From Michigan Department of Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject AG Nessel on Michigan Supreme Court Rejecting Legislature’s ‘Adopt-and-Amend’ Tactic
Date July 31, 2024 4:45 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Nessel Email Header




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:*

July 31, 2024




*Media Contact:
*Danny Wimmer <[email protected]>






AG Nessel on Michigan Supreme Court Rejecting Legislature?s ?Adopt-and-Amend? Tactic?





*LANSING* - Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel praised today?s Michigan Supreme Court opinion [ [link removed] ] in "Mothering Justice et al v Nessel and State of Michigan, "which struck down the Michigan Legislature?s 2018 use of the 'adopt-and-amend' tactic to block ballot initiatives. The Court ruled that lawmakers cannot sidestep the voter initiative process by adopting a petition measure to prevent it from appearing on the ballot, only to immediately amend it to alter its original intent.?

?This is a landmark victory for Michigan voters and a resounding affirmation of the power of direct democracy,? Nessel said. ?The Legislature cannot manipulate its power to undermine the will of the people. This ruling sends a clear message that elected officials cannot disregard the voices of their constituents. I am glad to see the Court recognize and respect that the people reserved for themselves the power of initiative, a crucial tool meant to shape the laws that govern them.??

At issue were initiative petitions aimed at implementing a stepped increase in minimum wage and mandating certain paid sick leave provisions for Michigan employers. These measures were originally slated to be put on the ballot in 2018 following a citizen-initiated petition drive. However, the Legislature adopted the measures to remove them from the ballot and then significantly amended them within the same legislative session to alter and essentially eliminate the proposals sought by the voters, enacting Public Acts 368 and 369. The amended laws were enacted with a simple majority.?

Nessel was named as a defendant in this lawsuit in her official capacity based on an opinion rendered by her predecessor [ [link removed] ] upholding the legality of the ?adopt-and-amend? tactic.?

###?






AG logo [ [link removed] ]





*Media Inquiries* <[email protected]>




*Latest Releases* [ [link removed] ]




*File a Complaint* [ [link removed] ]







________________________________________________________________________

Michigan Department of the Attorney General [ [link removed] ] ? Questions?
? Contact Us [ [link removed] ]

STAY CONNECTED: Visit us on Twitter [ [link removed] ] Instagram logo [ [link removed] ] Visit us on Facebook [ [link removed] ] YouTube [ [link removed] ] Sign up for email updates [ [link removed] ] ? ? ?

Bookmark and Share [ [link removed] ]

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES:
Manage Preferences [ [link removed] ]??|?Help [ [link removed] ]

________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Michigan Attorney General ? G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor?? 525 W. Ottawa St., P.O. Box 30212 ? Lansing, MI 48909?? 517-373-1100
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis