96



Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

[link removed]

Donate

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]





CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN

Issue No. 182: July 2024

Subscribe

[link removed]

/ Read Online

[link removed]

/ Download PDF

[link removed]

A monthly update of media freedom news and analysis related to China

For daily updates in the Chinese language, follow FH_China

[link removed]

on X.



Analysis:

In the News:

Censorship

Harassment and detentions

Hong Kong

Beyond China

Read Online

[link removed]





Analysis: For Discontented Chinese Netizens, ​​​​the Charm of the Olympics Is Wearing Off

Many users see little to celebrate amid growing social, economic, and political constraints at home. ​​​​​

By Yaqiu Wang

[link removed]

Last week, Paris kicked off the 2024 Summer Olympics with a rain-soaked but dazzling opening ceremony. Since their inception more than a century ago, the modern Olympic Games have become one of the world’s most popular sports and entertainment events. They are especially important in China, where the accumulation of Olympic medals by Chinese athletes is closely tied to a sense of national strength.

This year, however, many Chinese internet users are expressing lukewarm feelings about the Paris Games.

One netizen wrote

[link removed]

: “Southern and northern China are experiencing floods. The disasters are serious. Even living is a problem, who has the energy to pay excessive attention to the Olympics?” Another asked sarcastically

[link removed]

, “If China wins 100 gold medals, can [the authorities] return my confiscated moped?”

A major news development in China last month concerned a report

[link removed]

that a large state-owned food company, in order to cut costs, was using the same tankers to carry cooking oil and fuel. The allegation sparked national outrage, intensifying a long-standing grievance among the Chinese populace regarding food safety. “[I]’ve heard the Olympics have started, but I have no interest in turning on the TV…. [I] now only care about whether there is toxic coal in cooking oil,” a netizen declared.

Some users questioned whether the government should be spending its money on the Olympics. For this year’s games, the Chinese government sent a massive delegation of 716 people to Paris. “Excuse me, but how does footing the bill for their airfare, hotels, and travel benefit us taxpayers?” one asked

[link removed]

.

The public skepticism likely has little to do with any diminishing interest in the sports programs themselves. It speaks more to the fact that many in China are facing hardship in their daily lives and therefore resent the government for spending lavishly on vanity projects such as the Olympics, rather than responding to citizens’ urgent needs, such as food safety, health care, and employment. Discontent resulting from a faltering economy is certainly growing. Freedom House’s China Dissent Monitor shows

[link removed]

 that protests increased over the course of 2023, with economic issues—especially the housing-market collapse—accounting for some 80 percent of all recorded dissent events.

There are also calls for netizens not to let the Olympics distract them from social problems. Xianzi, the women’s rights activist who rose to prominence after suing a celebrity anchor at the state broadcaster for sexual harassment, urged users to keep focusing their attention on an ongoing campus sexual harassment scandal

[link removed]

. A few days earlier, a student at a top university had posted a video online in which she accused her dissertation adviser of sexual harassment. The video went viral, compelling the university to fire the professor immediately. This was an unusually swift victory in a country where perpetrators of sexual harassment, especially those in positions of power, are rarely held accountable at all.

Online attention has become a precious resource for social justice causes in China. President Xi Jinping’s increasingly repressive regime has steadily closed off the avenues through which citizens could air their grievances and seek redress, prompting more and more individuals to appeal directly to the online public in the hope that a viral post might generate pressure on the authorities.

There has been some genuinely positive online chatter about the Olympics this year, but official censorship has curbed its spread. For example, Chinese feminists praised the opening ceremony for celebrating 10 French female icons, such as philosopher Simone de Beauvoir and political activist Louise Michel. A number of netizens then complained that videos and photos about the women were being removed from their social media.

Patriotism is woven into the fabric of the Olympic Games, and the ruling Chinese Communist Party has long utilized it deftly to drum up support for the regime. Sixteen years ago, the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, now often referred to as China’s “coming-out party,” showcased China to the world as a political, economic, and cultural superpower on the rise. Known for their extravagance, the 2008 games have continued to serve as a source of immense national pride.

But the Communist Party’s sports-nationalism playbook might be losing its potency along with the economy, as citizens’ immediate needs go unaddressed. And however much the Chinese people may love their country, no amount of gold medals can convince them to love a government that denies their basic desire for freedom and dignity.

Yaqiu Wang is the research director for China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan at Freedom House. This article was also published by the Diplomat

[link removed]

on July 31, 2024.





Censorship

WeChat censored articles following Suzhou hero's death: In late June, a Chinese man attempted to stab

[link removed]

a Japanese mother and her child in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province. Eventually, the man injured the two Japanese individuals and killed

[link removed]

a Chinese woman, Hu Youping, who was fatally stabbed while trying to stop the attack. Following Hu’s death, authorities in Suzhou proposed granting her the title of “Suzhou City Bravery Model

[link removed]

,” an honor for courageous acts, second only to the title “Bravery Hero.” A netizen challenged the authorities’ decision in a WeChat article

[link removed]

, arguing that according to local laws, Hu qualified for the hero title. The article was removed within one day. Another article mourning Hu was deleted

[link removed]

a few hours after being posted on June 29. A WeChat article

[link removed]

published on July 17, titled “It Has Been 22 Days, Who Killed Hu Youping?” was blocked.

Posts about food security scandal censored: Tanker trucks in China are being used to haul both edible oil and liquified coal without the tanks being cleaned between trips, according to a July 2 report

[link removed]

by the Beijing News. Following leads from the report, citizen journalist Gao Jianli mapped

[link removed]

out the driving trajectory of one vehicle tracked by the reporters. He found that the vehicle had travelled across eight provinces in the past six months, delivering varying loads of culinary oil and liquified coal to customers including Sinograin, the state-owned grain storage and transportation company. The reports evoked memories

[link removed]

of past food-security scandals, and triggered internet uproars

[link removed]

. On July 11, two days after Gao posted the findings on the popular video-sharing platform Bilibili, the video was blocked

[link removed]

. The same day, a platform offering truck-tracking data announced that it would indefinitely discontinue

[link removed]

the data-sharing service, citing a need to upgrade the system. A Caixin

[link removed]

report on the mixed shipping of oil and chemicals in waterborne transportation was also deleted, and at least six related hashtags

[link removed]

were blocked on Weibo.

Memoir by US VP candidate removed: On July 16, the book Hillbilly Elegy by US Republican Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance, which had over 400 reviews on the Chinese digital reading platform WeChat Reading, was removed

[link removed]

from the platform. The memoir explores the struggles of an American working-class family and critically examines socioeconomic issues like poverty, addiction, and lack of economic opportunity. The reason for the book’s removal on the platform remains unclear.

Sexual harassment allegation and discussions deleted: Wang Di, a PhD student at Renmin University of China, accused

[link removed]

her supervisor, Wang Guiyuan, of sexual harassment in a July 21 Weibo post featuring a 59-minute video. In response, Beijing police announced

[link removed]

they had launched an investigation, and the university issued a statement

[link removed]

on July 22 terminating Wang Guiyuan's employment and noting that he had also been expelled from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Wang Di's post, which garnered 2.2 million likes and many supportive comments, was later deleted

[link removed]

. Related discussions and posts, including comments from feminist activist Xianzi advocating for anti-sexual–harassment mechanisms in universities, were also quickly removed

[link removed]

.





Harassment and detentions

Prodemocracy activist detained over memorial activities: Human rights group Weiquanwang reported that prodemocracy activist Cheng Xiaofeng was criminally detained by Hunan police on July 6 on suspicion of "picking quarrels and provoking trouble." Cheng's detention was likely related to his visit to the city of Loudi to honor the late human rights defender Ouyang Jinghua, and his online memorial for Hu Youping, who was killed while attempting to protect two Japanese nationals during a knife attack in Jiangsu Province. Previously, Cheng publicly questioned

[link removed]

the authorities' handling of COVID-19 testing and vaccine issues online, leading to repeated harassment and intimidation of him and his family by the authorities.

Jailed human rights lawyer subject to mistreatment: In a July 8 statement

[link removed]

, the China Human Rights Lawyers Group reported that prominent human rights activist Xu Zhiyong, who was sentenced to 14 years in prison for "subverting state power," has faced various forms of mistreatment since his transfer to Shandong Lunan Prison in January. According to the statement, the prison temporarily stopped using his name, referring to him as "003" instead. Xu has also been relocated to a cell with four inmates instead of twelve. According to the statement, the other three inmates are closely monitoring him at all hours, a method used by Chinese prison authorities to deter potential opposition among jailed dissidents. Xu was also restricted from making phone calls to his family, and Xu's family faced frequent interruptions in their conversations during visitations, according to the group.

Arrests over Liu Xiaobo commemoration: As per a July 21 Radio Free Asia (RFA) report

[link removed]

, Zhejiang police arrested several individuals following a memorial in Haining, Zhejiang Province, on July 13, the seventh anniversary of Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo's death. Those arrested included members of the Independent Chinese PEN Center, an organization defending persecuted Chinese writers and promoting literary freedom. Most of those arrested were released after being reprimanded and having statements recorded by the police. Human rights advocates Zan Aizong and Zou Wei remain under criminal detention, with Zan Aizong facing charges of "picking quarrels and provoking trouble," according to his family.





Hong Kong

WSJ reporter dismissed over role in press union: On July 17, Selina Cheng, elected chair of the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA), stated in a post

[link removed]

on X that she had been dismissed from her position as a journalist at the Wall Street Journal. According to Cheng’s statement, before her election, a senior editor at the Journal pressured her to withdraw, describing the editor as having said that "employees of the Journal should not be seen as advocating for press freedom in a place like Hong Kong." Cheng refused to comply and was subsequently dismissed, with the Journal citing organizational restructuring as the reason. To Cheng, the Journal’s decision to fire her reflects the pervasive fear

[link removed]

felt by journalists in the city, dating

[link removed]\h%20HYPERLINK%20"[link removed]

to 2019 when the authorities intensified targeting of prodemocracy journalists. In an article

[link removed]

following Cheng’s dismissal, the state-controlled Global Times characterized the Journal’s decision as underscoring a desire to “distance itself to avoid being implicated,” should Hong Kong authorities seek legal action aimed at regulating the HKJA. The Wall Street Journal’s US-based union has called

[link removed]

for Cheng to be reinstated.

Free press conundrum in Hong Kong: Two BBC staffers resigned from their elected positions with the HKJA, reportedly under pressure from their employers, according to a July 19 Mingpao

[link removed]

article. A China Media Project report

[link removed]

suggests it is a common issue for foreign media workers in Hong Kong to face pressure on two fronts: from the state, as it seeks to suppress critical reporting, and from their employers, who may resort to internal pressure in order to maintain a presence in Chinese-mainland media markets.

Books taken down at book fair: Hong Kong authorities ordered sellers to remove

[link removed]

several books from shelves at the recent Hong Kong book fair, due to “complaints and legal advice.” The list included three books

[link removed]

authored by Allan Au, a veteran journalist arrested

[link removed]

in 2022 over allegations of publishing seditious materials. (Au was later released on bail and was not charged.) The Boundary Bookstore, a merchant at the Hong Kong book fair, created a “column

[link removed]

of banned books” by attaching sticky notes inscribed with the names of prohibited books to a support column. The column then became a popular photographic sight at the fair.

Beyond China

Beijing extends control over party members abroad: Chinese authorities ordered junior party members living overseas to study political materials and promote Beijing’s propaganda in their host countries, according to a July 3 Financial Times report

[link removed]

. The directive leaves some members of the diaspora in a dilemma: facing potential legal consequences as foreign agents in the host country if they comply, or facing repercussions from their home government if they refuse. Those seeking to end their party membership found it difficult, said the report: the only way to quit the party is to discontinue dues payment for six months, but those who decline to pay face harassment from local party authorities.





Take Action

Access uncensored content: Find an overview comparing popular circumvention tools and information on how to access them via GreatFire.org, here

[link removed]

or here

[link removed]

. Learn more about how to reach uncensored content and enhance digital security here

[link removed]

.

Support a prisoner: Learn how to take action to help journalists and free expression activists, including those featured in past issues of the China Media Bulletin here

[link removed]

.

Visit the China Media Bulletin Resources section: Learn more about how policymakers, media outlets, educators, and donors can help advance free expression in China and beyond via a new resource section

[link removed]

on the Freedom House website.





Copyright 2024 Freedom House

All rights reserved.

Freedom House

1850 M Street NW 11th Floor

Washington, DC 20036



update subscription preferences

[link removed]



[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]