Israel’s Five Wars

For the New York Times' Bret Stephens (7/30/24 ([link removed]) ), Israel is at war not only with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, but with "Israel’s most strident critics" on campuses, with the "'yes but' thinking" that supports Israel while condemning civilian deaths, and with "Jews who provide moral cover and comfort to Israel’s enemies."

In the New York Times, columnist Bret Stephens ([link removed]) (7/30/24 ([link removed]) ) put forth a similar view, writing that

the world will soon know the full shape and scale of Israel’s response to Hezbollah for [the] rocket attack on a Druze town in the Golan Heights, which killed 12 children.

Another problem with this line of argument is that there is some doubt as to whether it was a Hezbollah projectile that hit the Golan, and a great deal of doubt as to whether, if it was Hezbollah’s rocket, it was deliberately fired at Majdal Shams (LA Times,7/30/24 ([link removed]) ).

Despite Stephens' suggestion that an Israeli assault on Lebanon would be a "response" to a Hezbollah "attack," only 20% of Majdal Shams residents have accepted Israeli citizenship, while the bulk of the town's inhabitants continue to be citizens of Syria (LA Times,7/30/24 ([link removed]) ).

Not content with last week’s attack on Beirut, Stephens wrote that

whatever Israel does next, it should be calculated to advance the national interests on all [fronts of its multifaceted wars]. If that means postponing a fuller response to explain its rationale, necessity and goal, so much the better.

The “fuller response” he has in mind seems to be more Israeli violence, since what it would be “fuller” than is the bombing of Beirut, and the premise of the article is that the Israeli government is fighting a five-fronted war. Worry not, Stephens assures his readers, any further Israeli bombings and assassinations will by definition be a “response,” and thus defensible.


** 'Iranian imperialism'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: America May Soon Face a Fateful Choice About Iran

Thomas Friedman (New York Times, 8/1/24 ([link removed]) ) recasts the Gaza crisis as "part of a broader Iranian campaign to drive America out of the Middle East."

Meanwhile, Stephens' colleague Thomas Friedman (8/1/24 ([link removed]) ) painted Iran as the primary aggressor in West Asia. He called Iran an "imperial power," condemning "Iranian imperialism" and "Tehran’s regional imperialist adventure." Iran's goal, he asserted, is “to control the whole Arab world.”

Since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, the state has carried out zero full-scale invasions of Arab majority countries (and zero such attacks on non-Arab nations). In the same period, the US, which is evidently not imperialist, and not trying to “control the whole Arab world,” has carried out full-fledged invasions of Libya and (more than once) of Iraq. In addition to annexing and colonizing part of Syria, Israel has repeatedly invaded Lebanon. Colonizing, occupying and annexing Palestinian land, and now committing genocide ([link removed]) against Palestinians, presumably also constitute the US and Israel seeking to “control” an important slice of the “Arab world.”

Yet in Friedman’s topsy-turvy universe, Iran is the main source of violence in the region. That misleading framing wrongly suggests that past and future acts of war against Iran are legitimate and necessary.

Nobody knows what the political and military outcome of a broader conflagration in the Middle East would be, but the human and environmental toll on the region would be colossal. High-profile pundits in America are doing their part to help such an outcome materialize.


Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .