Before Kamala Harris became the candidate, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia had all drifted toward Trump, leaving Dems with the narrow path of winning all of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Trump is now spending $100 million in those three states to define Kamala negatively. Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania, is a top choice to be Kamala’s running mate in part because he would help a lot in PA – he’s very popular there. I like that choice. Mark Kelly would have a similar, if lesser, impact in Arizona.
Normally, VP picks don’t matter all that much. But in this race everything could matter because it will likely be decided by a relative handful of voters in a few states.
On that front, Trump is likely regretting his pick of
JD Vance, who doesn’t bring a lot to the table electorally and may make things worse at the margins. Vance is the rare kind of politician who seems to court hostility, minus the celebrity status to make it okay.
Kamala needs to simultaneously turnout Democratic base voters and win over wavering swing voters in the Midwest and the sunbelt who don’t like Trump. She remains undefined in the minds of many voters. It’s a sprint. Her path is narrow. But there is a path, which is something I could not have said only days ago.
It’s the best chance we have to fend off Trump. I hope the country takes it.
If you want better choices, we do too!
Forward is backing good local candidates around the country and is growing all of the time. Check us out
here. And if you're in LA we are having a
picnic on August 4th!